DoD's $10.6M Contract for Admin Management Consulting Services Awarded to HII Mission Technologies Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,636,091 ($10.6M)
Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-11-01
End Date: 2009-04-30
Contract Duration: 911 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: LABOR BASE YEAR
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 23666
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.6 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: LABOR BASE YEAR Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $10.6 million, was awarded to HII Mission Technologies Corp. 2. This award falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The base year of the contract spans from November 2006 to April 2009. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating a set price for the services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.6 million for a base year appears reasonable for administrative management and general management consulting services, especially given the firm fixed price structure which transfers some risk to the contractor.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of potential bidders and promotes price discovery through competitive bidding.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were likely used efficiently to secure these consulting services at a fair market price.
Public Impact
Ensures the Department of the Air Force receives essential administrative and management consulting support. The firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government. Full and open competition potentially leads to better value for taxpayer dollars. The contract duration of over two years allows for sustained support and project continuity.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or deliverables in the provided data.
- Potential for scope creep in consulting services if not tightly managed.
- Contract awarded in 2006, current relevance and pricing benchmarks may differ.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Contract awarded to a known entity (HII Mission Technologies Corp.).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative and management consulting. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs, but competitive awards generally aim for cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and there is no explicit information on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The firm fixed price contract and full and open competition suggest a degree of oversight through the competitive process and defined cost structure. However, specific oversight mechanisms for performance and quality are not detailed in the provided data.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded over 15 years ago, making current benchmarks potentially irrelevant.
- No information on performance metrics or quality assurance.
- Small business participation is not indicated.
- Potential for scope creep in consulting services.
- Limited insight into the specific value delivered by the consulting services.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.6 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. LABOR BASE YEAR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-11-01. End: 2009-04-30.
What specific administrative and management consulting services were rendered under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of the Air Force's mission objectives?
The provided data categorizes the service as 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611). While the contract value and award details are present, specific deliverables, project outcomes, or the precise nature of the consulting provided are not detailed. To assess the true value, a review of the contract's statement of work and performance reports would be necessary to understand its contribution to the Air Force's operational efficiency or strategic goals.
Given the contract was awarded in 2006, what are the potential risks associated with using outdated pricing and service benchmarks for current analysis?
Using data from 2006 presents a significant risk of outdated pricing and service benchmarks. Inflation, market shifts, and changes in technology or service delivery models can drastically alter the 'fair' cost of such services today. Without adjustments for these factors, any analysis of value for money or cost-effectiveness could be misleading, potentially over or underestimating the true market rate for comparable services in the current environment.
How effective was the full and open competition in ensuring the best possible price and quality for these consulting services?
Full and open competition is generally considered an effective method for achieving competitive pricing and encouraging quality. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it fosters a market-driven environment where contractors must offer compelling value. However, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the actual number and quality of bids received. Without further details on the bidding process and outcomes, it's presumed effective but not definitively proven.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Alion Science and Technology Corporation (UEI: 119162332)
Address: 1000 BURR RIDGE PKWY, BURR RIDGE, IL, 06
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,636,091
Exercised Options: $10,636,091
Current Obligation: $10,636,091
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0282M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-11-01
Current End Date: 2009-04-30
Potential End Date: 2009-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-03-17
More Contracts from HII Mission Technologies Corp
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca18f0067 IS Hereby Awarded to Alion Science and Technology Corporation to Provide Contractor Support to the Joint Capability Embedded Technology Insertion and Integration (jcetii) Remote Sensing Center (RSC) Within the National Capital Region (NCR). the Period of Performance for This to Will BE September 28, 2018 Through September 27, 2023. the Total Value of the to Will BE $769,178,979 — $934.5M (General Services Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract Action IS to Transfer the Administration of This Order From GSA Region 1 to GSA Fedsim — $870.8M (General Services Administration)
- Award of Nite Task Order — $816.6M (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Award a Task Order - Joint Network of Engineering and Emerging Operations (jneeo) — $723.3M (General Services Administration)
- Services 01 JAN 09 to 31 DEC 09 — $684.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)