DoD's $24.7M Navy Medicine CIS Training Contract Awarded to Loui Consulting Group Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,665,529 ($24.7M)

Contractor: Loui Consulting Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-09-08

End Date: 2016-02-27

Contract Duration: 1,267 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: PROVIDE CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS (CIS) AND ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS INITIAL AND SUSTAINMENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NAVY MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT ACTIVITY (NAVMISSA).

Place of Performance

Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78201

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.7 million to LOUI CONSULTING GROUP, INC. for work described as: PROVIDE CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS (CIS) AND ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS INITIAL AND SUSTAINMENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NAVY MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT ACTIVITY (NAVMISSA). Key points: 1. The contract focuses on essential clinical information systems training and support for Navy Medicine. 2. Loui Consulting Group, Inc. secured the award through a full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is 1267 days, indicating a significant, long-term support requirement. 4. The primary service category is Engineering Services, suggesting a technical and specialized nature of the training.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.7M over approximately 3.5 years appears reasonable for specialized IT training and support services within a large federal agency like the Department of the Navy.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The award was made under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Competitive bidding in this full and open process likely resulted in a fair market price, maximizing taxpayer value for critical medical IT support.

Public Impact

Ensures continuity of care by maintaining the proficiency of medical personnel on vital information systems. Supports the operational readiness of Navy Medicine's IT infrastructure. Potential for improved patient care through effective use of clinical information systems. Contributes to the modernization and efficiency of military healthcare delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if follow-on contracts are not competitively bid.
Reliance on a single vendor for critical training could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a robust market and potential for competitive pricing.
Long-term contract indicates a stable and ongoing need for these services.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs for the government.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to IT systems support. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining modern healthcare infrastructure, with benchmarks varying widely based on system complexity and user base size.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award, though they may participate as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for contract performance and financial management. The firm fixed price structure also aids in cost oversight.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may lead to technology obsolescence.
Sole vendor reliance for critical training could impact service continuity.
Potential for scope creep in sustainment services.
Lack of small business participation in prime contract.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.7 million to LOUI CONSULTING GROUP, INC.. PROVIDE CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS (CIS) AND ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS INITIAL AND SUSTAINMENT TRAINING AND SUPPORT SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE NAVY MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT ACTIVITY (NAVMISSA).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOUI CONSULTING GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-09-08. End: 2016-02-27.

What is the specific scope of 'associated applications' included in the training and support services?

The specific 'associated applications' are not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive understanding would require reviewing the contract's Statement of Work (SOW). These likely include modules or related software that integrate with the core Clinical Information System (CIS), such as electronic health records (EHR), scheduling, billing, or laboratory systems, crucial for seamless healthcare operations.

How will the effectiveness of the training be measured to ensure optimal system utilization and patient care?

Effectiveness is typically measured through metrics defined in the SOW, such as trainee proficiency assessments, post-training system usage rates, reduction in user errors, and feedback surveys. For patient care, indirect measures might include improved data accuracy, faster access to patient information, and enhanced system uptime, all contributing to better clinical decision-making and operational efficiency.

What is the potential impact on Navy Medicine's IT budget if sustainment costs exceed initial projections?

The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract structure is designed to mitigate this risk by locking in the price. However, if the scope of 'sustainment' expands significantly beyond what was anticipated during the initial competition, the government might face challenges or need to negotiate change orders. This could lead to budget overruns if not managed carefully through contract modifications or future competitive procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002412R3190

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 91 GREEN ST, WARNER ROBINS, GA, 31093

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Emerging Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,665,529

Exercised Options: $24,665,529

Current Obligation: $24,665,529

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017809D5771

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline