Army Corps of Engineers Awards $10.7M for Conveyors, Competition Limited by Source Exclusion

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,684,054 ($10.7M)

Contractor: Advanced Automation Technologies

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-03-14

End Date: 2008-04-30

Contract Duration: 2,239 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 200207!000597!96CE!CW57 !USA ENGINEER DISTRICT PORTLAND !DACW5702C0012 !A!N! !N! !20020314!20040314!077136070!077136070!077136070!N!ADVANCED AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGI!640 RICE BLVD !EXTON !PA!19341!50550!051!41!MULTNOMAH !MULTNOMAH !OREGON !+000003600000!N!N!000000000000!3910!CONVEYORS !C9D!MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT !5000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !333923!A!A!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!005!N!3A!A!N!A! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !Z! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: CASCADE LOCKS, HOOD RIVER County, OREGON, 97014

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.7 million to ADVANCED AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES for work described as: 200207!000597!96CE!CW57 !USA ENGINEER DISTRICT PORTLAND !DACW5702C0012 !A!N! !N! !20020314!20040314!077136070!077136070!077136070!N!ADVANCED AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGI!640 RICE BLVD !EXTON !PA!19341!50550!051!41!MULTNOMAH !MULTN… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Materials Handling Equipment (Conveyors) to Advanced Automation Technologies. 2. The contract value is $10,684,054, with a duration of 2239 days. 3. Competition was conducted as 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', suggesting potential limitations. 4. The sector is Construction Machinery Manufacturing, with a PSC code of 3910.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.7M for conveyors appears to be a significant investment. Benchmarking against similar contracts for materials handling equipment is necessary to assess pricing fairness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. This method can impact price discovery by limiting the pool of potential bidders, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of a limited competition method may result in taxpayers paying more than if a broader competition had been pursued.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be impacted by potentially higher costs due to limited competition. The contract supports the Army Corps of Engineers' infrastructure or operational needs. The award contributes to the manufacturing sector for materials handling equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition method
  • Long contract duration (2239 days)

Positive Signals

  • Award to a specific company
  • Clear product/service category (Conveyors)

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Construction Machinery Manufacturing sector, specifically for conveyors and materials handling equipment. Spending benchmarks in this sector can vary widely based on project complexity and scale.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army and the Army Corps of Engineers. Accountability for performance and cost would be managed through contract administration and reporting requirements.

Related Government Programs

  • Construction Machinery Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition (Exclusion of Sources)
  • Lack of detailed justification for source exclusion
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to limited competition
  • Long contract duration may introduce risks of obsolescence or changing needs
  • No clear indication of small business participation

Tags

construction-machinery-manufacturing, department-of-defense, or, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.7 million to ADVANCED AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES. 200207!000597!96CE!CW57 !USA ENGINEER DISTRICT PORTLAND !DACW5702C0012 !A!N! !N! !20020314!20040314!077136070!077136070!077136070!N!ADVANCED AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGI!640 RICE BLVD !EXTON !PA!19341!50550!051!41!MULTNOMAH !MULTNOMAH !OREGON !+000003600000!N!N!000000000000!3910!CONVEYORS !C9D!MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT !5000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !333923!A!A!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANCED AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-03-14. End: 2008-04-30.

What specific operational needs or infrastructure projects necessitated the purchase of these conveyors, and how does their cost align with industry standards for similar equipment?

The specific operational needs are not detailed in the provided data. However, the contract value of $10.7M for conveyors suggests a substantial requirement, possibly for a large-scale construction or logistics project. A thorough cost analysis comparing this price to market rates for comparable conveyor systems, considering specifications and volume, is crucial for assessing value for money.

What were the justifications for excluding other sources in the competition, and did this exclusion lead to a demonstrably higher price than might have been achieved otherwise?

The justification for excluding other sources is not provided. This 'limited' competition method raises concerns about whether the government received the best possible price. Without understanding the rationale for exclusion, it's difficult to quantify the potential price increase, but it's a common risk associated with non-full and open competition.

How effectively will these conveyors be utilized to meet the Army Corps of Engineers' objectives, and what metrics are in place to measure their performance and impact?

The effectiveness of the conveyors hinges on their successful integration into the intended Army Corps of Engineers' operations or projects. Performance metrics are not specified in the data. Key indicators would likely include uptime, throughput capacity, maintenance costs, and contribution to project timelines or logistical efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAgriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery ManufacturingConstruction Machinery Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MATERIALS HANDLING EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 640 RICE BLVD, EXTON, PA, 19341

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2002-03-14

Current End Date: 2008-04-30

Potential End Date: 2008-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-03-28

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending