DoD's $6.2M Fort Eustis Base Maintenance Contract Awarded to Aleut Management Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $6,233,648 ($6.2M)
Contractor: Aleut Management Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-08-14
End Date: 2026-08-31
Contract Duration: 382 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FORT EUSTIS BASE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: FORT EUSTIS, NEWPORT NEWS CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23604
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $6.2 million to ALEUT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC for work described as: FORT EUSTIS BASE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining critical military infrastructure. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The definitive contract type indicates a clear scope of work and pricing structure. 4. The contract duration of over a year allows for sustained facility support. 5. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts performance risk to the contractor. 6. Virginia is the primary geographic location for services, impacting the local economy.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $6.2 million for base maintenance services at Fort Eustis appears reasonable given the scope of facilities support. Benchmarking against similar base maintenance contracts across the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has committed to delivering services within a defined budget, which is generally favorable for the government. The number of bids received (3) indicates some level of competition, which typically helps in achieving fair pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on predefined criteria. Three bids were received, suggesting a moderate level of competition. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions. The exclusion of certain sources, if not fully justified, could potentially limit price discovery and the best value outcome for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, despite potential source exclusions, is intended to ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently. The presence of multiple bidders helps to drive down costs and improve service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the Department of Defense, ensuring the operational readiness of Fort Eustis. Services include essential facilities support, maintaining the functionality and safety of base infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in Virginia, potentially supporting local jobs and businesses through subcontracting. The contract supports the workforce employed by Aleut Management Services and any subcontractors involved in delivering these services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited innovation if source exclusions restricted the pool of highly specialized bidders.
- Risk of cost overruns if the fixed-price contract did not adequately account for unforeseen maintenance issues.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical base maintenance functions.
Positive Signals
- Award to a single entity streamlines management and accountability for base maintenance.
- Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contract duration allows for consistent service delivery and planning.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This contract falls within the broader defense sector's spending on base operations and infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks for base maintenance can vary significantly based on the size and complexity of the military installation. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous providers ranging from large corporations to specialized small businesses.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Aleut Management Services, LLC, is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this contract are dependent on the prime contractor's subcontracting strategy, which is not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, although detailed performance metrics and specific oversight activities are typically internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- Fort Eustis Operations and Maintenance
- Department of Defense Facilities Management
- Base Support Services Contracts
- Air Force Installation and Mission Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusions.
- Contract performance risk under fixed-price structure if scope is not well-defined.
- Dependence on contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, fort-eustis, facilities-support-services, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, aleut-management-services, virginia, air-force, base-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $6.2 million to ALEUT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC. FORT EUSTIS BASE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALEUT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $6.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-08-14. End: 2026-08-31.
What is the track record of Aleut Management Services, LLC, in performing similar base maintenance contracts for the Department of Defense?
A review of federal procurement data indicates that Aleut Management Services, LLC has a history of performing various service contracts, including those related to base operations and facilities support. Specific details regarding their performance on similar base maintenance contracts would require a deeper dive into contract performance reports (CPARS) and past performance evaluations. Generally, agencies assess past performance as a key factor in source selection. If this contract was awarded competitively, it implies that Aleut Management Services demonstrated adequate capability and past performance to be considered a viable bidder. However, without direct access to their performance history on comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess their track record beyond what is publicly available in award notices.
How does the awarded price compare to the estimated value or budget for this base maintenance requirement?
The provided data does not include the government's estimate or the total value of the requirement prior to award, only the awarded amount of $6,233,648.09. Therefore, a direct comparison to assess if the award was above, below, or at the estimated budget is not possible with the given information. In a competitive environment, it is common for the awarded price to be lower than the government's independent government cost estimate (IGCE) due to bidding dynamics. However, without the IGCE or pre-solicitation budget information, this analysis cannot be performed. Future analysis could involve FOIA requests for solicitation documents which may contain this information.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this base maintenance contract?
The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided award data. Typically, for base maintenance contracts, KPIs would focus on areas such as response times for service requests, completion rates of scheduled maintenance, facility uptime, safety incident rates, and customer satisfaction (e.g., from base personnel). The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor is incentivized to meet performance standards to avoid penalties or non-payment. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring performance against the contract's requirements and any specified KPIs.
What is the historical spending trend for base maintenance at Fort Eustis over the past five years?
The provided data focuses solely on the current award and does not offer historical spending trends for base maintenance at Fort Eustis. To determine historical spending patterns, one would need to access federal procurement databases (like USASpending.gov or FPDS) and query for all contracts related to 'Fort Eustis Base Maintenance' or similar terms (using NAICS code 561210) awarded over the past five fiscal years. This would reveal the total amount spent annually, the incumbent contractors, and the types of contracts utilized, allowing for an analysis of spending fluctuations and contractor stability.
Are there any specific risks associated with the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' contracting method for this type of service?
The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, while aiming for broad competition, introduces a specific risk: the justification for excluding certain sources must be robust and legally sound. If the exclusions are perceived as arbitrary or not serving a clear government interest (e.g., national security, specific technical requirements), it could lead to protests and delays. Furthermore, if the excluded sources represented significant competition, the government might not achieve the best possible price or innovative solutions. The risk lies in ensuring that the exclusions genuinely enhance the acquisition outcome rather than simply limiting competition without a valid rationale.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5775 MARK DABLING BLVD STE 105, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 80919
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $75,515,321
Exercised Options: $15,115,162
Current Obligation: $6,233,648
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-08-14
Current End Date: 2026-08-31
Potential End Date: 2030-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-14
More Contracts from Aleut Management Services, LLC
- THE Instruction of OTC Classes and Maintenance of Course Materials — $27.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)