DoD's $13.5M contract for puckboard software expansion awarded to REVACOMM INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,484,425 ($13.5M)

Contractor: Revacomm Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-09-07

End Date: 2025-09-12

Contract Duration: 1,101 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 999

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: EXPANSION OF PUCKBOARD SBRIR 2B

Place of Performance

Location: SCOTT AFB, SAINT CLAIR County, ILLINOIS, 62225

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to REVACOMM INC for work described as: EXPANSION OF PUCKBOARD SBRIR 2B Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of software expansion. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risks include contractor performance and adherence to schedule. 4. This contract supports the Air Force's software publishing needs. 5. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 6. The contract duration is 1101 days, indicating a long-term project.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.5 million for software expansion appears to be within a reasonable range for a definitive contract of this duration. Benchmarking against similar software development and expansion contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, but the ultimate value depends on the successful delivery of the expanded software capabilities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which indicates that while the competition was open, specific sources may have been excluded for documented reasons. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive environment, which should lead to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging innovation from multiple vendors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force, which will receive expanded software capabilities. The services delivered include the expansion of puckboard software. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the operational areas of the Air Force units utilizing this software. Workforce implications may include the need for personnel trained in the use and maintenance of the expanded software.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Dependence on REVACOMM INC. for successful delivery and support.
Risk of schedule delays impacting operational readiness.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a healthy market response.
Long contract duration allows for thorough development and integration.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Software Publishers industry (NAICS 511210). The market for specialized software development and expansion is significant, driven by the continuous need for technological upgrades across government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other definitive contracts for software development and enhancement awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb flags are false) was not a primary consideration or requirement for this specific contract. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting plans. This suggests that the contract was awarded to a larger entity, and its impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, primarily through potential subcontracting opportunities if REVACOMM INC. chooses to engage small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified software capabilities. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Software Development Contracts
Information Technology Services
Department of Defense IT Spending
Air Force Software Procurement
Definitive Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule slippage
Contractor performance risk
Scope creep potential

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to REVACOMM INC. EXPANSION OF PUCKBOARD SBRIR 2B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is REVACOMM INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-07. End: 2025-09-12.

What is REVACOMM INC.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly on similar software expansion projects?

Assessing REVACOMM INC.'s track record requires a deeper dive into their past performance on federal contracts. Specifically, examining previous awards from the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Air Force for software development, expansion, or related IT services would be crucial. Key metrics to analyze include on-time delivery rates, adherence to budget, quality of deliverables, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. Information on their experience with firm fixed-price contracts and definitive contract types would also be relevant. Without specific historical data on REVACOMM INC.'s performance on similar projects, it is difficult to definitively assess their capability to successfully execute this $13.5 million contract.

How does the $13.5 million contract value compare to similar software expansion projects within the DoD or Air Force?

To benchmark the $13.5 million contract value, we would need to compare it against similar definitive contracts awarded by the DoD or Air Force for software expansion over the past 3-5 years. Factors such as the scope of work (e.g., complexity of features, number of modules expanded), contract duration (1101 days), and the specific type of software being expanded are critical for a fair comparison. If comparable contracts for similar scope and duration were awarded at significantly lower or higher price points, it would indicate whether this contract represents good or questionable value. The firm fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty, but the initial award amount needs context from market rates for comparable services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential contractor underperformance by REVACOMM INC., schedule delays impacting the Air Force's operational needs, and the possibility of scope creep if requirements are not meticulously managed. Given the long duration (1101 days), technical challenges in software expansion are also a risk. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust project management by the Air Force, clear definition and enforcement of contract requirements, regular performance reviews, and potentially phased delivery schedules. The firm fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to manage costs, but the government must actively oversee progress and quality to ensure successful outcomes and mitigate risks.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach in ensuring competitive pricing for this software expansion?

The effectiveness of 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' in ensuring competitive pricing depends heavily on the specific reasons for excluding certain sources and the overall market landscape for this type of software expansion. While 'full and open' implies broad market solicitation, the exclusion clause suggests that not all potential vendors were considered. If the exclusions were justified and a sufficient number of qualified bidders still participated, it likely fostered competitive pricing. However, if the exclusions significantly limited the pool of capable contractors, it could potentially reduce competitive pressure and lead to less favorable pricing for the government compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

What is the historical spending pattern for puckboard software or similar IT solutions within the Department of the Air Force?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for puckboard software or analogous IT solutions within the Department of the Air Force is essential for contextualizing the current $13.5 million award. This involves examining previous contracts for similar software functionalities, development efforts, and maintenance over the last several fiscal years. Understanding the trend in spending – whether it's increasing, decreasing, or stable – can reveal market dynamics, technological shifts, and the agency's evolving requirements. Comparing the current contract's value and duration against historical averages for similar procurements can help determine if this represents a typical investment, an escalation, or a cost-saving measure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Software Publishers › Software Publishers

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 999

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 677 ALA MOANA BLVD, HONOLULU, HI, 96813

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,968,850

Exercised Options: $26,968,850

Current Obligation: $13,484,425

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline