DOE's $10.1M security guard contract awarded to ISF Security Group, Inc. in West Virginia
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,099,058 ($10.1M)
Contractor: ISF Security Group, Incorporated
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2005-11-01
End Date: 2011-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,917 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SECURITY GUARD SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: MORGANTOWN, MONONGALIA County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26507
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $10.1 million to ISF SECURITY GROUP, INCORPORATED for work described as: SECURITY GUARD SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in physical security for Department of Energy facilities. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (over 5 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The fixed-price nature of the contract aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. The award to a single entity suggests a focus on specialized capabilities or established performance. 6. The geographic focus on West Virginia highlights specific regional security requirements.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award amount of approximately $10.1 million over a period of roughly 5 years suggests a moderate annual expenditure for security guard services. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for federal security services requires detailed analysis of scope, location, and service levels. However, the fixed-price contract type generally indicates an effort to control costs and ensure value for money, assuming the scope was well-defined and competitive pricing was achieved.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the competition was initially broad, certain sources were excluded before the final award. This suggests a process that aimed for broad participation but had specific criteria that narrowed the field. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated, but the 'full and open' designation implies multiple interested parties were considered.
Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and services, potentially leading to cost savings and higher quality outcomes compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Energy facilities in West Virginia, ensuring their physical security and operational continuity. The contract delivers essential security guard services, including patrols, access control, and surveillance. The geographic impact is concentrated in West Virginia, supporting local employment and economic activity through the contractor's operations. Workforce implications include the direct employment of security personnel by ISF Security Group, Inc. in the region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for price creep if the 'exclusion of sources' was not fully justified and limited competition.
- Risk of service quality degradation if contractor performance monitoring is insufficient over the long contract duration.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical security functions could pose a risk if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.
Positive Signals
- Award under full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive price and service offering.
- The firm fixed-price contract type provides budget certainty for the government.
- The long contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing need for these services, suggesting a well-understood requirement.
Sector Analysis
Security guard services fall under the broader commercial and professional services sector. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, contracting for security at various facilities nationwide. This contract, valued at over $10 million, represents a substantial award within this sub-sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific security requirements, number of personnel, and geographic location, but this award is consistent with large-scale federal security contracts.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, large federal contracts can sometimes create opportunities for small businesses as subcontractors, depending on the prime contractor's strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of Energy. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, adherence to contract terms, and potentially site inspections. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Department of Homeland Security Security Services
- General Services Administration Schedules for Security Services
- Department of Defense Security Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Long contract duration requires robust performance monitoring.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical security.
Tags
security-guard-services, department-of-energy, west-virginia, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, israel-security-forces-group-incorporated, physical-security, contract-award, federal-contracting, national-security
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $10.1 million to ISF SECURITY GROUP, INCORPORATED. SECURITY GUARD SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ISF SECURITY GROUP, INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-11-01. End: 2011-01-31.
What was the specific justification for excluding certain sources in the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' process?
The justification for excluding certain sources under this contract type is critical for understanding the true level of competition. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical requirements, past performance, security clearances, or other mandatory criteria that only a subset of potential bidders can meet. Without the specific documentation detailing these exclusions, it's difficult to definitively assess if the competition was genuinely robust or if it was artificially narrowed. This information is usually found in the contract award justification documents, which are not provided in the summary data.
How does the annual cost of this contract compare to similar security guard services at other federal facilities of comparable size and risk profile?
A direct comparison of the annual cost requires detailed data on the scope of services, number of guards, hours of coverage, specific security technologies deployed, and the risk level of the facilities being protected. The total award of $10.1 million over approximately 1917 days (roughly 5.25 years) averages to about $1.92 million per year. To benchmark this effectively, one would need to identify contracts with similar square footage, personnel requirements, and threat environments. Without such comparable data, it's challenging to definitively state whether this contract represents excellent, fair, or questionable value for money solely based on the total award amount.
What is the track record of ISF Security Group, Inc. in performing similar federal contracts, particularly regarding performance metrics and past issues?
Assessing ISF Security Group, Inc.'s track record would involve reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), any documented disputes, contract modifications, or instances of non-compliance on previous federal contracts. A positive performance history, characterized by meeting or exceeding requirements, timely delivery, and effective management, would indicate lower risk. Conversely, a history of issues could signal potential performance concerns for this current contract. This information is typically available through federal procurement data systems but is not included in the provided summary.
What specific security risks or threats were identified at the Department of Energy facilities in West Virginia that necessitated this contract?
The specific security risks and threats would dictate the scope and requirements of the security guard services. For Department of Energy facilities, potential risks could range from unauthorized access, theft of sensitive materials or information, sabotage, terrorism, to ensuring the safety of personnel and the public. Understanding these threats provides context for the level of security required, the number of personnel, the types of patrols, surveillance needs, and emergency response protocols. This information is usually detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) associated with the contract.
How has the spending on security guard services by the Department of Energy evolved over the past decade, and does this contract represent a significant shift?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for DOE's security guard services would involve examining contract awards over the last 10 years. This would reveal trends in total spending, average contract values, and the number of contracts awarded. If this $10.1 million contract is significantly larger or smaller than typical awards, or if it represents a shift in the type of services procured or the contractors utilized, it could indicate a change in the agency's security posture or procurement strategy. Without historical data, it's impossible to determine if this contract represents a significant shift.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: DE-RP26-05NT42398
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 100 N. CENTRAL EXPY, STE 350, RICHARDSON, TX, 90
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,099,059
Exercised Options: $10,099,059
Current Obligation: $10,099,058
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-11-01
Current End Date: 2011-01-31
Potential End Date: 2011-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-02-27
More Contracts from ISF Security Group, Incorporated
- Contract to Provide Guard Service — $16.2M (Department of the Treasury)
View all ISF Security Group, Incorporated federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)