Air Force awards $10.1M for Human Performance Optimization, supporting key commands
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,185,097 ($10.2M)
Contractor: LMR Technical Group LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-06-01
End Date: 2026-05-31
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $28.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE LEVEL OF EFFORT
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: HUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF OPTIMIZING THE HUMAN WEAPON SYSTEM (OHWS) FOR ACC, AFMC, PACAF, USAFE, AND AFRC
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23665
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.2 million to LMR TECHNICAL GROUP LLC for work described as: HUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF OPTIMIZING THE HUMAN WEAPON SYSTEM (OHWS) FOR ACC, AFMC, PACAF, USAFE, AND AFRC Key points: 1. Contract focuses on optimizing the 'human weapon system' for operational effectiveness. 2. LMR Technical Group LLC secured the award, indicating a specific capability provider. 3. The fixed-price, level-of-effort contract structure aims to control costs for defined tasks. 4. This award falls under 'All Other Miscellaneous Ambulatory Health Care Services', suggesting a broad application of HPO.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The $10.1M contract value appears reasonable for specialized human performance optimization services supporting multiple Air Force commands over a year. Benchmarking against similar HPO contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive process that aimed for best value. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to yield fair pricing, ensuring taxpayer funds are used efficiently for critical human performance enhancement.
Public Impact
Enhances readiness and effectiveness of Air Force personnel across multiple major commands. Supports the 'human weapon system' concept, integrating personnel optimization into military strategy. Potential for improved operational outcomes and reduced human-related performance issues. Services may include training, health, cognitive, and physical performance optimization strategies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in 'level of effort' contracts if not tightly managed.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical human performance optimization.
Positive Signals
- Focus on optimizing personnel, a key asset for military effectiveness.
- Competitive award process suggests potential for good value.
- Clear contract duration and defined scope of work.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under miscellaneous health care services, but its application to human performance optimization for military personnel places it in a specialized niche. Spending in this area is often tied to readiness and operational effectiveness initiatives.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The award process, being full and open competition, suggests a degree of oversight. However, ongoing monitoring of performance and cost against the level of effort will be crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- All Other Miscellaneous Ambulatory Health Care Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if 'level of effort' is not strictly managed.
- Risk of contractor lock-in if HPO becomes critical and competition is limited in the future.
- Measuring the direct impact of HPO on mission success can be complex.
- Dependence on specialized expertise that may be difficult to source quickly.
Tags
all-other-miscellaneous-ambulatory-healt, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.2 million to LMR TECHNICAL GROUP LLC. HUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION (HPO) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF OPTIMIZING THE HUMAN WEAPON SYSTEM (OHWS) FOR ACC, AFMC, PACAF, USAFE, AND AFRC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LMR TECHNICAL GROUP LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-06-01. End: 2026-05-31.
What specific metrics will be used to measure the success of the Human Performance Optimization services?
Success metrics should align with the 'optimizing the human weapon system' objective. This could include improvements in personnel readiness rates, reduction in training errors, enhanced cognitive performance under stress, faster recovery times, and overall mission accomplishment. Clear, quantifiable metrics are essential for evaluating the contract's value and effectiveness.
How will the Air Force ensure the 'level of effort' does not lead to inefficient service delivery or cost overruns?
Effective management of a 'level of effort' contract requires robust oversight. The Air Force should establish clear performance standards, regular progress reviews, and potentially milestone-based payments. Continuous monitoring of contractor activities and deliverables against the defined scope will be critical to prevent scope creep and ensure efficient use of funds.
What is the long-term strategy for integrating HPO services beyond this initial contract?
The Air Force should consider if HPO services are a temporary initiative or a permanent integration into military operations. Developing a long-term strategy will inform future contracting approaches, potentially leading to more strategic partnerships or organic capability development. Understanding the sustained need will guide investment and ensure continuous improvement in personnel optimization.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Other Ambulatory Health Care Services › All Other Miscellaneous Ambulatory Health Care Services
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › OTHER MEDICAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE LEVEL OF EFFORT (B)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5635 SMU BLVD STE 103, DALLAS, TX, 75206
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $68,779,466
Exercised Options: $10,310,656
Current Obligation: $10,185,097
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA489024D0005
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-06-01
Current End Date: 2026-05-31
Potential End Date: 2030-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-16
More Contracts from LMR Technical Group LLC
- A3 Ohws Service Which Increases the Physical Capacity of Fighter Aircrew, Decreasing the Rate of Injuries, and Accelerating Return to Duty — $41.9M (Department of Defense)
- Human Performance Optimization (HPO) Services for AIR Education and Training Command (aetc) Comprehensive Readiness for Aircrew Flying Training (craft) — $6.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)