Airfield repair contract awarded to R & W Contractors Inc. for $2.32 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,321,225 ($2.3M)

Contractor: R & W Contractors Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2026-01-09

End Date: 2027-01-08

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: AIRFIELD CONCRETE/ASPHALT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AT JBMDL, NJ. THE WORK CONSISTS OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND ALL SUPERVISION NECESSARY TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND REPAIR AIRFIELD APRON OR ASPHALT RUNWAYS.

Place of Performance

Location: TRENTON, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08641

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $2.3 million to R & W CONTRACTORS INC for work described as: AIRFIELD CONCRETE/ASPHALT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AT JBMDL, NJ. THE WORK CONSISTS OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND ALL SUPERVISION NECESSARY TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND REPAIR AIRFIELD APRON OR ASPHALT RUNWAYS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential airfield concrete and asphalt repair and maintenance. 2. The contract type is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, indicating predictable costs. 3. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive process. 4. The contract duration is one year, aligning with typical maintenance cycles. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237310 points to highway, street, and bridge construction. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements mentioned.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.32 million for a one-year airfield repair and maintenance project appears within a reasonable range for specialized construction services. Benchmarking against similar airfield repair contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the absence of detailed cost breakdowns makes a granular price assessment difficult. The contract's scope is clearly defined, which aids in evaluating its overall value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria. The number of bidders is not provided, which limits the assessment of the intensity of competition. However, the 'full and open' designation generally suggests a competitive environment that should drive price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, despite potential source exclusions, is intended to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by selecting the most cost-effective offer.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force and military personnel utilizing Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (JBMDL). The services delivered include essential repair and maintenance of airfield concrete and asphalt runways and aprons. The geographic impact is localized to JBMDL, New Jersey. The contract supports the construction and maintenance workforce, likely within the civil engineering and construction sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits the assessment of competition intensity.
The exclusion of sources, while potentially justified, warrants scrutiny to ensure fairness and broad opportunity.
No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals could mean limited direct benefit to small businesses beyond prime contractor selection.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract addresses critical infrastructure maintenance for a key military installation.
The 'full and open' competition designation suggests an effort to achieve competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically focusing on heavy and civil engineering construction related to transportation infrastructure. The market for airfield maintenance and repair is specialized, often involving contractors with specific certifications and experience. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within Department of Defense infrastructure budgets for airfield operations and maintenance across various bases.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and any involvement of small businesses would likely be through their role as subcontractors to R & W Contractors Inc. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore indirect, dependent on the prime contractor's subcontracting decisions.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and project management offices at JBMDL. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price delivery order structure, requiring completion of specified work. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, but detailed performance metrics and inspection reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Airfield Pavement Maintenance
Military Base Infrastructure
Civil Engineering Construction Contracts
Department of Defense Facilities Management

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in public award data.
Absence of explicit small business subcontracting goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $2.3 million to R & W CONTRACTORS INC. AIRFIELD CONCRETE/ASPHALT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE AT JBMDL, NJ. THE WORK CONSISTS OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND ALL SUPERVISION NECESSARY TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND REPAIR AIRFIELD APRON OR ASPHALT RUNWAYS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is R & W CONTRACTORS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-09. End: 2027-01-08.

What is the track record of R & W Contractors Inc. in performing similar airfield repair and maintenance contracts for the federal government?

Information regarding the specific track record of R & W Contractors Inc. in performing similar airfield repair and maintenance contracts for the federal government is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous government projects. This would involve searching federal procurement databases and performance rating systems to gauge their experience, reliability, and quality of work on comparable projects. Without this historical data, it is difficult to definitively assess their suitability and past performance in this specialized area.

How does the awarded amount of $2.32 million compare to the estimated cost or budget for this airfield repair project?

The provided data does not include the estimated cost or budget for the airfield repair project, making a direct comparison to the awarded amount of $2.32 million impossible. To assess value for money, one would need to know if the awarded price was significantly above, below, or in line with pre-tender estimates or historical spending on similar projects. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract suggests the government aimed for cost certainty, but without a baseline estimate, it's challenging to determine if this price represents optimal value. Further analysis would involve obtaining the government's independent cost estimate or comparing it to industry benchmarks for similar scope and scale of work.

What are the specific risks associated with the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method used for this contract?

The primary risk associated with 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' is the potential for reduced competition if the exclusion criteria are overly restrictive or not clearly justified. While intended to ensure qualified bidders, it could inadvertently limit the pool of potential offerors, potentially leading to higher prices or fewer innovative solutions. The risk lies in ensuring that the exclusion criteria are necessary, narrowly tailored, and do not unfairly disadvantage capable small businesses or other potential offerors. Transparency in the justification for exclusion is crucial to mitigate risks of perceived unfairness or anti-competitive practices.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of this airfield repair contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of this airfield repair contract. Typically, for construction and maintenance contracts, KPIs would include adherence to schedule, quality of workmanship (e.g., meeting material specifications, durability of repairs), safety compliance, and completion within the firm-fixed-price budget. The delivery order structure implies specific tasks and deliverables, and their successful execution according to the contract's technical requirements would be paramount. A thorough review of the contract's statement of work and performance clauses would be necessary to identify the defined success metrics.

How does the $2.32 million contract value compare to historical spending on airfield maintenance at JBMDL or similar Air Force bases?

Without historical spending data specifically for airfield maintenance at JBMDL or comparable Air Force bases, it is difficult to provide a precise comparison for the $2.32 million contract. General trends in federal contracting suggest that infrastructure maintenance, especially for critical assets like airfields, can involve significant investment. The value of this contract should be assessed in the context of the specific scope of work (e.g., extent of repairs, materials used, complexity of the airfield) and the prevailing market rates for construction services in the New Jersey region. A broader analysis of the Air Force's Facilities, Engineering, and Environmental (CE) budget allocations for airfield upkeep would offer further context.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the local economy in New Jersey, particularly concerning job creation and material sourcing?

This $2.32 million contract for airfield repair and maintenance at JBMDL, New Jersey, is likely to have a positive impact on the local economy. It will directly support jobs within R & W Contractors Inc. and potentially its subcontractors, likely requiring skilled labor in construction, engineering, and project management. Indirectly, it could stimulate demand for local suppliers of construction materials, equipment rentals, and related services. The extent of local economic impact depends on the contractor's hiring practices and sourcing policies, specifically whether they prioritize local workforce and material providers within New Jersey.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4 KIRKS WAY, NEWTOWN, PA, 18940

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,321,225

Exercised Options: $2,321,225

Current Obligation: $2,321,225

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA448424D0009

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline