EPA Spends $15.8M on Lead Soil Remediation, Prudent Technologies Awarded Contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,863,678 ($15.9M)
Contractor: Prudent Technologies, Inc
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2007-04-04
End Date: 2010-06-05
Contract Duration: 1,158 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: REMEDIATION OF LEAD CONTAMINATED SOIL AT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
Place of Performance
Location: OMAHA, DOUGLAS County, NEBRASKA, 68108
State: Nebraska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $15.9 million to PRUDENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC for work described as: REMEDIATION OF LEAD CONTAMINATED SOIL AT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Prudent Technologies, Inc. for $15.8M. 2. Focus on remediation of lead-contaminated soil at residential properties. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 4. Contract duration was 1158 days. 5. No small business participation noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $15.8M for remediation services appears within a reasonable range for large-scale environmental cleanup projects. However, without specific details on the scope of work and the extent of contamination, a precise benchmark is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting price discovery and competitive pressure.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental remediation, which is a necessary public service. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing the best value for taxpayers is a key consideration.
Public Impact
Protects public health by removing hazardous lead from residential areas. Addresses environmental justice concerns by targeting contaminated properties. Potential for long-term health benefits and increased property values in remediated areas.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition method may have impacted price.
- No small business participation.
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical environmental health issue.
- Contract completed within original duration.
- Awarded by a reputable agency (EPA).
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Spending benchmarks for such contracts vary widely based on project scope, location, and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This suggests that the contract may have been too large or specialized for small businesses to compete effectively, or that specific outreach was not undertaken.
Oversight & Accountability
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard oversight procedures for environmental remediation projects would apply, including monitoring progress, quality of work, and adherence to safety and environmental regulations.
Related Government Programs
- Remediation Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may have inflated costs.
- Time and Materials contract type carries inherent cost risk.
- Lack of small business involvement.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope was not tightly managed.
Tags
remediation-services, environmental-protection-agency, ne, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $15.9 million to PRUDENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. REMEDIATION OF LEAD CONTAMINATED SOIL AT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PRUDENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-04-04. End: 2010-06-05.
What was the specific rationale for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and how did this impact the final price?
The rationale for excluding sources typically relates to specific technical requirements, past performance, or unique capabilities needed for the project. Understanding these exclusions is crucial to assessing whether the competition truly yielded the best value. If only a few qualified bidders remained, the price might be higher than in a truly open competition.
How does the final cost of $15.8M compare to the initial estimated cost or benchmark for similar lead soil remediation projects of this scale?
Without access to the initial estimates or detailed project scope, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $15.8 million for remediating lead-contaminated soil across multiple residential properties suggests a significant undertaking. Benchmarking would require data on the acreage treated, the depth of contamination, and the specific remediation techniques employed.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how effectively were they met to ensure the remediation was successful and taxpayer funds were well-spent?
Key performance indicators likely included the percentage of lead contamination reduced to safe levels, adherence to environmental safety protocols during remediation, and timely completion of work. Effective oversight by the EPA would ensure these KPIs were met, confirming the successful remediation and responsible use of taxpayer funds.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 8080 WARD PKWY STE 405, KANSAS CITY, MO, 05
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,863,678
Exercised Options: $15,863,678
Current Obligation: $15,863,678
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: EPS70706
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-04-04
Current End Date: 2010-06-05
Potential End Date: 2010-06-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-07-19
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)