DoD's $18.8M Elmendorf Support Services Contract Lacked Competition, Awarded to DCA
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,827,456 ($18.8M)
Contractor: Elmendorf Support Services
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-10-01
End Date: 2012-06-29
Contract Duration: 2,463 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: JBER, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99506, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Alaska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.8 million to ELMENDORF SUPPORT SERVICES for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract awarded to DCA for facilities support services totaled $18.8 million. 2. The contract was not available for competition, raising concerns about price discovery. 3. The duration of the contract was 2463 days, spanning from October 2005 to June 2012. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 561210 for Facilities Support Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Contract value is $18.8 million over approximately 6.7 years. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price was optimal compared to similar facilities support services contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was explicitly stated as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'. This limited competition approach likely resulted in less favorable pricing and reduced opportunities for innovative solutions from a wider range of vendors.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may have led to taxpayers paying more than necessary for these facilities support services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competitive bidding. Limited vendor pool restricts potential for cost savings and service improvements. Long contract duration (over 6 years) could mean outdated service models. The specific services provided under facilities support are broad and impact daily operations at Elmendorf.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Limited Price Discovery
- Long Contract Duration
Positive Signals
- Specific Service Provided
- Department of Defense Contract
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) encompass a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the facilities managed.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The limited competition nature of the award suggests fewer opportunities for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status raises questions about the justification for not seeking competitive bids. Further review would be needed to understand the oversight processes that led to this award method.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Potential for Overpricing
- Limited Vendor Innovation
- Extended Contract Duration without Re-evaluation
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, ak, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.8 million to ELMENDORF SUPPORT SERVICES. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ELMENDORF SUPPORT SERVICES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-10-01. End: 2012-06-29.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract without competition?
The provided data states 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' without further justification. Typically, such awards require a documented rationale, such as a sole-source justification or a specific emergency circumstance, to ensure fair and responsible use of taxpayer funds.
How did the lack of competition impact the overall value for money?
Without competitive bids, it is challenging to establish a benchmark for value for money. The absence of competing offers means the government did not benefit from potential price reductions or service enhancements that competition often drives, likely resulting in a less favorable outcome for taxpayers.
What are the risks associated with a long-term, non-competitive contract for facilities support?
Risks include potential cost overruns, service stagnation, and vendor lock-in. A non-competitive, long-term contract may disincentivize the contractor from innovating or reducing costs, as there is no immediate threat of losing the business to a competitor.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4720 BUSINESS PARK BLVD ST, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $78,327,302
Exercised Options: $21,076,572
Current Obligation: $18,827,456
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-10-01
Current End Date: 2012-06-29
Potential End Date: 2012-06-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-04-20
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)