SECUREINFO CORPORATION awarded $10.8M contract for Electronic Computer Manufacturing by Department of Defense

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,814,503 ($10.8M)

Contractor: Secureinfo Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-12-12

End Date: 2007-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,845 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78243

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.8 million to SECUREINFO CORPORATION for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.8M over 5 years suggests a significant investment in electronic computer manufacturing capabilities. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The 'TIME AND MATERIALS' contract type may present cost control challenges if not closely monitored. 4. Awarded to SECUREINFO CORPORATION, a company with a track record in this sector. 5. The contract duration of 1845 days (approx. 5 years) allows for sustained support and development. 6. Geographic location in Texas (TX) may indicate regional economic impact and workforce implications.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award of $10.8M over approximately five years averages to about $2.16M annually. Without specific details on the deliverables, it's challenging to benchmark against similar contracts. The 'TIME AND MATERIALS' pricing structure, while flexible, can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently. Further analysis would require understanding the specific electronic components or manufacturing services procured and comparing their unit costs to market rates or historical government pricing for comparable items.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' suggesting that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this type of competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offering. A robust competition typically leads to more favorable pricing for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best possible price and quality for the required electronic computer manufacturing services. This approach reduces the risk of inflated costs often associated with less competitive procurements.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense is the primary beneficiary, receiving electronic computer manufacturing services. This contract supports the operational readiness and technological advancement of the Air Force. The geographic impact is centered in Texas (TX), potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the region. Workforce implications include skilled labor in electronic manufacturing, engineering, and related technical fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'TIME AND MATERIALS' contract type carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not managed with strict oversight and performance metrics.
Lack of specific performance metrics or detailed scope of work in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the true value and efficiency of the award.
The duration of the contract (5 years) could lead to technological obsolescence if the procured systems are not adaptable or upgradeable.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, which typically drives better pricing and quality.
The contract is with SECUREINFO CORPORATION, suggesting a potentially established relationship and understanding of requirements.
The significant award amount indicates a substantial need and commitment from the agency, potentially leading to stable operations for the contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Electronic Computer Manufacturing sector, a critical component of the defense industrial base. The market for defense-related electronics is substantial, driven by the need for advanced computing, communication, and sensor systems. Spending in this area is often characterized by long-term development cycles and high technological requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale contracts for similar electronic systems or manufacturing services awarded to defense contractors.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and there is no indication of a small business set-aside (ss). This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Consequently, the primary contractor, SECUREINFO CORPORATION, will likely be responsible for managing subcontracting opportunities. The extent to which small businesses will benefit depends on the prime contractor's subcontracting plan and the availability of small businesses capable of fulfilling specific requirements within the contract scope.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer (ACO) within the Department of the Air Force. Performance monitoring, invoicing, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Defense Electronics Manufacturing
Information Technology Services
Aerospace and Defense Contracting
Electronic Component Procurement
Government IT Infrastructure

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to 'TIME AND MATERIALS' contract type.
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
Risk of technological obsolescence over the 5-year contract duration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.8 million to SECUREINFO CORPORATION. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SECUREINFO CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-12-12. End: 2007-12-31.

What is the specific nature of the 'Electronic Computer Manufacturing' services or products being procured under this contract?

The provided data indicates the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 334111, which corresponds to 'Electronic Computer Manufacturing.' However, the specific nature of the services or products is not detailed. This could range from the manufacturing of custom computer hardware, assembly of specialized computing systems, to the production of components integral to larger defense systems. Without further details on the Statement of Work (SOW), it is difficult to ascertain the precise technological focus or the end-use applications of these manufactured goods. Understanding the specific deliverables is crucial for assessing the contract's technical relevance and value.

How does the $10.8M award compare to historical spending on similar electronic computer manufacturing contracts by the Department of Defense?

Benchmarking the $10.8M award requires access to historical contract data for similar 'Electronic Computer Manufacturing' (NAICS 334111) procurements by the Department of Defense (DoD) or the specific agency, the Air Force. A preliminary assessment suggests that $10.8M over five years is a moderate-sized contract. Larger programs might involve hundreds of millions or billions. However, the significance of this award depends heavily on the scope and complexity of the manufacturing involved. If it pertains to highly specialized, low-volume, or cutting-edge components, the value could be substantial relative to the market. Conversely, if it involves mass production of standard components, it might be considered smaller. A detailed analysis would involve querying contract databases for comparable awards based on NAICS code, agency, contract type, and duration.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate SECUREINFO CORPORATION's performance under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate SECUREINFO CORPORATION's performance. For a 'TIME AND MATERIALS' contract, performance is often assessed based on adherence to delivery schedules, quality of manufactured goods (e.g., defect rates, compliance with specifications), and efficient use of labor hours. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would typically monitor these aspects. Without explicit KPIs, assessing the contractor's value-for-money and overall effectiveness is challenging. It is expected that the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and associated contract clauses would outline these performance expectations and measurement criteria.

What is the potential risk associated with the 'TIME AND MATERIALS' contract type for this specific procurement?

The 'TIME AND MATERIALS' (T&M) contract type, while offering flexibility, carries inherent risks for the government, primarily related to cost control. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and for the actual cost of materials. This structure can incentivize longer task durations and potentially higher material costs if not managed rigorously. For the Department of Defense, the risk is that the total cost could exceed initial estimates if the scope of work is not well-defined or if the contractor's efficiency is not closely monitored. Effective oversight, including detailed tracking of labor hours, material receipts, and regular performance reviews, is crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure fair pricing.

What is the track record of SECUREINFO CORPORATION in fulfilling government contracts, particularly within the defense sector?

The provided data identifies SECUREINFO CORPORATION as the awardee but does not offer details on their specific track record with government contracts. To assess their reliability and past performance, one would need to consult government contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) to review their award history, past performance evaluations, and any reported issues or disputes. A positive track record with similar defense contracts, particularly in electronic computer manufacturing, would indicate a lower risk for this $10.8M award. Conversely, a history of performance issues, cost overruns, or missed deadlines on previous contracts would raise concerns about SECUREINFO CORPORATION's ability to successfully execute this new agreement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing › Electronic Computer Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Address: 4606 CENTERVIEW STE 200, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0292K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline