Air Force awards $28.3M for technical and analytical support to CGI Federal Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,335,726 ($28.3M)

Contractor: CGI Federal Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-09-27

End Date: 2026-12-27

Contract Duration: 1,917 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PKS-HOFFMAN-COLLINS - AWARD AIR FORCE TECHNICAL & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (AFTAS PRO) TASK ORDER.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20330

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.3 million to CGI FEDERAL INC. for work described as: PKS-HOFFMAN-COLLINS - AWARD AIR FORCE TECHNICAL & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (AFTAS PRO) TASK ORDER. Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for administrative management and general management consulting services. 3. A firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that the price is set and not subject to adjustment based on the contractor's cost experience. 4. The contract duration is over 1900 days, spanning from late 2021 to late 2026. 5. The award is a delivery order under a larger task order contract. 6. The geographic location of performance is Washington D.C.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $28.3 million over approximately five years suggests a moderate investment for specialized technical and analytical support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative and management consulting services within the Department of Defense would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the overall value is contingent on the quality and impact of the services delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of multiple bidders (3 indicated) suggests a healthy level of competition, which typically drives down prices and encourages innovation. The specific number of bids received is not detailed, but the 'full and open' designation is a positive sign for competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value and price for the required services, reducing the risk of overpayment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force, which will receive technical and analytical support. Services delivered are expected to enhance administrative management and general management consulting capabilities. The contract is set to be performed in Washington D.C., impacting the local professional services market. This contract supports the Air Force's operational and administrative functions, indirectly benefiting national defense.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
The long duration of the contract may lead to challenges in adapting to evolving technological or operational needs.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contractor, CGI Federal Inc., is a known entity in government contracting, suggesting a degree of established capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise that agencies may not possess internally. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms vying for government contracts. The value of this specific award is moderate within the broader context of federal IT and professional services spending.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, CGI Federal Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors depending on their own subcontracting plans and the nature of the services required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Air Force Technical and Analytical Support Services
Professional Services Contracts
Management Consulting Services
Department of Defense IT and Professional Services

Risk Flags

Contract duration exceeds typical project cycles, potentially leading to adaptability challenges.
Firm-fixed-price structure may incentivize cost-cutting over quality if not carefully monitored.
Performance data for CGI Federal Inc. on similar contracts should be reviewed for potential risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.3 million to CGI FEDERAL INC.. PKS-HOFFMAN-COLLINS - AWARD AIR FORCE TECHNICAL & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (AFTAS PRO) TASK ORDER.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CGI FEDERAL INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-27. End: 2026-12-27.

What is CGI Federal Inc.'s track record with the Department of the Air Force and other federal agencies?

CGI Federal Inc. has a significant track record of contracting with various U.S. federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Department of the Air Force. They have been awarded numerous contracts across a wide range of services, including IT, management consulting, and administrative support. Their history includes both large, complex programs and smaller task orders. While specific performance details for individual contracts are often not publicly detailed, their continued success in winning federal contracts suggests a generally positive performance record and established relationships within the government contracting space. Analyzing past performance reviews and any reported contract disputes or awards would provide a more granular understanding of their reliability and effectiveness.

How does the $28.3 million value compare to similar Air Force contracts for management consulting services?

The $28.3 million award for technical and analytical support over approximately five years represents a moderate-sized contract within the broader landscape of federal professional services. For the Department of the Air Force, contracts of this magnitude are common for specialized support functions. Benchmarking against similar 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541611) awards would be necessary for a precise comparison. However, considering the duration and the nature of the services, this value appears reasonable, especially given it was awarded under full and open competition. Larger, more complex transformation or IT modernization programs within the Air Force can reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, placing this contract in a mid-tier category for specialized consulting.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract?

The primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, while generally favorable for cost control, revolve around potential quality compromises and scope definition. If the FFP is set too low, the contractor might be incentivized to cut corners on quality to maintain profitability, potentially impacting the effectiveness of the technical and analytical support. Conversely, if the scope of work is not meticulously defined and managed, the government might not receive the full value intended, or the contractor could face challenges in meeting undefined expectations. Another risk is the contractor's ability to adapt to evolving Air Force needs over the contract's five-year duration; an FFP contract can make it more difficult and costly to incorporate significant changes compared to cost-reimbursement contracts.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for this type of service?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for services like technical and analytical support. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids that reflect fair market value. This process encourages innovation and efficiency as contractors strive to differentiate themselves based on technical merit and price. The presence of multiple bidders, as indicated by the 'no': 3 metric, further supports the notion of a competitive environment. This approach minimizes the risk of contractor lock-in and reduces the potential for inflated pricing that can occur with sole-source or limited competition awards.

What are the historical spending patterns for administrative and management consulting services within the Air Force?

Historical spending patterns for administrative and management consulting services within the Air Force, and the broader Department of Defense, show a consistent and significant investment in these areas. Agencies frequently procure these services to augment internal capabilities, manage complex projects, improve organizational efficiency, and provide strategic advice. Spending in this category often fluctuates based on specific program needs, budget allocations, and strategic priorities. While this specific $28.3 million award is a single data point, the overall trend indicates that the Air Force relies heavily on external expertise for management and administrative functions. Analyzing aggregated spending data over several fiscal years would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and dominant contractors within this domain.

What are the implications of the contract being a 'delivery order' under a larger task order contract?

The fact that this award is a 'delivery order' under a larger 'task order contract' signifies a specific contracting vehicle structure. Task order contracts (like Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity - IDIQ - contracts) allow agencies to procure a broad range of services over a period, with specific tasks and quantities defined through individual task orders or delivery orders. This structure provides flexibility for the agency to order services as needed. For this specific contract, it means the $28.3 million is the value allocated for this particular delivery order, which is part of a potentially larger, pre-competed contract vehicle. This approach streamlines the procurement process for subsequent needs but means the initial competition likely occurred at the IDIQ level, with this delivery order being a subsequent award based on that established vehicle.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12601 FAIR LAKES CIR # 100, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $32,097,929

Exercised Options: $32,097,929

Current Obligation: $28,335,726

Actual Outlays: $1,335,550

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F021BA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline