DOJ's $17.6M Case Information Support Services Contract Awarded to Integrated Support Systems Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,596,807 ($17.6M)

Contractor: Integrated Support Systems Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2007-11-01

End Date: 2013-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,160 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: CASE INFORMATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22201

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $17.6 million to INTEGRATED SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC. for work described as: CASE INFORMATION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $17.6 million, was awarded to Integrated Support Systems Inc. for case information support services. 2. The award was made under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 3. The duration of the contract is 2160 days, spanning from November 2007 to September 2013. 4. The NAICS code 541990 suggests services related to professional, scientific, and technical areas beyond specific classifications.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total award value of $17.6 million over approximately 6 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar contracts for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' would be necessary for a precise pricing assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This method implies that while competition was sought, specific sources may have been excluded, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests efforts to secure fair pricing for taxpayers, though the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation into potential cost implications.

Public Impact

Citizens rely on efficient case information management for timely legal processes. The services provided likely support the operational efficiency of the Department of Justice's various offices and boards. Transparency in government contracting ensures public trust and accountability in the use of taxpayer funds.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Exclusion of sources in a 'full and open' competition could limit competitive pressure.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes makes it difficult to assess true value.
  • The 'Time and Materials' contract type can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under a competitive process, suggesting an attempt at fair market pricing.
  • Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery.
  • Services support critical functions within the Department of Justice.

Sector Analysis

The sector for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' is broad. Spending benchmarks for this category can vary significantly based on the specific nature of the services rendered, making direct comparisons challenging without more detail.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was awarded to a larger entity, potentially missing opportunities to engage small businesses in government contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's duration and value necessitate robust oversight to ensure performance standards are met and costs remain justified. Monitoring the 'Time and Materials' aspect is crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
  • Department of Justice Contracting
  • Offices, Boards and Divisions Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
  • Lack of detailed service description hinders value assessment.
  • Risk of cost overruns with 'Time and Materials' contract type.
  • No indication of small business participation.
  • Long contract duration without clear performance benchmarks.

Tags

all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-justice, va, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $17.6 million to INTEGRATED SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC.. CASE INFORMATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGRATED SUPPORT SYSTEMS INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-11-01. End: 2013-09-30.

What specific case information support services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the DOJ's mission?

The contract, NAICS 541990, covers 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' While specific details are absent, these services likely encompassed data management, analysis, research, or technical support related to legal cases. Their contribution would be in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the Offices, Boards, and Divisions within the Department of Justice by streamlining information access and processing.

What was the rationale for excluding certain sources in a 'full and open competition' for these services?

The rationale for excluding sources in a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' typically involves specific justifications such as national security, proprietary technology, or unique capabilities possessed by the selected vendor that cannot be replicated by others. Without further documentation, the precise reasons for exclusion remain unclear, but it suggests a belief that the chosen vendor offered the best value or unique qualifications.

How effectively did the 'Time and Materials' contract type manage costs and ensure value for the $17.6 million expenditure over six years?

The effectiveness of a 'Time and Materials' contract in managing costs for a $17.6 million, six-year deal hinges entirely on the rigor of oversight and the clarity of the statement of work. While this contract type offers flexibility, it carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not meticulously monitored for labor hours, rates, and material costs against defined deliverables and performance metrics.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTDEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: DJJK-06-RFP-0398

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1655 N FORT MYER DR STE 700, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,596,807

Exercised Options: $17,596,807

Current Obligation: $17,596,807

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-11-01

Current End Date: 2013-09-30

Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-12-04

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending