Army awards $11.9M MATOC for highway, street, and bridge construction in New Mexico

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,975,246 ($12.0M)

Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-09-28

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 733 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MATOC

Place of Performance

Location: SANTA TERESA, DONA ANA County, NEW MEXICO, 88008

State: New Mexico Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.0 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: MATOC Key points: 1. Contract awarded to TETRA TECH, INC. for construction services. 2. The contract type is a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC). 3. This award represents a portion of the Army's broader infrastructure investment strategy. 4. The contract duration is 733 days. 5. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 237310. 7. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $11.9 million. Without specific task order details or comparable project data, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the fixed-price contract type suggests a degree of cost certainty for the government. Benchmarking against similar construction contracts for highway, street, and bridge work in the region would be necessary for a more robust value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the full and open nature suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential contractors, driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives the best possible value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and potentially other federal agencies requiring infrastructure development. Services delivered include highway, street, and bridge construction. The geographic impact is focused on New Mexico. The contract supports the construction workforce in the relevant trades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific task order details makes it hard to assess performance on individual projects.
Limited information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.
The contract's duration of approximately two years may not align with long-term infrastructure needs.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability.
MATOC structure allows for flexibility in awarding task orders as needed.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, specifically focusing on transportation infrastructure. The NAICS code 237310 covers establishments primarily engaged in the construction or reconstruction of highways, streets, bridges, and tunnels. Spending in this sector is often driven by government infrastructure initiatives and economic stimulus programs. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the average cost of similar bridge and highway projects awarded by federal, state, and local governments.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is TETRA TECH, INC., there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans or goals for small businesses within this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. The MATOC structure allows for oversight at both the master contract level and individual task order levels. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and Inspector General involvement would depend on the nature and value of individual task orders issued under this contract.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Federal Highway Administration Contracts
Department of Transportation Infrastructure Projects
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if task orders are not well-defined or if market prices fluctuate significantly.
Administrative burden of managing multiple task orders under a MATOC.
Need for robust oversight to ensure consistent quality and performance across task orders.
Limited duration may restrict the overall scope of work achievable.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.0 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. MATOC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-28. End: 2009-09-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for TETRA TECH, INC. with the Department of the Army for construction services?

To assess TETRA TECH, INC.'s historical spending with the Department of the Army for construction services, one would need to query federal procurement databases like FPDS or USASpending. This would involve filtering awards by contractor name, agency (Department of the Army), and relevant NAICS codes (e.g., 237310). Analyzing this data would reveal the total value of contracts awarded, the types of services rendered, and the duration of their engagement. A trend analysis over several fiscal years would indicate whether this $11.9 million MATOC represents a significant increase, decrease, or continuation of their typical business volume with the Army in this sector. It would also highlight any patterns in contract types (e.g., fixed-price vs. cost-plus) and competition levels for their previous Army awards.

How does the awarded amount of $11.9 million compare to the average value of similar highway, street, and bridge construction contracts in New Mexico?

Comparing the $11.9 million MATOC award to average contract values requires accessing databases that track construction project costs, such as those maintained by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), state Departments of Transportation, or construction industry data providers. The average value can vary significantly based on project scope, complexity, and specific location within New Mexico. For instance, a single large bridge replacement project could easily exceed this amount, while multiple smaller road repair task orders might be bundled. Benchmarking would involve identifying comparable projects awarded within a similar timeframe and geographic area, considering factors like contract type (fixed-price, cost-reimbursable) and competition level. Without this comparative data, it's challenging to determine if $11.9 million represents a particularly high or low value for the anticipated scope of work under this MATOC.

What are the specific risks associated with a MATOC contract for highway construction?

Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) for highway construction carry several potential risks. One primary risk is 'scope creep' or the potential for task orders to expand beyond the original intent, leading to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Another risk is ensuring consistent quality and performance across multiple task orders awarded to potentially different contractors under the same MATOC, although this specific award is to a single contractor. Price reasonableness can also be a concern if task orders are not competed effectively or if market prices for materials and labor increase significantly during the contract period. Furthermore, the administrative burden of managing numerous task orders can be substantial. For the government, there's also the risk of not fully utilizing the contract capacity if task orders are not awarded consistently, or conversely, overcommitting funds if demand exceeds initial projections. Effective oversight and clear task order definitions are crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the typical performance period for a MATOC of this nature, and how does the 733-day duration compare?

MATOCs are typically awarded with a base period and option periods, often spanning several years to allow for flexibility in awarding task orders as needs arise. A base period of 733 days (approximately two years) for a MATOC is relatively short, especially for construction contracts which can have long lead times and execution phases. Often, MATOCs have base periods of 3-5 years, with options to extend. The short duration here might suggest this is a specific task order under a larger, pre-existing MATOC, or it could be a standalone MATOC with a limited scope or funding profile. If it is a standalone MATOC, the 733-day duration implies that all anticipated task orders must be completed within this timeframe, potentially limiting the scope of work that can be effectively managed or executed.

What does the 'NM' (New Mexico) designation signify in the contract details?

The 'NM' designation in the contract details, alongside 'NEW MEXICO', indicates the primary geographic location where the services under this contract are expected to be performed. For highway, street, and bridge construction, this means that the projects awarded via task orders under this MATOC will be situated within the state of New Mexico. This is a crucial piece of information for understanding the contract's impact, as it directs spending and potential job creation to a specific region. It also informs potential bidders about the relevant operating environment, local regulations, and logistical considerations they might face when competing for or executing task orders under this contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3475 E FOOTHILL BLVD # 300, PASADENA, CA, 91107

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,975,246

Exercised Options: $11,975,246

Current Obligation: $11,975,246

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912BV07D2029

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline