Raytheon Awarded $399.6M for Research & Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $399,644,123 ($399.6M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1999-07-12

End Date: 2005-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,272 days

Daily Burn Rate: $175.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 199912!5700!0510!GJ05 !WR-ALC/LRK !F0960499C0050 !A!*!* !19990712!20040930!053387429!045591104!001339159!N!04071!RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS, INC !7700 ARLINGTON BLVD !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !0001!+000000200712!N!N!000000000000!B599!OTHER SPECIAL STUDIES & ANALYSES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3AUJ!U-2 !8711!3!*!*!*!B!N!Z!A !N!J!2!002!N!6A!Z!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!D!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: STERLING, LOUDOUN County, VIRGINIA, 20166

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $399.6 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: 199912!5700!0510!GJ05 !WR-ALC/LRK !F0960499C0050 !A!*!* !19990712!20040930!053387429!045591104!001339159!N!04071!RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS, INC !7700 ARLINGTON BLVD !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS … Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Raytheon E-Systems, Inc. for R&D services. 2. Significant contract value of $399.6 million over its duration. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 4. Sector is Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 5. Contract duration spans from July 1999 to September 2005.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is substantial at $399.6 million. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for similar R&D contracts, a precise value assessment is difficult. The 'Other Special Studies & Analyses' and 'All Other Supplies and Equipment' categories suggest a broad scope that could impact per-unit cost analysis.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a limited competition. This method might not have resulted in the most competitive pricing possible, as potential bidders were excluded.

Taxpayer Impact: The significant contract value suggests a substantial taxpayer investment. The limited competition raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible value for this R&D expenditure.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are funding extensive research and development activities. The contract supports advancements in physical, engineering, and life sciences. The duration of the contract (nearly 6 years) indicates a long-term investment. The specific nature of the R&D is not detailed, limiting public understanding of its direct impact.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition may have inflated costs.
Lack of detailed R&D specifics hinders public oversight.
Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or cost overruns.

Positive Signals

Awarded to a known entity, Raytheon E-Systems, Inc.
Contract supports critical R&D in key scientific fields.
Definitive contract type provides a framework for services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Spending in this sector is crucial for innovation but can be complex to benchmark due to the unique nature of R&D projects and the varying levels of risk and potential return.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award, and opportunities for subcontracting are not explicitly detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense through the Defense Contract Management Agency. Further oversight details regarding performance reviews, milestones, and accountability mechanisms are not provided in this data snippet.

Related Government Programs

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition raises value concerns.
Lack of R&D specifics hinders transparency.
Potential for cost overruns due to long duration.
Unclear performance metrics for R&D effectiveness.
Exclusion of sources may have limited innovation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $399.6 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. 199912!5700!0510!GJ05 !WR-ALC/LRK !F0960499C0050 !A!*!* !19990712!20040930!053387429!045591104!001339159!N!04071!RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS, INC !7700 ARLINGTON BLVD !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !0001!+000000200712!N!N!000000000000!B599!OTHER SPECIAL STUDIES & ANALYSES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!3AUJ!U-2 !8711!3!*!*!*!B!N!Z!A !N!J!2!0

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $399.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-07-12. End: 2005-09-30.

What specific R&D projects were undertaken, and what were the key deliverables or breakthroughs achieved under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the 'Other Special Studies & Analyses' or the 'U-2' related work. Understanding the specific research objectives, methodologies, and tangible outcomes is crucial for assessing the true value and effectiveness of this significant taxpayer investment. Without this detail, it's difficult to gauge the scientific or technological advancements realized.

How did the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process ensure fair pricing and maximize competition for these R&D services?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were deliberately excluded. The rationale for these exclusions and the subsequent price discovery process are not detailed. This raises questions about whether the government secured the most competitive pricing and innovative solutions available in the market.

What metrics were used to evaluate the success and effectiveness of Raytheon E-Systems' R&D performance over the contract's nearly six-year duration?

The data does not provide information on the performance evaluation criteria or metrics used to assess the effectiveness of Raytheon E-Systems' R&D efforts. Given the substantial investment and long duration, understanding how performance was measured, whether milestones were met, and the overall impact of the research is essential for accountability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 7700 ARLINGTON BLVD, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline