EPA's $14.4M Environmental Consulting Contract Awarded to General Dynamics IT Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,391,224 ($14.4M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2009-04-15

End Date: 2014-10-14

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MISSION SUPPORT FOR CLEAN AIR MARKETS AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $14.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: MISSION SUPPORT FOR CLEAN AIR MARKETS AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $14.4 million, was awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. for environmental consulting services. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration spans from April 2009 to October 2014, covering a significant period. 4. The primary sector is Environmental Consulting Services, aligning with the EPA's mission.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting contracts is difficult without more specific service details.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' suggesting a competitive process that aimed to maximize participation while potentially excluding specific entities for defined reasons. This method generally supports price discovery through multiple bids.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests efforts to secure fair pricing, but the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure warrants scrutiny to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

Supports EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment. Provides essential environmental consulting services, potentially impacting regulatory compliance and policy development. The long contract duration suggests ongoing and critical support needs for environmental programs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Consulting Services sector, which is crucial for government agencies like the EPA to manage and execute environmental programs. Spending benchmarks in this niche can vary widely based on the complexity and scope of services required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the prime contractor is General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., a large business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this specific contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. However, the provided data does not detail specific oversight activities or accountability measures for this particular contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-consulting-services, environmental-protection-agency, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $14.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. MISSION SUPPORT FOR CLEAN AIR MARKETS AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-04-15. End: 2014-10-14.

How effectively did the 'exclusion of sources' clause in the full and open competition impact the final price and the range of innovative solutions considered?

The exclusion of sources, while potentially justified, could limit the competitive landscape, possibly leading to a higher price than if all potential sources were allowed to bid. It might also restrict the diversity of innovative approaches brought to the table. A thorough review would assess if the exclusion was necessary and if it ultimately served the government's best interest in terms of cost and technical merit.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how were they measured to ensure effective delivery of environmental consulting services?

The provided data lacks specific details on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or how they were measured. For a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, robust KPIs are essential to ensure the contractor is delivering value and meeting objectives efficiently. Without this information, assessing the effectiveness of the services rendered and the overall value for taxpayer money is challenging.

Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, what mechanisms were in place to control costs and prevent potential overruns or inefficiencies?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts require strong oversight to manage costs effectively. Mechanisms typically include detailed audits, regular reviews of expenditures, and strict adherence to the defined scope of work. The effectiveness of cost control would depend on the EPA's diligence in monitoring the contractor's spending and ensuring all costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable under the contract terms.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesEnvironmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: PRHQ0712709

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 4300 FAIR LAKES CT, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $37,775,751

Exercised Options: $27,867,633

Current Obligation: $14,391,224

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-04-15

Current End Date: 2014-10-14

Potential End Date: 2014-10-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-10-26

More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

View all Environmental Protection Agency contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending