DoD Awards $11.5M Contract to Tetra Tech Construction for Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,475,607 ($11.5M)
Contractor: Tetra Tech Construction, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-09-23
End Date: 2005-12-02
Contract Duration: 1,166 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Place of Performance
Location: WATERTOWN, JEFFERSON County, NEW YORK, 13601
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.5 million to TETRA TECH CONSTRUCTION, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Tetra Tech Construction, Inc. for an estimated $11.5 million. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is 1166 days. 4. The award was made by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.5 million over approximately 3.2 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific service details or benchmarks for similar contracts, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing, but the fixed-price nature aims to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces, ensuring the government receives the best value.
Public Impact
Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding, potentially leading to cost savings. The Department of Defense receives services crucial for its operations. Tetra Tech Construction, Inc. gains significant revenue and strengthens its market position. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for the services provided.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific service details makes it hard to assess value.
- No information on small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
- Long contract duration indicates sustained need.
Sector Analysis
The Department of Defense frequently procures construction and related services. An $11.5 million contract over three years is a substantial award, but within the typical range for major construction or engineering projects within the defense sector.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business subcontracting opportunities were included or pursued.
Oversight & Accountability
Awarded under full and open competition suggests a standard procurement process. Oversight would focus on contract performance, adherence to the firm fixed price, and delivery timelines.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific service details.
- No information on small business participation.
- No performance metrics provided.
- Potential for scope creep despite fixed-price contract.
Tags
department-of-defense, ny, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.5 million to TETRA TECH CONSTRUCTION, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH CONSTRUCTION, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-09-23. End: 2005-12-02.
What specific services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's mission requirements?
The provided data does not specify the exact services rendered. However, given the contractor (Tetra Tech Construction) and the awarding agency (Department of the Army), it likely involves construction, engineering, or facility maintenance. Understanding the specific services is crucial to evaluating their necessity and effectiveness in supporting the Army's operational and logistical needs.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how did Tetra Tech Construction perform against them?
Performance metrics and KPIs are not detailed in the provided data. A thorough review would require access to contract performance reports, quality assurance assessments, and any documented issues or commendations related to Tetra Tech's execution of the contract. This information is vital for assessing the contractor's reliability and the overall success of the procurement.
Were there any cost overruns or change orders associated with this firm fixed-price contract, and if so, what was their justification?
Firm fixed-price contracts are designed to minimize cost uncertainty for the government. Any cost overruns or significant change orders would warrant scrutiny to understand the reasons, such as unforeseen site conditions or scope modifications. The absence of such details suggests either smooth execution or a lack of transparency in the available data.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc. (UEI: 045224250)
Address: 2736 STATE HIGHWAY 30, GLOVERSVILLE, NY, 21
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-09-23
Current End Date: 2005-12-02
Potential End Date: 2005-12-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-07-31
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)