DOE awards $112.6M engineering services contract to Booz Allen Hamilton under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $112,643,579 ($112.6M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2002-06-15
End Date: 2007-06-15
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $61.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: LAS VEGAS, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89134
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $112.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a large, established firm, Booz Allen Hamilton. 2. Significant contract value of over $112 million. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract spans five years, indicating a long-term engagement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can lead to higher costs if performance incentives are not carefully managed. Without specific award fee data, it's difficult to definitively assess value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, as it allows multiple vendors to bid. This generally leads to more competitive pricing compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely received a fair price, though the CPAF structure warrants monitoring for cost efficiency.
Public Impact
Supports critical engineering services for the Department of Energy. Potential impact on energy sector projects and national energy initiatives. Long-term contract may influence market dynamics for engineering services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type can incentivize cost overruns.
- Long contract duration (5 years) may reduce flexibility for future needs.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Contract awarded to a reputable firm with extensive experience.
- Clear start and end dates for the contract period.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government infrastructure and project management. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on national priorities and infrastructure investment cycles.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not a direct awardee on this contract (ss: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting goals were established or met.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's duration and CPAF structure suggest a need for robust oversight to ensure performance objectives are met and costs are controlled effectively. Regular performance reviews and audits would be essential.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type.
- Long contract duration (5 years).
- No explicit mention of small business participation.
- Lack of detailed performance and pricing comparison data.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-energy, nv, dca, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $112.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $112.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-06-15. End: 2007-06-15.
What were the specific performance metrics and award fee criteria used in this CPAF contract, and how did Booz Allen Hamilton perform against them?
The specific performance metrics and award fee criteria are not detailed in the provided data. For a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, these typically involve measurable objectives related to technical performance, cost control, schedule adherence, and management. Understanding these criteria is crucial for assessing whether the 'award fee' component truly reflected exceptional performance or simply met baseline expectations, thereby impacting the overall value realized by the government.
How did the pricing proposed by Booz Allen Hamilton compare to other bids received during the full and open competition process?
The provided data confirms 'full and open competition' but does not include details on the number of bids received or a comparative analysis of their pricing. While full and open competition generally promotes competitive pricing, without knowing the bid landscape, it's impossible to definitively state how Booz Allen Hamilton's pricing stacked up against competitors. This information is vital for a thorough value assessment.
What is the estimated cost savings or efficiency gains achieved by the Department of Energy through this specific contract compared to alternative service delivery methods?
The provided data does not contain information on cost savings or efficiency gains. Assessing the effectiveness of this contract requires comparing its outcomes against predefined benchmarks, alternative procurement methods, or historical performance. The CPAF structure itself aims for efficiency through incentives, but its actual impact on cost savings or improved delivery is contingent on the specific award fee structure and performance achieved.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MC LEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $112,643,579
Exercised Options: $112,643,579
Current Obligation: $112,643,579
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-06-15
Current End Date: 2007-06-15
Potential End Date: 2007-06-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-03-29
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)