DoD's $349M R&D Contract for Technical Management Services Awarded to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $348,974,045 ($349.0M)

Contractor: Oasis Systems, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $239.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT & ADVISORY SERVICES (TMAS 2) 96TH CTG

Place of Performance

Location: EGLIN AFB, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32542

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $349.0 million to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT & ADVISORY SERVICES (TMAS 2) 96TH CTG Key points: 1. Significant investment in R&D for the Air Force, focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. 2. OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC, a single awardee, will provide technical management and advisory services. 3. The contract utilizes a Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing structure, common in R&D but requiring careful oversight. 4. This award falls under the broader TMAS 2 vehicle, suggesting potential for follow-on work or related contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure is typical for R&D where scope can evolve. However, it necessitates robust oversight to manage costs effectively and ensure value for money compared to fixed-price contracts for more defined scopes.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating a competitive process but with specific source exclusions. This method aims for competition while potentially leveraging specialized capabilities.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial value of this contract represents a significant taxpayer investment in research and development, with the ultimate return dependent on the successful outcomes of the projects undertaken.

Public Impact

Advancement of critical research and development projects within the Department of the Air Force. Potential for technological breakthroughs and innovations stemming from the contracted services. Economic impact through contract spending and potential job creation within the R&D sector. Ensuring the Department of Defense maintains a technological edge through advanced research.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

CPFF pricing requires diligent cost monitoring to prevent overruns.
Potential for scope creep in R&D projects.
Reliance on a single awardee for critical services.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a competitive vehicle (TMAS 2).
Focus on critical R&D areas for national security.
Long-term contract duration allows for sustained project development.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. Spending in this area is crucial for technological advancement and maintaining a competitive edge, with benchmarks varying widely based on the specific research domain.

Small Business Impact

The data provided does not indicate specific subcontracting goals or participation by small businesses in this particular award. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Given the CPFF structure and the R&D nature of the work, robust oversight from the Department of the Air Force is critical. This includes monitoring expenditures, progress, and adherence to research objectives to ensure accountability and value.

Related Government Programs

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Cost overrun potential due to CPFF structure.
Scope creep risk in R&D projects.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical services.
Need for robust government oversight and performance management.
Potential for evolving research needs requiring contract modifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $349.0 million to OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC. TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT & ADVISORY SERVICES (TMAS 2) 96TH CTG

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $349.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What specific R&D areas will OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC focus on under this contract, and how do they align with the Air Force's strategic priorities?

The contract specifies 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)' under NAICS code 541712. While the exact R&D focus areas are not detailed in the provided data, they are expected to align with the Air Force's strategic priorities for technological advancement, potentially including areas like advanced materials, aerospace engineering, cyber capabilities, or complex systems analysis to enhance operational effectiveness and national security.

What are the primary risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing model for this R&D contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risk with CPFF is the potential for cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. Mitigation strategies typically involve stringent cost monitoring, detailed reporting requirements, performance metrics, and clear definition of allowable costs. The Air Force must actively manage the scope and ensure efficient resource utilization to control expenditures and achieve value for the fixed fee.

How will the effectiveness of the technical management and advisory services provided by OASIS SYSTEMS, LLC be measured to ensure successful R&D outcomes?

Effectiveness will likely be measured through a combination of performance metrics tied to project milestones, delivery of research findings, adherence to budget, and the quality of advisory services. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) could include successful completion of research phases, innovation adoption, technical report quality, and contribution to strategic Air Force objectives. Regular reviews and feedback mechanisms will be crucial for assessing and ensuring successful R&D outcomes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 200 SUMMIT DR STE 510, BURLINGTON, MA, 01803

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $971,900,046

Exercised Options: $620,528,073

Current Obligation: $348,974,045

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 35

Total Subaward Amount: $43,769,185

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADS722

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline