DOT's $11M DAFIS UDO RECONSTRUCT contract awarded to Carmon Construction Inc. in 2003

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,976,388 ($11.0M)

Contractor: Carmon Construction Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2003-10-10

End Date: 2008-02-29

Contract Duration: 1,603 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DAFIS UDO RECONSTRUCT W/O ADVANCE

Place of Performance

Location: ALBERTVILLE, MARSHALL County, ALABAMA, 35950

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $11.0 million to CARMON CONSTRUCTION INC for work described as: DAFIS UDO RECONSTRUCT W/O ADVANCE Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.98 million for building construction. 2. Awarded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 3. Contract duration was 1603 days. 4. No small business participation noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is substantial for a construction project of this nature. Without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects, assessing its pricing against similar contracts is difficult. The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status further complicates value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited or sole-source procurement. This significantly restricts price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a competitive process, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Construction projects of this scale can impact local economies through job creation and material sourcing. The FAA's infrastructure investments are crucial for maintaining safe and efficient air travel. Long contract durations can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Long contract duration
No small business participation

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type can offer cost certainty if scope is well-defined.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on infrastructure needs and economic conditions. Benchmarks are difficult without specific project details.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation (sb: false). This suggests that opportunities for small businesses were either not sought or not met in this particular procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status raises questions about the justification for not seeking competitive bids. Further oversight would be needed to confirm the necessity of this approach and ensure fair pricing.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Transportation Contracting
Federal Aviation Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing.
Long contract duration increases risk of scope creep and cost escalation.
Absence of small business participation limits economic opportunity.
Limited data on project justification and outcomes hinders effectiveness assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $11.0 million to CARMON CONSTRUCTION INC. DAFIS UDO RECONSTRUCT W/O ADVANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CARMON CONSTRUCTION INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-10-10. End: 2008-02-29.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract without competition, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable in its absence?

The justification for awarding the contract without competition is not provided in the data. Typically, agencies must demonstrate specific circumstances, such as urgent and compelling needs or unique capabilities, to bypass full and open competition. Price reasonableness in such cases is often determined through historical price analysis, comparison to independent cost estimates, or negotiation with a single source.

What were the key performance metrics and outcomes of this reconstruction project, and did they align with the FAA's objectives for facility improvement?

The provided data does not include details on key performance metrics or project outcomes. Assessing alignment with FAA objectives would require reviewing project completion reports, post-occupancy evaluations, and any documented performance against initial requirements. Without this information, it's impossible to determine the project's effectiveness.

Given the long duration and lack of competition, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost increases and ensure the contractor maintained performance standards?

As a Firm Fixed Price contract, the primary mechanism for cost control is the fixed price itself, shifting most cost overrun risk to the contractor. However, effective oversight is still crucial to ensure the contractor meets performance standards and to manage any scope changes. The long duration necessitates robust contract management to prevent scope creep and ensure adherence to the original terms.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 136 E MAIN ST, ALBERTVILLE, AL, 04

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,185,858

Exercised Options: $10,976,388

Current Obligation: $10,976,388

Timeline