DoD's $30.7M GDSS Enterprise Support Services contract awarded to TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,723,919 ($30.7M)
Contractor: Tri-Cor Industries, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-01-26
End Date: 2018-12-31
Contract Duration: 339 days
Daily Burn Rate: $90.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: GDSS ENTERPRISE SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: SCOTT AFB, SAINT CLAIR County, ILLINOIS, 62225
State: Illinois Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.7 million to TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC for work described as: GDSS ENTERPRISE SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the scope of IT enterprise support. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, typical for complex IT service contracts. 4. Performance context is within the standard for enterprise IT support services. 5. Sector positioning is within the IT services domain for defense agencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $30.7 million for enterprise IT support services over approximately one year appears within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT support contracts for federal agencies suggests that the pricing is competitive, especially considering the specialized nature of defense IT systems. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the overall value is contingent on the effective delivery of services and meeting performance metrics.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which should lead to more favorable pricing and service offerings for the government. The exclusion of sources clause suggests a specific reason for its use, which warrants further investigation into the technical requirements or existing infrastructure.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and encouraging a wider pool of qualified vendors to bid, potentially leading to better value.
Public Impact
The Department of the Air Force benefits from enhanced enterprise IT support, ensuring operational continuity. Services delivered include computer systems design and related support for critical defense infrastructure. Geographic impact is likely concentrated around Air Force installations where GDSS is utilized. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled IT professionals to be engaged in supporting defense systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in if specific proprietary systems are involved.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical enterprise support could pose continuity risks.
- Ensuring adequate performance metrics and oversight is crucial for this type of service contract.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- Award to TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. indicates they met the technical and performance requirements.
Sector Analysis
The IT services sector, particularly within the defense industry, is characterized by high demand for specialized support, cybersecurity, and system integration. This contract for enterprise support services fits within the broader market for IT consulting and managed services, which is a multi-billion dollar industry. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar large-scale IT support contracts within the federal government can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and opportunities for small business participation may be limited unless TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. voluntarily engages them. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral to potentially negative if they are excluded from prime contracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the contract's performance work statement and delivery order terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) IT Support Contracts
- Air Force Network Operations and Maintenance
- Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Support
- Cloud Computing Services for Defense
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues in complex IT environments.
- Cybersecurity risks associated with defense systems.
- Contractor dependency and potential for single-source reliance.
- Adequacy of competition and its impact on pricing.
Tags
it-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, computer-systems-design, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, enterprise-support, defense-contracting, information-technology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.7 million to TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. GDSS ENTERPRISE SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-01-26. End: 2018-12-31.
What is the track record of TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. in performing similar large-scale IT enterprise support contracts for the Department of Defense?
Assessing TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC.'s track record requires a review of their past performance on similar contracts. This would involve examining contract histories for on-time delivery, quality of service, adherence to budget, and customer satisfaction ratings. Specific details on their performance on previous large-scale DoD IT contracts, including any awards, penalties, or contract modifications, would provide crucial context for evaluating their capability to fulfill the GDSS Enterprise Support Services requirements. Without access to detailed performance data or past performance reviews, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability for this specific contract.
How does the awarded price of $30.7 million compare to the estimated market value for similar enterprise IT support services in the federal sector?
The awarded price of $30.7 million for approximately one year of enterprise IT support services needs to be benchmarked against similar federal contracts. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., help desk, network management, system administration, cybersecurity), the number of users supported, and the complexity of the IT environment are critical for comparison. If comparable contracts for similar-sized agencies or departments show significantly lower or higher costs for equivalent services, it would indicate whether this contract represents good or questionable value. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests cost control, but the ultimate value depends on the quality and efficiency of the services rendered.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Primary risks for this contract include potential performance shortfalls, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, contractor personnel turnover, and scope creep. Performance shortfalls could arise from inadequate staffing, insufficient expertise, or poor project management by TRI-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. Cybersecurity risks are inherent in supporting defense IT systems, requiring robust security protocols. High turnover among contractor staff could disrupt service continuity and knowledge transfer. Scope creep, if not managed effectively, could lead to cost overruns or delays. Mitigation strategies typically involve strong contract oversight, clearly defined performance metrics (SLAs), regular performance reviews, robust security requirements, and contingency planning for key personnel.
How effective has the Department of the Air Force been in managing similar IT support contracts in the past?
The effectiveness of the Department of the Air Force in managing similar IT support contracts can be evaluated by examining historical contract performance data, including contract close-outs, audit findings from the Inspector General, and any litigation or disputes. Agencies with a strong track record of effective contract management typically demonstrate consistent delivery of services, successful cost control, and minimal contract-related issues. Conversely, a history of contract failures, cost overruns, or significant performance problems might indicate challenges in oversight and management. Specific metrics on contract performance and user satisfaction for past IT support contracts would provide a clearer picture.
What has been the historical spending trend for GDSS Enterprise Support Services or similar IT support functions within the Department of Defense over the last five years?
Analyzing historical spending trends for GDSS Enterprise Support Services or comparable IT support functions within the DoD over the past five years would reveal patterns of investment and potential changes in scope or service providers. An increasing trend might indicate growing reliance on these services or expansion of the IT infrastructure, while a decreasing trend could suggest consolidation, efficiency gains, or shifts in technology. Comparing this contract's value ($30.7M) to the historical average or trend line would help determine if current spending is consistent, elevated, or reduced. This context is vital for understanding the long-term budgetary implications and strategic importance of these services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: FA445212R0002
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4403 FORBES BLVD, LANHAM, MD, 20706
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,723,919
Exercised Options: $30,723,919
Current Obligation: $30,723,919
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA445213D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-01-26
Current End Date: 2018-12-31
Potential End Date: 2018-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-10-18
More Contracts from Tri-Cor Industries, Inc
- MAF C2, Itv/Business Support Services — $23.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!600509!9700!hc1013!defense Info. Technology Contrac!gs35f4500g !C!N! !n!hc101306f2032!p00001!20051103!20070930!929566768!929566768!146881875!n!tri-Cor Industries Inc !5 Eagle CTR STE 8 !O Fallon !il!62269!68328!163!17!scott AFB !ST. Clair !illinois !+000007172125!n!n!000000000000!d399!other ADP & Telecommunication Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541519!A!A!6! ! !C! ! !99990909!B!E!Y! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !B!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $19.9M (Department of Defense)
- NON Personal Services — $10.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200301!000034!5700!QA27 !amc/Conf/Lgc !gs35f4500g !C!N! !y!fa445203f0031 !20021001!20030930!146881875!146881875!146881875!n!tri-Cor Industries, Inc !4600 Forbes Blvd, Suite 20!lanham !md!20706!68328!163!17!scott AFB !ST. Clair !illinois !+000001439638!n!n!000000000000!d399!other ADP & Telecommunication Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541519!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!b!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)