FAA Awards $27.1M for Satellite Guidance Support to AS AND D, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,113,015 ($27.1M)

Contractor: AS and D, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2007-08-03

End Date: 2015-08-05

Contract Duration: 2,924 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ESTABLISH NAS SATELLITE GUIDANCE SUPPORT TASK, AJW-191, INCREMENTAL FUNDING

Place of Performance

Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20770, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $27.1 million to AS AND D, LLC for work described as: ESTABLISH NAS SATELLITE GUIDANCE SUPPORT TASK, AJW-191, INCREMENTAL FUNDING Key points: 1. Contract awarded to AS AND D, LLC for engineering services. 2. The contract has a total value of $27.1 million. 3. Funding is incremental, suggesting phased project execution. 4. The sector is Engineering Services, a common area for federal contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $27.1 million for engineering services appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar FAA contracts for satellite guidance support would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential services.

Public Impact

Supports critical FAA operations related to satellite guidance. Ensures continued functionality of navigation and air traffic management systems. Impacts aviation safety and efficiency through reliable guidance support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Incremental funding may lead to budget uncertainty if future increments are not approved.
  • Long contract duration (2007-2015) could indicate potential for scope creep or evolving requirements.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition suggests a robust market and fair pricing.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services, particularly those related to aerospace and navigation systems, are crucial for the Federal Aviation Administration. Spending in this area is benchmarked against the overall federal IT and professional services budgets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was a goal or if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration, subject to standard federal procurement oversight. The incremental funding structure requires ongoing monitoring of budget allocation and performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Transportation Contracting
  • Federal Aviation Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration
  • Incremental funding
  • Potential for scope creep
  • Lack of small business award

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-transportation, md, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $27.1 million to AS AND D, LLC. ESTABLISH NAS SATELLITE GUIDANCE SUPPORT TASK, AJW-191, INCREMENTAL FUNDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AS AND D, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-08-03. End: 2015-08-05.

What specific satellite guidance systems does this task support, and what is the criticality of these systems to current FAA operations?

This task supports the NAS Satellite Guidance Support, crucial for the National Airspace System's navigation and air traffic management. Its criticality lies in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of aircraft positioning and guidance, directly impacting aviation safety and operational efficiency. Understanding the specific systems involved would clarify the precise technical requirements and the impact of any potential disruptions.

Given the contract's duration and incremental funding, what are the potential risks associated with long-term sustainment and evolving technological needs?

The long duration (2007-2015) and incremental funding present risks of technological obsolescence and budget instability. Evolving satellite technology and FAA requirements could outpace the contract's scope, necessitating costly modifications or new procurements. Incremental funding also means future phases are not guaranteed, potentially disrupting continuous support if subsequent appropriations are not approved.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure value for money for this extensive engineering support contract?

The full and open competition process is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids, which typically drives down prices. For this $27.1 million contract, it suggests that a competitive market existed for these specialized engineering services. However, true value for money also depends on the quality of services delivered and whether the final cost reflects the actual needs and market rates over the contract's extended period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (UEI: 076637073)

Address: 3900 C STREET, STE-802, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $620,087,899

Exercised Options: $27,113,015

Current Obligation: $27,113,015

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTFAAC07D00048

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-08-03

Current End Date: 2015-08-05

Potential End Date: 2015-08-05 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-08-12

More Contracts from AS and D, LLC

View all AS and D, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending