Teledyne Brown Engineering awarded $11.2M contract for engineering services, with a 1020-day duration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,082,727 ($12.1M)
Contractor: Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2001-12-15
End Date: 2004-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,020 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200205!000102!5700!LA01 !11 CONS/LGCW !GS23F0424K !C!N! !N!F4964202FA057 !20011215!20020215!113633189!113633189!112358432!N!TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, IN!300 SPARKMAN DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000001217626!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20330, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.1 million to TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC. for work described as: 200205!000102!5700!LA01 !11 CONS/LGCW !GS23F0424K !C!N! !N!F4964202FA057 !20011215!20020215!113633189!113633189!112358432!N!TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, IN!300 SPARKMAN DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000001217626!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER… Key points: 1. Contract value of $11.2M over 1020 days suggests a daily rate of approximately $11,000. 2. Full and open competition indicates a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract's duration of over 2.5 years may present risks related to evolving requirements and cost escalation. 4. Performance context is limited, but the award suggests the contractor met initial requirements. 5. This contract falls within the 'Other Professional Services' category, indicating a broad range of potential engineering support. 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force, highlighting its strategic importance.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.2 million over 1020 days equates to roughly $11,000 per day. Without specific deliverables or scope details, it's challenging to benchmark this against similar contracts. However, for complex engineering services, this daily rate could be within a reasonable range, assuming highly specialized expertise is required. Further analysis would necessitate understanding the specific services rendered and comparing them to industry standards for similar government contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders indicates a degree of competition. While more bidders would typically lead to better price discovery, three offers suggest that the market for these specific engineering services is not overly concentrated.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and innovative solutions.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force, is the primary beneficiary, receiving engineering services. The services delivered are categorized as 'Other Professional Services,' likely encompassing a range of technical and analytical support. The geographic impact is centered around the contracting agency, with potential implications for personnel in Huntsville, AL, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may include the employment of engineers and technical specialists by Teledyne Brown Engineering.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (1020 days) increases the risk of scope creep and potential cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Limited public information on specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's track record on this particular award.
- The broad 'Other Professional Services' category could mask specialized needs where specific expertise might be scarce, potentially impacting future competition.
- Reliance on a single award for a significant period might limit opportunities for other firms to gain experience with this agency.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a fair process and potential for multiple qualified bidders.
- The contractor, Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc., has a physical presence and likely established operations in Huntsville, AL.
- The contract value, while substantial, is spread over a long period, potentially indicating a stable and predictable revenue stream for the contractor.
- The award signifies the Department of Defense's continued need for engineering support services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the broad 'Engineering Services' sector, specifically within 'Other Professional Services.' The market for government engineering services is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense being major consumers. This contract likely supports specific Air Force programs requiring specialized technical expertise. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the precise nature of the engineering services provided, but the overall market for defense-related engineering is robust.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication from the provided data that this contract included a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc., is a large business. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on the contractor's internal policies and the specific requirements of the engineering services, which are not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available, but detailed performance data and specific oversight activities are not readily accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Engineering Services Contracts
- Air Force Professional Services Awards
- Federal Engineering Support Contracts
- Long-Term Government Service Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of scope creep and cost overruns.
- Limited public data on specific performance metrics hinders full assessment.
- Broad service category may obscure specific risks or dependencies.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, engineering-services, professional-services, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, long-duration, huntsville-alabama, teledyne-brown-engineering, naics-541330, defense-sector
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.1 million to TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC.. 200205!000102!5700!LA01 !11 CONS/LGCW !GS23F0424K !C!N! !N!F4964202FA057 !20011215!20020215!113633189!113633189!112358432!N!TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, IN!300 SPARKMAN DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000001217626!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-12-15. End: 2004-09-30.
What specific engineering services does Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. provide under this contract?
The contract is broadly categorized under 'Other Professional Services' with a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of 541330 (Engineering Services). While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, this typically encompasses a wide range of activities such as design, analysis, testing, and consultation related to engineering projects. Given the award by the Department of the Air Force, these services could range from aerospace engineering support, systems engineering, technical analysis, or research and development support for Air Force platforms and programs. The contract's duration of 1020 days suggests a sustained need for these services over a significant period.
How does the $11.2 million contract value compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Air Force?
Benchmarking the $11.2 million value requires understanding the specific scope of work. However, for a contract spanning 1020 days (approximately 2.8 years), this equates to an average annual value of roughly $4 million. The Department of the Air Force awards numerous engineering services contracts, ranging from small, specialized task orders to large, multi-year programs. Without knowing the exact nature of the services (e.g., R&D, sustainment, acquisition support), direct comparison is difficult. However, $4 million annually for specialized engineering support is within the typical range for significant, but not necessarily top-tier, defense contracts. Factors like the level of security clearance required, the uniqueness of the expertise, and the criticality of the program would influence its relative value.
What are the key risks associated with a contract of this duration (1020 days)?
A contract duration of 1020 days presents several risks. Firstly, the 'long-tail' nature increases the potential for requirements to evolve significantly over the contract period, potentially leading to scope creep if not managed meticulously. This can result in cost overruns or the need for costly contract modifications. Secondly, technological advancements or changes in strategic priorities within the Air Force could render some aspects of the original scope of work obsolete or less relevant, impacting the contract's overall value and effectiveness. Thirdly, maintaining consistent performance and contractor engagement over such an extended period can be challenging, requiring robust oversight and performance management from the government. Finally, economic fluctuations or changes in budget allocations could impact funding stability for longer-term contracts.
What is Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?
Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. (TBE) has a substantial history of performing federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense. As a subsidiary of Teledyne Technologies, TBE has been involved in various complex engineering, space, and defense-related projects. Their portfolio often includes work on missile defense systems, space exploration initiatives, and advanced technology development. While specific performance details for every contract are not publicly available, their continued awards from agencies like the DoD suggest a generally positive track record and the ability to meet stringent government requirements. Their presence in Huntsville, Alabama, a hub for aerospace and defense activities, further indicates their deep integration within the sector.
How does the competition level (3 bidders) impact the value for taxpayers?
Having three bidders in a full and open competition generally provides a reasonable level of competition, which is beneficial for taxpayers. It suggests that multiple companies possessed the capability and interest to bid on this engineering services contract. This level of competition typically drives prices down compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario. However, more bidders could potentially lead to even greater price reductions or more innovative proposals. The key is that the competition was sufficient to prevent a single entity from dictating terms and price, thereby ensuring a more market-driven outcome and better value for the government's investment.
What is the significance of the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) in understanding this contract?
The NAICS code 541330, 'Engineering Services,' is crucial as it defines the primary industry and type of work performed. This code encompasses establishments primarily engaged in providing a wide range of engineering services, including civil, electrical, mechanical, and aeronautical engineering. For this specific contract awarded by the Department of the Air Force, it indicates that the work involves applying engineering principles and expertise to solve technical problems, design systems, or provide technical consultation. This classification helps in understanding the skill sets required, the potential market size for such services, and allows for comparison with other government contracts falling under the same industry classification.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (UEI: 112358432)
Address: 300 SPARKMAN DRIVE, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35805
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS23F0424K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-12-15
Current End Date: 2004-09-30
Potential End Date: 2004-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-08-17
More Contracts from Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.
- Systems Development&operations Support a Primary Mission of the Marshall Space Flight Center (msfc) IS to Support Nasa's Human Exploration and Development of Space (heds) Enterprise and the Office of Biological and Physical Research (obpr) Enterprise WHO ARE Working Together to Facilitate Long-Term Exploration of Space. Msfc Serves AS Nasa's Lead Center for the Materials Science and Biotechnology Disciplines and Serves Other Customers and Sponsors Within the Agency. the Purposes of This Contract ARE to Further the Science Goals of the Agency by 1) Developing, Operating and Maintaining Facilities and Payloads on the International Space Station (ISS) and Other Vehicles and Carriers, 2) Providing Science, Technical and Engineering Support to Investigators, and 3) Providing Management and Administrative Support to Msad. the Contractor Shall Provide the Necessary Management, Personnel, and Equipment/Supplies (NOT Otherwise Provided by the Government) Required to Perform the Engineering, Science and Technical Tasks Broadly Defined in This Statement of Work (SOW) and More Specifically Described in the Task/Delivery Order (order) and Technical Directives Issued by the Government. the Contractor Shall Provide the Planning, Coordination, Technical Direction, and Surveillance of the Activities Necessary to Assure Disciplined Performance of Work and Timely Application of Resources for the Accomplishment of ALL Orders Issued Under the Contract Approved by Msad. the Contractor Shall Establish, Implement, and Maintain a Financial Reporting System in Accordance With the Nasa FAR Supplement (NFS) 1852.242-73 and Nasa Procedures and Guidelines (NPG) 9501.2D. the Contractor Shall Provide the Overall Management Effort Required to Integrate Technical and Programmatic Functions Necessary for Achievement of the Objectives of the Contract. the Contractor Shall Develop, Submit, and Maintain Detailed Master Schedules Based on a Logic Driven Network That Supports Applicable Msad Project and ISS Program Managed Milestones. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible for Procurement Functions: the Contractor Shall Create, Maintain and Submit in the Format Specified by Msad, Miscellaneous Graphics, Presentations and Reports Supporting the Payloads and the Research Program, and the Major Msad Program Activities and Milestones. the Contractor Shall Define, Design, Develop, Fabricate, Assemble, Test, Deliver, Integrate and Operate Microgravity Science Payloads and Facilities. the Contractor Shall Define the Resources, Structure, Approach, and Processes Required to Complete the Final Design, Development, Fabrication, Assembly, Test, Integration, Operation, Maintenance, Support, and Retirement of the Required Hardware, Software, and Associated Infrastructure. the Contractor Shall Support or Conduct Technical Reviews Appropriate for Individual Payload Development and to Meet the Requirements of the Order — $397.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Mission Operations and Integration (MO&I) Contract. This Contract Involves Operations Support for ALL Phases of Flight Including Mission Preparation, Crew and Flight Controller Training, and Real-Time Operations Requirements for Spaceflight Operations Support. the Core Services Portion of the Contract Establishes Requirements for Payload Operations in Support of the International Space Station (ISS) Program, While Task Orders Issued Under the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Component Will Provide the Capability to ADD Operations Support for Other Program or Project Requirements — $371.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Marshall Operations Systems, Services, and Integration II (mossi II) — $253.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Production of FMS Boats U1, U2, and U3 — $237.7M (Department of Defense)
- Launch Vehicle/Stages Adapter — $205.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)