DoD's $17.9M Contract for Management Support Services Awarded to Resource Consultants, Inc. with 4 Offers Received
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,945,562 ($17.9M)
Contractor: Serco Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-10-07
End Date: 2008-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,032 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200308!000067!2100!BK11 !ACA, FORT GORDON !DABT6002C0007 !A!N! !N!P00004 !20021106!20031231!097773022!097773022!077846090!N!RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC !2650 PARK TOWER DRIVE !VIENNA !VA!22180!30844!073!13!FORT GORDON !COLUMBIA !GEORGIA !+000000182044!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561110!E! !3! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!R!2!004!A! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: AUGUSTA, RICHMOND County, GEORGIA, 30905, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.9 million to SERCO INC for work described as: 200308!000067!2100!BK11 !ACA, FORT GORDON !DABT6002C0007 !A!N! !N!P00004 !20021106!20031231!097773022!097773022!077846090!N!RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC !2650 PARK TOWER DRIVE !VIENNA !VA!22180!30844!073!13!FORT GORDON !COLUMBIA !GEORGIA !+000000182044!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MA… Key points: 1. The contract value is $17.9 million, awarded to Resource Consultants, Inc. 2. Competition involved 4 offers, indicating some level of market interest. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which can incentivize performance but may lead to higher costs. 4. The sector is Other Management Support Services, with a NAICS code of 561110.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $17.9 million for management support services appears within a reasonable range for similar government contracts. However, without specific details on the scope of services, a precise benchmark is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with four offers received. This suggests a competitive bidding process, which generally aids in price discovery and achieving fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price than a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process for management support services. The contract supports operations at Fort Gordon, Georgia. Resource Consultants, Inc. is the primary contractor for these services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 88 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- The duration of the contract (over 5 years) warrants ongoing monitoring for efficiency.
- Specific performance metrics and award fee criteria are not detailed, impacting accountability.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Multiple offers were received, indicating market interest.
- The contract supports a key military installation (Fort Gordon).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Other Management Support Services, a broad category. Benchmarking requires comparison to similar service contracts within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies, considering the specific deliverables.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this award. Further analysis would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's duration and Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitate robust oversight from the Department of the Army to ensure performance standards are met and costs are controlled effectively.
Related Government Programs
- Office Administrative Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Cost Plus Award Fee structure.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics and award fee criteria.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
- Ambiguity in the precise scope of 'Other Management Support Services'.
Tags
office-administrative-services, department-of-defense, ga, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.9 million to SERCO INC. 200308!000067!2100!BK11 !ACA, FORT GORDON !DABT6002C0007 !A!N! !N!P00004 !20021106!20031231!097773022!097773022!077846090!N!RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC !2650 PARK TOWER DRIVE !VIENNA !VA!22180!30844!073!13!FORT GORDON !COLUMBIA !GEORGIA !+000000182044!N!N!000000000000!R799!OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !561110!E! !3! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!R!2!004!A! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SERCO INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-10-07. End: 2008-04-30.
What specific management support services are included in this contract, and how do they align with Fort Gordon's operational needs?
The contract specifies 'OTHER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES' with a NAICS code of 561110 (Office Administrative Services). While the exact scope isn't detailed, these services typically encompass administrative, clerical, and general management support essential for the day-to-day functioning of a military installation like Fort Gordon.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and award fee criteria that Resource Consultants, Inc. must meet to earn the maximum award fee?
The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or the criteria for the award fee. Understanding these is crucial for assessing contractor performance and the effectiveness of the Cost Plus Award Fee structure in driving desired outcomes and ensuring value for money.
How does the cost-plus award fee structure compare to fixed-price contracts for similar management support services in terms of overall cost and contractor performance?
Cost-plus award fee contracts offer flexibility and can incentivize performance by rewarding contractors for exceeding expectations. However, they carry a higher risk of cost growth compared to fixed-price contracts. For management support services, the effectiveness depends heavily on clearly defined performance metrics and diligent government oversight to control costs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Office Administrative Services › Office Administrative Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Serco Group PLC (UEI: 298452707)
Address: 1818 LIBRARY ST STE 1000, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-10-07
Current End Date: 2008-04-30
Potential End Date: 2008-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-04-25
More Contracts from Serco Inc
- -Pphf-2013-Eligibility Support — $1.2B (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Eligibility Support — $1.0B (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Eligibility Support — $589.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Serco Management Services Inc for Area 5 Igf::ct::igf — $378.8M (Department of Transportation)
- J Plant Renovation — $327.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)