DOJ's $12.3M FCI Pollock Warehouse Construction Contract Awarded to Migues Deloach Company LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,309,550 ($12.3M)

Contractor: Migues Deloach Company LLC, the

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2006-02-24

End Date: 2008-02-20

Contract Duration: 726 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION/RENOVATION OF FCI POLLOCK WAREHOUSE

Place of Performance

Location: POLLOCK, GRANT County, LOUISIANA, 71467

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $12.3 million to MIGUES DELOACH COMPANY LLC, THE for work described as: CONSTRUCTION/RENOVATION OF FCI POLLOCK WAREHOUSE Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The duration of the contract was 726 days, suggesting a significant construction or renovation project. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. 4. The award was made by the Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons, part of the Department of Justice. 5. The project is located in Louisiana (LA), specifically Pollock. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without comparable projects from the same period and region. The firm fixed price structure suggests the contractor assumed cost risks. However, the absence of detailed cost breakdowns or performance metrics makes a definitive value assessment difficult. Further analysis would require comparing the final cost against initial estimates and any change orders.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources may have been excluded for specific reasons, potentially impacting the breadth of competition. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated, but the 'limited' competition designation implies fewer than a fully open process.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even if justified, could potentially lead to less competitive pricing for taxpayers compared to a truly unrestricted open competition.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Federal Bureau of Prisons, which gains improved warehouse facilities at FCI Pollock. The services delivered include the construction or renovation of a warehouse, essential for operational logistics. The geographic impact is localized to Pollock, Louisiana, where FCI Pollock is situated. The project likely involved a construction workforce, contributing to local employment opportunities during the contract period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost inefficiencies if source exclusion limited competitive pressure.
Risk of scope creep or delays in large construction projects, even with fixed-price contracts.
Oversight challenges in ensuring quality and adherence to specifications for a complex construction project.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
Awarded by a federal agency with established procurement processes.
Project addresses a specific infrastructure need for the Bureau of Prisons.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal construction spending often involves large-scale projects with complex requirements and stringent oversight. Benchmarking this $12.3 million contract would involve comparing it to other federal or large commercial building projects of similar scope and complexity undertaken during the mid-2000s.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted for small businesses. Therefore, the primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, which are not detailed here, or through competition with larger firms for resources and labor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of Justice, specifically the Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons. As a construction project, oversight would likely involve contract officers, project managers, and potentially quality assurance representatives to monitor progress, adherence to specifications, and budget. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply for any investigations into fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Bureau of Prisons Facility Construction
Department of Justice Infrastructure Projects
Warehouse Construction Contracts
Commercial Building Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Construction projects carry inherent risks of delays and cost overruns (though mitigated by FFP).
Need for detailed performance assessment beyond award data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $12.3 million to MIGUES DELOACH COMPANY LLC, THE. CONSTRUCTION/RENOVATION OF FCI POLLOCK WAREHOUSE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MIGUES DELOACH COMPANY LLC, THE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-02-24. End: 2008-02-20.

What was the specific nature of the 'exclusion of sources' in this full and open competition?

The designation 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies that the solicitation was initially intended for broad competition, but certain potential bidders were excluded based on specific criteria. This could be due to pre-qualification requirements, security clearances, past performance issues, or other factors deemed necessary by the agency. Without further documentation, the exact reasons for exclusion remain unclear. This approach aims to balance broad competition with the need to ensure only qualified and suitable contractors participate, but it can limit the number of bidders and potentially affect price competition.

How does the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type benefit the government in this construction project?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract is advantageous for the government in construction projects like this because it establishes a final price that is not subject to adjustment based on the contractor's cost experience. This shifts the risk of cost overruns entirely to the contractor, Migues Deloach Company LLC. The Bureau of Prisons benefits from cost certainty, allowing for more predictable budgeting. The contractor is incentivized to manage costs efficiently and complete the project within the agreed-upon budget to maximize their profit. However, FFP contracts often include higher initial prices to compensate contractors for the risks they assume.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, for a construction contract of this nature (warehouse renovation/construction), key deliverables would typically include the completion of the facility according to approved architectural and engineering plans, adherence to building codes and safety standards, timely project completion within the 726-day duration, and delivery of a fully functional warehouse space. Performance would likely be assessed based on quality of workmanship, compliance with specifications, and meeting project milestones. The final acceptance of the work by the Bureau of Prisons would signify successful completion.

Can we assess the contractor's track record based on this single award?

Assessing Migues Deloach Company LLC's overall track record based solely on this $12.3 million contract award is insufficient. This single data point indicates they were selected for a significant federal construction project. To evaluate their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on similar federal and commercial contracts, including project complexity, adherence to schedule and budget, quality of work, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Information from sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment.

How does the contract value compare to typical federal warehouse construction projects?

The contract value of $12.3 million for warehouse construction/renovation is a substantial figure, indicative of a significant project. Federal construction projects, especially for correctional facilities, often involve higher costs due to stringent security requirements, specialized materials, and rigorous oversight compared to typical commercial projects. Without specific details on the scope (e.g., square footage, new construction vs. renovation, specific features), direct comparison is difficult. However, it falls within the range of medium-to-large federal construction contracts. Benchmarking against similar Bureau of Prisons projects or other federal agency warehouse constructions from the same period would provide better context.

What are the potential risks associated with a 726-day construction timeline?

A 726-day (approximately two-year) construction timeline presents several potential risks. These include the possibility of unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil issues, hazardous materials), weather delays, material price fluctuations (though mitigated by FFP), labor availability issues, and potential design changes or scope creep requested by the agency. For the government, extended timelines can mean delayed operational benefits. For the contractor, longer durations increase overhead costs and the window for unforeseen problems. Robust project management, contingency planning, and clear communication protocols are essential to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2712 DAVIS DR, PINEVILLE, LA, 06

Business Categories: Category Business, Emerging Small Business, Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,309,550

Exercised Options: $12,309,550

Current Obligation: $12,309,550

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline