ARTCC Modernization Project Awarded to Cobalt Contractors for $12.6M, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,627,415 ($12.6M)

Contractor: Cobalt Contractors LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2007-09-21

End Date: 2014-07-11

Contract Duration: 2,485 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: ARTCC MODERNIZATION OF THE AUTOMATION WING 2ND FLOOR AND ATTIC (AWR2) AND THE CONTROL ROOM 1ST FLOOR M-1 AREA 4 AND ATTIC SPACE COMBINED PROJECTS AT THE LOS ANGELES ARTCC, PALMDALE, CA.

Place of Performance

Location: LAS VEGAS, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89109

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $12.6 million to COBALT CONTRACTORS LLC for work described as: ARTCC MODERNIZATION OF THE AUTOMATION WING 2ND FLOOR AND ATTIC (AWR2) AND THE CONTROL ROOM 1ST FLOOR M-1 AREA 4 AND ATTIC SPACE COMBINED PROJECTS AT THE LOS ANGELES ARTCC, PALMDALE, CA. Key points: 1. The project involves building construction at the Los Angeles ARTCC, Palmdale, CA. 2. Awarded to Cobalt Contractors LLC for $12.6 million. 3. The contract was not competed, raising concerns about price discovery. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $12.6 million for building modernization is significant. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to similar projects.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition may have led to a higher price than could have been achieved through a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for this modernization project.

Public Impact

Modernization of critical air traffic control facilities ensures operational efficiency. The project's location in Palmdale, CA, impacts local employment and economic activity. Lack of competition raises questions about the government's commitment to maximizing taxpayer value.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a sector that can vary widely in cost based on project scope and location. Benchmarks for similar modernization projects are essential for evaluating value.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not competed and there is no indication of small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were excluded or if the nature of the work precluded their involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential gap in oversight regarding the justification for avoiding a competitive process. Accountability for ensuring fair pricing and maximizing value is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-transportation, nv, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $12.6 million to COBALT CONTRACTORS LLC. ARTCC MODERNIZATION OF THE AUTOMATION WING 2ND FLOOR AND ATTIC (AWR2) AND THE CONTROL ROOM 1ST FLOOR M-1 AREA 4 AND ATTIC SPACE COMBINED PROJECTS AT THE LOS ANGELES ARTCC, PALMDALE, CA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COBALT CONTRACTORS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-21. End: 2014-07-11.

What was the justification for not competing this significant building modernization contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A thorough review would require accessing the contract file to understand the specific justification, such as urgency, unique capabilities of the contractor, or other factors that may have led the agency to bypass the standard competitive bidding process.

How does the $12.6 million cost compare to similar ARTCC modernization projects?

Without access to a database of comparable ARTCC modernization projects, it is difficult to provide a precise benchmark. However, the lack of competition makes it challenging to ascertain if this price represents good value. A comparative analysis with projects of similar scope, size, and complexity, ideally those awarded competitively, would be necessary.

What is the potential risk to taxpayers due to the lack of competition?

The primary risk to taxpayers is the potential for paying an inflated price. When a contract is not competed, the government loses the benefit of market forces driving down costs. This can lead to overspending if the sole-source price is not rigorously negotiated and justified.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3044 S HIGHLAND DR, LAS VEGAS, NV, 90

Business Categories: American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,698,955

Exercised Options: $12,627,415

Current Obligation: $12,627,415

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-09-21

Current End Date: 2014-07-11

Potential End Date: 2014-07-11 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-07-30

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending