Department of Defense awarded $16.5M for waste management services to Yamaki Co., Ltd

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,467,413 ($16.5M)

Contractor: Yamaki CO., Ltd.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-10-01

End Date: 2012-08-31

Contract Duration: 2,161 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.5 million to YAMAKI CO., LTD. for work described as: WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 2161 days (approx. 6 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562219 points to specialized waste treatment and disposal services. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Air Force, a major component of the Department of Defense. 6. The contract was awarded in 2006 and completed in 2012, providing historical spending context.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific details on the scope of services and the geographic locations covered. However, a six-year contract for waste management services valued at approximately $16.5 million suggests an average annual expenditure of around $2.75 million. This figure needs to be compared against similar contracts for waste management within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies operating in comparable regions to assess if it represents good value for money. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty, but the ultimate value depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided by Yamaki Co., Ltd.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition' procurement method, which is the government's preferred approach. This typically means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The fact that there were 3 bids received indicates a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. A higher number of bidders generally suggests more robust competition, which can lead to better pricing and service options for the government. However, the specific nature of waste management services, which can be geographically dependent and require specialized capabilities, might naturally limit the pool of potential bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with a limited number of bidders, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best possible price and service through a structured bidding process, promoting market efficiency.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are the Department of the Air Force installations requiring waste management services. The services delivered include the treatment and disposal of nonhazardous waste. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around the Air Force facilities where Yamaki Co., Ltd. provided services. This contract supports jobs within the waste management sector, specifically for the contractor's employees.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality and efficiency of waste management.
Limited information on environmental compliance and reporting associated with the waste disposal.
The contract's age means current market rates and best practices may have evolved significantly.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating an effort to achieve competitive pricing.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
Long contract duration suggests a stable, ongoing requirement met by the contractor.

Sector Analysis

The waste management services sector is a critical component of industrial operations, encompassing collection, treatment, and disposal of various waste streams. This contract falls under the 'Other Nonhazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal' category (NAICS 562219). The federal government is a significant consumer of such services across its numerous installations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale waste management contracts awarded to private entities by federal agencies, particularly within the Department of Defense, to understand typical pricing structures and service scopes.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have involved small business set-asides, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or performance. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, unless the prime contractor, Yamaki Co., Ltd., engaged small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officers and administrative contracting officers within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are typically embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected or reported during the contract's performance period.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Support Contracts
Environmental Services Contracts
Hazardous Waste Management Services
Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract awarded in the past; current relevance and pricing may differ.
Limited performance data available for assessment.
Scope of services not fully detailed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.5 million to YAMAKI CO., LTD.. WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YAMAKI CO., LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2012-08-31.

What was the specific scope of 'Other Nonhazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal' services provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES' under NAICS code 562219, which covers 'Other Nonhazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal'. However, the specific details of the services rendered are not elaborated in the provided data. This could encompass a wide range of activities such as collection, transportation, recycling, composting, incineration, or landfilling of nonhazardous waste generated by Department of the Air Force facilities. Without a detailed statement of work (SOW) or contract line item numbers (CLINs), it's impossible to ascertain the precise nature and extent of the services. Understanding the scope is crucial for evaluating performance, cost-effectiveness, and comparing it to similar contracts.

How did Yamaki Co., Ltd.'s pricing compare to other bidders, and what does this suggest about value for money?

The provided data indicates that three bids were received for this contract. However, it does not include the pricing details of each bidder or the specific award price relative to the other proposals. To assess value for money, one would need to compare Yamaki Co., Ltd.'s awarded price against the proposed prices of the unsuccessful bidders and potentially against independent government cost estimates or market research data for similar services in the same geographic area. A firm fixed-price contract awarded through full and open competition suggests an effort to obtain competitive pricing. If Yamaki's bid was significantly lower than others, it might indicate aggressive pricing or potentially a less comprehensive service offering. Conversely, if it was the highest compliant bid, it might suggest a higher quality or more extensive service, but potentially at a premium.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this waste management contract, and how did Yamaki Co., Ltd. perform against them?

The provided data does not contain information regarding the key performance indicators (KPIs) established for this waste management services contract, nor does it include any performance evaluations or quality assurance assessments of Yamaki Co., Ltd.'s work. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to waste diversion rates, timely collection, proper disposal documentation, environmental compliance, and safety incident rates. Without these performance metrics and the contractor's actual performance against them, it is not possible to definitively assess the effectiveness or efficiency of the services provided. This lack of detail limits a thorough evaluation of the contractor's track record and the overall success of the contract in meeting its objectives.

What is the historical spending trend for waste management services by the Department of the Air Force, and how does this $16.5M contract fit in?

The provided data only offers information for this single contract awarded in 2006 and completed in 2012, totaling $16.5 million over approximately six years. To understand historical spending trends, a broader dataset encompassing multiple years and various contracts for waste management services across the Department of the Air Force (and potentially the entire Department of Defense) would be necessary. This single award represents an average annual expenditure of roughly $2.75 million for waste management at the specific Air Force installations served. Without comparative data on other contracts, it's difficult to determine if this amount is typical, high, or low relative to the Air Force's overall spending on such services or the scale of operations it supported.

Were there any specific environmental or regulatory compliance challenges associated with this contract?

The contract data specifies that the services were for 'Other Nonhazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal' (NAICS 562219). While 'nonhazardous' implies a lower risk profile than hazardous waste, waste management operations are still subject to stringent federal, state, and local environmental regulations. The provided data does not detail any specific compliance challenges, penalties, or environmental incidents related to this contract. A comprehensive review would require access to inspection reports, environmental audits, and any correspondence between the contractor and regulatory agencies or the contracting officer regarding compliance issues. The absence of such information suggests that, based on available records, there were no major reported compliance failures during the contract period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Waste Treatment and Disposal › Other Nonhazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: FA520906R0006

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3884, MIKAJIRI, KUMAGAYA

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,600,184

Exercised Options: $16,467,413

Current Obligation: $16,467,413

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline