DoD's $13.5M Facility Condition Assessment contract awarded to J.M. Waller Associates, Inc. for IT infrastructure services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,554,896 ($13.6M)
Contractor: J. M. Waller Associates, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-09-30
End Date: 2012-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,827 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: IT
Official Description: FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT (FCA)
Place of Performance
Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31098
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.6 million to J. M. WALLER ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT (FCA) Key points: 1. The contract value of $13.5 million over five years suggests a significant investment in maintaining critical infrastructure. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad market search for qualified vendors. 3. The duration of 1827 days (approx. 5 years) points to a long-term need for facility condition assessment services. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 518210 suggests a focus on data processing and hosting services. 5. The contract was awarded in 2007, providing a historical benchmark for IT infrastructure support spending. 6. The base contract value of $7.4 million indicates initial scope, with potential for growth through modifications.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $13.5 million for facility condition assessments over five years appears reasonable given the scope of IT infrastructure services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT support contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the initial award amount of $7.4 million suggests a substantial, but not exorbitant, price for the services rendered. Further analysis would require comparing the specific deliverables and performance metrics against industry standards and other government contracts for similar assessments.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of two bidders (no: 2) indicates a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While competition is present, a higher number of bidders would typically lead to more aggressive pricing and potentially better value for the government. The limited number of bidders might suggest a specialized service or a market with fewer qualified providers.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of offers, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality through market forces.
Public Impact
The Department of the Air Force benefits from improved understanding of its facility conditions, enabling better resource allocation for maintenance and upgrades. Services delivered likely include detailed assessments of IT infrastructure, data centers, and related facilities, ensuring operational readiness. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the areas managed by the Department of the Air Force, potentially across multiple bases or installations. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized IT and facilities management personnel, both within the government and the contractor's organization.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial projections.
- Risk of vendor lock-in if the contractor develops unique expertise or proprietary tools.
- Dependency on contractor performance for critical infrastructure assessments.
- Challenges in ensuring consistent service quality across a long-term contract.
- Potential for outdated assessment methodologies if not regularly updated.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
- Long contract duration implies a stable, ongoing need for these services.
- The contractor, J.M. Waller Associates, Inc., has experience in government contracting.
- The contract falls under a standard NAICS code for IT services, indicating a well-defined service category.
- The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, a major defense agency with established procurement processes.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology and Data Processing sector, specifically related to infrastructure management and assessment. The market for IT services, including facility condition assessments, is substantial and competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized solutions. The spending benchmark for similar IT infrastructure support contracts within the federal government can vary widely based on scope and duration, but a $13.5 million award over five years for a critical function like facility assessment is indicative of a significant requirement.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract included specific small business set-asides. The award to J.M. Waller Associates, Inc., a single entity, does not inherently suggest subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting plans were mandated or voluntarily pursued by the prime contractor to engage the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the Department of the Air Force. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and adherence to contract terms are key oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense IT Modernization Programs
- Air Force Base Infrastructure Maintenance
- Federal IT Services Procurement
- Facility Management Contracts
- Data Center Operations Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the long duration.
- Risk of outdated assessment methodologies over time.
- Dependency on contractor expertise for critical infrastructure evaluation.
Tags
it, defense, department-of-defense, air-force, facility-condition-assessment, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, it-infrastructure, data-processing, georgia, contract-award-2007
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.6 million to J. M. WALLER ASSOCIATES, INC.. FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT (FCA)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is J. M. WALLER ASSOCIATES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-09-30. End: 2012-09-30.
What was the specific scope of work for the Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT (FCA)' and falls under NAICS code 518210 (Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services). While specific deliverables are not detailed, it can be inferred that the scope involved assessing the condition of IT-related facilities, which could include data centers, server rooms, network infrastructure housing, and associated power and cooling systems. This would likely involve site inspections, documentation review, risk analysis, and reporting on the state of these facilities, identifying deficiencies, and recommending corrective actions or upgrades to ensure operational integrity and compliance with standards.
How does the $13.5 million contract value compare to other similar IT infrastructure assessment contracts awarded by the DoD?
Direct comparison of the $13.5 million contract value to similar IT infrastructure assessment contracts is challenging without more granular data on the scope, duration, and specific services rendered in other awards. However, considering this contract spanned approximately five years (1827 days) and was awarded under full and open competition, the average annual value is around $2.7 million. This figure provides a benchmark for the scale of investment the Air Force was willing to make for comprehensive facility condition assessments of its IT infrastructure during that period. Larger, more complex IT environments or contracts with broader service requirements could easily exceed this value.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate J.M. Waller Associates, Inc.'s performance?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used for this contract. Typically, for facility condition assessment contracts, KPIs might include timeliness of reports, accuracy of assessments, adherence to specified methodologies, completeness of documentation, and client satisfaction. The Department of the Air Force would have established specific metrics within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) to measure the contractor's success in identifying facility deficiencies, assessing risks, and providing actionable recommendations for IT infrastructure.
What is the historical spending trend for Facility Condition Assessments within the Department of the Air Force?
This specific contract represents a $13.5 million expenditure for Facility Condition Assessments (FCA) by the Department of the Air Force over a five-year period starting in 2007. To understand historical spending trends, one would need to analyze FCA contract awards over a longer timeframe, looking at the total dollar amounts awarded annually, the number of contracts, and the types of facilities assessed. This single contract provides a data point for a specific period and service type, but a comprehensive trend analysis would require aggregating data from numerous similar contracts across multiple fiscal years.
Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?
The provided data does not explicitly list risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, general risks associated with long-term IT infrastructure assessment contracts can include scope creep, changes in technology rendering assessments outdated, difficulties in accessing facilities, and contractor performance issues. The fact that the contract was awarded under full and open competition with two bidders suggests a degree of market interest, but also implies potential challenges in finding a large pool of qualified providers for specialized IT facility assessments.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9249 OLD KEENE MILL RD, BURKE, VA, 11
Business Categories: Category Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,554,896
Exercised Options: $13,554,896
Current Obligation: $13,554,896
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F0017L
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-09-30
Current End Date: 2012-09-30
Potential End Date: 2012-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-09-26
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)