DoD Awards $18.3M for Electronics & Communication Equipment to General Dynamics Mission Systems

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,373,713 ($18.4M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-11-21

End Date: 2009-01-16

Contract Duration: 2,248 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200304!000050!5700!GV40 !ESC/IYK !F1962803C0005 !A!N! !N! !20021121!20030731!883234924!001381284!001381284!N!VERIDIAN SYSTEMS DIVISION, INC!3300 PLYMOUTH ROAD !ANN ARBOR !VA!48105!03000!161!26!ANN ARBOR !WASHTENAW !MICHIGAN !+000002407500!N!N!000004815000!AC65!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ENG/MANUF DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !334111!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!A!N!A! !D!N!J!1!001!N!1A!Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: YPSILANTI, WASHTENAW County, MICHIGAN, 48197

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: 200304!000050!5700!GV40 !ESC/IYK !F1962803C0005 !A!N! !N! !20021121!20030731!883234924!001381284!001381284!N!VERIDIAN SYSTEMS DIVISION, INC!3300 PLYMOUTH ROAD !ANN ARBOR !VA!48105!03000!161!26!ANN ARBOR !WASHT… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to General Dynamics Mission Systems for electronics and communication equipment. 2. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price. 3. The contract was not competed, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. This spending falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to IT and R&D.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $18.3M is significant. Without specific unit details or comparable contract data, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests potential for overpricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This method can lead to higher prices as there is no competitive pressure to drive down costs.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in taxpayers paying a premium for the goods or services received.

Public Impact

Defense spending on critical communication equipment. Potential for increased costs due to non-competitive award. Impact on technological advancement in defense electronics. Role of General Dynamics Mission Systems in national security.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 81 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Firm Fixed Price on a sole-source award

Positive Signals

  • Definitive contract award
  • Long-term duration

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Defense sector, specifically for electronics and communication equipment manufacturing. Spending benchmarks for this category can vary widely based on technological complexity and quantity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded to a large business (General Dynamics Mission Systems). There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants further oversight to ensure fair pricing and justification for the lack of competition. Contract performance should be monitored closely.

Related Government Programs

  • Electronic Computer Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited transparency on price justification
  • No clear small business participation

Tags

electronic-computer-manufacturing, department-of-defense, mi, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.. 200304!000050!5700!GV40 !ESC/IYK !F1962803C0005 !A!N! !N! !20021121!20030731!883234924!001381284!001381284!N!VERIDIAN SYSTEMS DIVISION, INC!3300 PLYMOUTH ROAD !ANN ARBOR !VA!48105!03000!161!26!ANN ARBOR !WASHTENAW !MICHIGAN !+000002407500!N!N!000004815000!AC65!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ENG/MANUF DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !334111!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-11-21. End: 2009-01-16.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable?

The justification for not competing this contract is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source awards require a detailed justification, such as unique capabilities or urgent need. The method used to determine price fairness and reasonableness in the absence of competition is also not specified, highlighting a potential oversight area.

What are the specific electronic and communication components being procured, and are there alternative solutions available?

The specific components are classified under PSC code 334111 (Electronic Computer Manufacturing) and described broadly as 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION'. Without more detailed specifications, it's difficult to assess alternatives. However, the lack of competition suggests that either General Dynamics holds unique intellectual property or the government has not explored other market options.

How does the firm fixed price compare to industry benchmarks for similar electronics and communication equipment, considering the sole-source nature?

Comparing the firm fixed price to industry benchmarks is challenging without detailed specifications and quantity. However, sole-source contracts inherently lack the price pressure of competition. Therefore, it is crucial to have robust cost analysis and justification to ensure the price paid by taxpayers is fair and reasonable, even if it appears higher than potentially competitive bids.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingComputer and Peripheral Equipment ManufacturingElectronic Computer Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 12450 FAIR LAKES CIR STE 800, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2002-11-21

Current End Date: 2009-01-16

Potential End Date: 2009-01-16 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-02-22

More Contracts from General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending