DoD's $21.2M Surveying Contract with GAHAGAN & BRYANT ASSOCIATES, INC. Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,219,349 ($21.2M)
Contractor: Gahagan & Bryant Associates, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-09-30
End Date: 2013-12-31
Contract Duration: 4,110 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: SAN PEDRO, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90731
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.2 million to GAHAGAN & BRYANT ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of over $21 million over 11 years. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The sector is Surveying and Mapping, a specialized service. 5. No indication of small business participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $21.2 million over 11 years averages to approximately $1.9 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for surveying and mapping services of this scale and duration, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the long duration suggests potential for cost efficiencies if managed well.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through a competitive process.
Public Impact
Long-term surveying services for the Department of the Army. Potential impact on land use, development, and infrastructure projects. Contractor GAHAGAN & BRYANT ASSOCIATES, INC. has a long-standing relationship with the DoD.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation noted.
- Long contract duration could mask inefficiencies if not closely monitored.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Full and open competition utilized.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under Surveying and Mapping services, a critical component for infrastructure development, land management, and defense installations. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on government needs for new projects, maintenance, and geographical surveys.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract did not involve small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the nature of the services required specialized large-firm capabilities.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded in 2002 and ended in 2013, suggesting it has concluded. Oversight would have been crucial during its 11-year duration to ensure adherence to contract terms and quality of services provided.
Related Government Programs
- Surveying and Mapping (except Geophysical) Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (11 years).
- No small business participation.
- Lack of detailed service scope in provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed effectively despite FFP.
Tags
surveying-and-mapping-except-geophysical, department-of-defense, ca, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.2 million to GAHAGAN & BRYANT ASSOCIATES, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GAHAGAN & BRYANT ASSOCIATES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-09-30. End: 2013-12-31.
What was the specific scope of surveying and mapping services provided under this contract, and how did it align with the Army's strategic needs during that period?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of surveying and mapping services. To assess alignment with Army needs, one would need to examine contract line item numbers (CLINs), statements of work (SOWs), and any associated project documentation from 2002-2013. This would reveal if the services supported specific military construction, land acquisition, or operational planning requirements.
Given the firm fixed price structure and long duration, what mechanisms were in place to ensure the contractor maintained cost control and quality standards without scope creep?
With a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, the contractor assumes most cost risk. However, effective oversight is still critical. Mechanisms likely included regular progress reviews, quality assurance checks by the government, performance metrics, and clear change order procedures. The long duration necessitates vigilant contract management to prevent scope creep and ensure ongoing value.
How did the 'full and open competition' process for this $21.2M contract ensure optimal value and prevent potential market concentration in surveying and mapping services for the Department of the Arm
Full and open competition theoretically ensures optimal value by allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and improves service quality. For this $21.2M contract, it suggests multiple firms vied for the work, preventing a sole-source situation and potentially leading to better terms for the Army. However, the long duration warrants scrutiny of performance and pricing over time.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Surveying and Mapping (except Geophysical) Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 3802 W BAY TO BAY BLVD SUI, TAMPA, FL, 33629
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-09-30
Current End Date: 2013-12-31
Potential End Date: 2013-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-10-03
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)