Wadsworth Builders Co. Inc. awarded $8.8M contract for building systems repair at Malmstrom AFB

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,800,070 ($8.8M)

Contractor: Wadsworth Builders CO Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-06-01

End Date: 2025-12-20

Contract Duration: 567 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: WORK UNDER THIS PROJECT MAY CONSIST OF, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE REPAIR OF ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL, AND FIRE PROTECTION RELATED SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT BUILDING 1062.

Place of Performance

Location: MALMSTROM AFB, CASCADE County, MONTANA, 59402

State: Montana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $8.8 million to WADSWORTH BUILDERS CO INC for work described as: WORK UNDER THIS PROJECT MAY CONSIST OF, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE REPAIR OF ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL, AND FIRE PROTECTION RELATED SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT BUILDING 1062. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on comprehensive repair of architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection systems. 2. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price type, indicating a defined scope and cost. 3. A single Delivery Order is anticipated under this contract. 4. The contract duration is 567 days, spanning from June 2024 to December 2025. 5. The contract was awarded under Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8.8 million for comprehensive building system repairs appears reasonable given the scope. While specific benchmarks for this exact type of repair across multiple systems are not readily available, the fixed-price nature suggests a degree of cost certainty. Further analysis would require comparing the unit costs of specific repair tasks against industry averages or similar government contracts for building modernization and repair.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources,' which implies that the initial solicitation was broad, but specific sources were later excluded, potentially due to specific qualifications or capabilities required for the complex repair work. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method suggests a competitive process was intended to ensure fair pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach aims to secure the best value for taxpayers by encouraging multiple firms to bid, driving down costs and ensuring quality through selection of the most capable offeror.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force and personnel stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, through the improved functionality and safety of Building 1062. Services delivered include critical repairs to essential building infrastructure, ensuring operational readiness and habitability. The geographic impact is localized to Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana. The contract supports the construction and skilled trades workforce involved in building repair and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if unforeseen issues arise beyond the explicitly defined repair categories.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to source specialized materials and labor within the fixed-price constraint.
Risk of delays if the exclusion of sources process was overly restrictive, limiting the pool of qualified bidders.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and Open Competition, even with exclusions, suggests an effort to achieve competitive pricing.
Clear definition of repair scope across multiple building systems indicates a comprehensive approach to infrastructure maintenance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on repair and maintenance of existing facilities. The federal government is a significant consumer of construction services, with spending often concentrated on infrastructure upgrades, repairs, and new construction at military bases, federal buildings, and other government installations. Benchmarks for similar repair contracts would typically consider the age and complexity of the building, the specific systems being repaired, and the prevailing labor and material costs in the region.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is minimal. However, the prime contractor, Wadsworth Builders Co. Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services or materials, contributing indirectly to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant project managers within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are embedded in the Firm Fixed Price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified repairs within the agreed budget. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Operations Support
Facilities Maintenance and Repair
Architectural and Engineering Services

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep due to complexity of integrated systems repair.
Risk of schedule delays if specialized materials or labor are difficult to procure.
Effectiveness of competition may be impacted by source exclusions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $8.8 million to WADSWORTH BUILDERS CO INC. WORK UNDER THIS PROJECT MAY CONSIST OF, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE REPAIR OF ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL, AND FIRE PROTECTION RELATED SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT BUILDING 1062.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WADSWORTH BUILDERS CO INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-06-01. End: 2025-12-20.

What is Wadsworth Builders Co. Inc.'s track record with similar federal contracts, particularly those involving extensive building system repairs?

A review of federal contract databases indicates Wadsworth Builders Co. Inc. has a history of performing construction and repair work for government entities. While specific details on the scale and complexity of past projects require deeper analysis, their award on this $8.8 million contract suggests they possess the necessary experience and qualifications for large-scale building system repairs. Further investigation into past performance reviews, any past disputes, and the types of systems they have previously worked on would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability for this specific project.

How does the $8.8 million contract value compare to similar building repair projects undertaken by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $8.8 million contract value requires comparing it against similar projects involving comprehensive repair of architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection systems in institutional or commercial buildings of comparable size and age. Without specific details on the building's condition prior to the award and the exact scope of work for each system, a precise comparison is challenging. However, for large-scale infrastructure repairs at federal facilities, this value appears within a reasonable range, especially considering the firm fixed-price nature which often includes contingencies. A more granular comparison would involve analyzing unit costs for specific repair tasks against historical data for similar government contracts.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, considering its scope and the contractor's background?

Key risk indicators for this contract include the complexity of integrating repairs across multiple distinct building systems (architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection), which can lead to coordination challenges and potential cost overruns if not managed meticulously. The firm fixed-price nature, while beneficial for cost control, can become a risk if unforeseen issues necessitate significant scope changes. Dependence on specialized materials or labor, and the potential for delays in procurement or execution, also present risks. Furthermore, the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' method, if not carefully managed, could limit the pool of qualified bidders, potentially impacting competition and price. The contractor's past performance record, if it indicates issues with schedule adherence or quality on similar projects, would also be a significant risk factor.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' approach likely to be in ensuring value for money for this specific repair project?

The effectiveness of 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' in ensuring value for money is nuanced. While 'Full and Open' aims for broad competition, the subsequent exclusion of sources suggests a need for highly specific capabilities or clearances. If the exclusions were narrowly tailored to essential requirements, it could lead to a competitive field of highly qualified contractors, potentially resulting in good value. However, if the exclusions were overly broad or subjective, they could unduly limit the number of bidders, thereby reducing competition and potentially leading to higher prices or less optimal solutions. The ultimate value for money will depend on the number of responsive bids received and the thoroughness of the evaluation process against clearly defined criteria.

What are the historical spending patterns for building repair and maintenance at Malmstrom Air Force Base or similar Air Force installations?

Historical spending patterns for building repair and maintenance at Malmstrom Air Force Base and similar Air Force installations typically show consistent investment in infrastructure upkeep. This includes routine maintenance, minor repairs, and periodic major overhauls of building systems. Spending levels can fluctuate based on the age of the facilities, the intensity of use, and the availability of appropriated funds. Contracts for such work often range from small, localized repairs to large, multi-system overhauls like the one awarded to Wadsworth Builders. Analyzing past spending data for this base or comparable installations would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the frequency of major repair initiatives, providing context for the current $8.8 million award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4601 2ND AVE N, GREAT FALLS, MT, 59405

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,800,070

Exercised Options: $8,800,070

Current Obligation: $8,800,070

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA462620D0017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline