Commerce Dept. awards $10.2M contract for export license control program implementation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,197,458 ($10.2M)

Contractor: Commonwealth Trading Partners Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2005-01-05

End Date: 2006-03-31

Contract Duration: 450 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION FOR EXPORT LICENSE CONTROL PROGRAM

Place of Performance

Location: SILVER SPRING, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20910

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $10.2 million to COMMONWEALTH TRADING PARTNERS INC for work described as: ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION FOR EXPORT LICENSE CONTROL PROGRAM Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year administrative management service. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Contract duration of 450 days aligns with typical project timelines. 5. The administrative management and general management consulting services are crucial for regulatory functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $10.2 million for approximately 15 months of service appears to be within a reasonable range for administrative management and general management consulting. Benchmarking against similar contracts for program implementation services of this scope and duration would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract is a positive indicator, as it shifts cost risk to the contractor and encourages efficient performance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely invited to bid. This competitive process is expected to drive down prices and ensure the government receives the best value. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests a robust market for these services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that leads to more cost-effective solutions and potentially lower overall contract costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Commerce and its agencies, ensuring effective implementation of export license control programs. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting, vital for regulatory operations. The geographic impact is likely national, supporting federal regulatory functions. Workforce implications may involve specialized consultants contributing to program efficiency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract type reduces financial risk for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market and potential for good value.
The contract supports a critical government function related to export controls.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is vital for government operations, providing expertise in areas like program management, policy implementation, and operational efficiency. The market size for such services is substantial, with numerous firms capable of supporting federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unknown, though larger prime contractors may engage small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of Commerce. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Specific accountability measures would be detailed in the contract's statement of work and performance standards.

Related Government Programs

Export Administration Act
Bureau of Industry and Security Programs
International Trade Administration

Risk Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics
Limited contractor performance history available
No details on small business subcontracting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $10.2 million to COMMONWEALTH TRADING PARTNERS INC. ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION FOR EXPORT LICENSE CONTROL PROGRAM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMMONWEALTH TRADING PARTNERS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-01-05. End: 2006-03-31.

What is the track record of Commonwealth Trading Partners Inc. in performing similar government contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Commonwealth Trading Partners Inc. in performing similar government contracts is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous federal awards. This would help determine their experience and capability in managing administrative management and general management consulting services, particularly for export license control programs.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or budget for this service?

The provided data does not include the estimated value or budget for this service, making a direct comparison impossible. The awarded amount of $10.2 million is for the full contract value. To assess value, one would need to compare this to independent cost estimates, historical spending on similar programs, or benchmark data from other agencies performing comparable functions. Without this context, it's difficult to definitively state if the award represents optimal value for taxpayer money.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance measured?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and performance measurement methods for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such contracts would include a Performance Work Statement (PWS) outlining deliverables, timelines, and quality standards. Performance would likely be assessed through regular reviews, milestone achievements, and adherence to project schedules and objectives related to the implementation of the export license control program.

What is the potential risk associated with the contractor's ability to deliver on this contract?

The primary risk indicators available are the contract type and competition level. The firm fixed-price contract type generally mitigates financial risk for the government. Full and open competition suggests a market with capable vendors. However, without specific information on the contractor's past performance, financial stability, or the complexity of the program, a full risk assessment cannot be made. Potential risks could include schedule delays, quality issues, or unforeseen technical challenges.

How has federal spending on export license control program implementation evolved over time?

The provided data is for a single contract awarded in 2005. To understand the evolution of federal spending on export license control program implementation, a broader analysis of historical spending across multiple contracts, agencies, and fiscal years would be necessary. This would involve examining trends, identifying major program changes, and understanding the factors driving spending fluctuations, such as policy shifts or global trade dynamics.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1240 N PITT ST FL 1, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $210,930,257

Exercised Options: $88,414,726

Current Obligation: $10,197,458

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DOCDG135105CQ1003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline