DoD's $13.3M contract for computer systems design services awarded to Washington Technology Group, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,281,284 ($13.3M)

Contractor: Washington Technology Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-10-01

End Date: 2010-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 19

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200511!000019!5700!FA5215!15CONS/LGC !FA521504C0018 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041001!20050930!072184547!072184547!072184547!N!WASHINGTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, I!8701 GEORGIA AVENUE !SILVER SPRING !MD!20910!14050!003!15!HICKAM AFB !HONOLULU !HAWAII !+000002714002!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541512!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!019!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!A!N!N!C! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: HICKAM AFB, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96853

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.3 million to WASHINGTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. for work described as: 200511!000019!5700!FA5215!15CONS/LGC !FA521504C0018 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041001!20050930!072184547!072184547!072184547!N!WASHINGTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, I!8701 GEORGIA AVENUE !SILVER SPRING !MD!20910!14050!003!15!HICKAM AFB !HONO… Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. The services fall under 'Computer Systems Design Services', a common IT support category. 5. The awardee is a single entity, Washington Technology Group, Inc. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $13,281,283.80 over a period of approximately 5.5 years. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for computer systems design services is challenging without more specific details on the scope of work. However, the average annual value is roughly $2.4 million. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides some predictability, but the overall value for money depends heavily on the quality and effectiveness of the services delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically involves soliciting bids from all responsible prospective contractors. The data indicates 19 bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A higher number of bids generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition indicates that taxpayers likely benefited from a competitive pricing environment, as multiple companies vied to win the contract.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force, which receives computer systems design services. These services are crucial for maintaining and potentially upgrading the IT infrastructure and systems used by the Air Force. The geographic impact is centered around Hickam AFB in Honolulu, Hawaii, where the services are likely performed or directly support operations. The contract supports jobs within the IT services sector, particularly in computer systems design and related fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for all project complexities.
Risk of vendor lock-in if the contractor becomes indispensable to critical systems.
Dependence on a single contractor for essential IT services could pose a risk if performance degrades.
The long duration of the contract might lead to outdated technology solutions if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process that should drive value.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty for the government.
The contractor, Washington Technology Group, Inc., has secured this contract, suggesting they met the government's requirements.
The contract supports critical IT functions for the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. This is a significant market within federal contracting, as agencies rely heavily on IT for operations, intelligence, and logistics. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. The size of this particular contract, approximately $13.3 million over 5.5 years, is moderate within the broader IT services landscape for the Department of Defense.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically tied to small business set-asides for this award. The primary contractor, Washington Technology Group, Inc., is responsible for fulfilling the contract requirements, and any subcontracting decisions would be at their discretion, not mandated by a small business set-aside provision.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally provided through contract award databases like FPDS, where basic details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

IT Professional Services
Computer Systems Design
Defense IT Support
Air Force IT Contracts
Information Technology Services

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
Firm Fixed Price contracts can sometimes lack flexibility for evolving requirements.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.3 million to WASHINGTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.. 200511!000019!5700!FA5215!15CONS/LGC !FA521504C0018 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041001!20050930!072184547!072184547!072184547!N!WASHINGTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, I!8701 GEORGIA AVENUE !SILVER SPRING !MD!20910!14050!003!15!HICKAM AFB !HONOLULU !HAWAII !+000002714002!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541512!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WASHINGTON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-10-01. End: 2010-03-31.

What is the track record of Washington Technology Group, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

Washington Technology Group, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts. Based on the provided data, this specific contract (FA521504C0018) was awarded in 2004 for Computer Systems Design Services. Further analysis of federal procurement databases would be necessary to provide a comprehensive overview of their entire contract history, including performance ratings, past performance on similar contracts, and any significant issues or successes. Understanding their broader performance record is crucial for assessing the reliability and effectiveness of their service delivery on this particular award.

How does the awarded amount of $13.3 million compare to similar computer systems design contracts awarded by the Air Force or DoD in the mid-2000s?

The awarded amount of $13.3 million over approximately 5.5 years, averaging around $2.4 million annually, represents a moderate-sized contract for IT services during the mid-2000s. The Department of Defense, and the Air Force in particular, frequently awarded large contracts for systems integration, software development, and IT support. Without specific details on the scope of services (e.g., complexity, number of users supported, specific systems involved), a precise comparison is difficult. However, contracts of this magnitude were common for supporting significant operational or infrastructure needs within the military.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how was performance measured?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, such details would be outlined in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS). These would define the expected quality, timeliness, and scope of the computer systems design services. Performance measurement would likely involve regular reviews, reporting by the contractor, and oversight by government personnel to ensure compliance with the SOW and any established SLAs. The firm fixed-price nature suggests that meeting defined deliverables would be paramount.

Were there any significant challenges or disputes encountered during the performance of this contract?

The provided summary data does not indicate any significant challenges, disputes, or contract modifications for FA521504C0018. However, this is a high-level overview. A thorough review of contract modification history, payment records, and any associated contract disputes or claims databases would be required to definitively ascertain if any issues arose during its performance. Long-term contracts, especially those involving complex IT systems, can sometimes encounter scope changes, technical hurdles, or performance disagreements.

What was the total spending on 'Computer Systems Design Services' by the Department of the Air Force in the fiscal year this contract was awarded (FY2005)?

The provided data focuses solely on this specific contract (FA521504C0018) and does not offer a breakdown of total spending for the 'Computer Systems Design Services' category by the Department of the Air Force in FY2005. To determine this, one would need to access comprehensive federal spending databases (like FPDS or USASpending.gov) and filter for the relevant agency, fiscal year, and Product/Service Code (PSC) or North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code (541512 in this case). This would provide a broader context of the Air Force's investment in this service area during that period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 19

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8701 GEORGIA AVENUE, SILVER SPRING, MD, 08

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline