DoD awards $94M for Hellfire missile systems, raising competition concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $52,704,002 ($52.7M)

Contractor: Hellfire Systems, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-09-29

End Date: 2004-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,462 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200012!2100!003086!AH01 !USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!DAAH0100C0179 !A!*!* !20000929!20020930!941092306!941092306!941092306!N!036W7!HELLFIRE SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABI!5798 S SEMORAN BLVD !ORLANDO !FL!32822!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORANGE !FLORIDA !0001!+000012171885!N!N!000000000000!1410!GUIDED MISSILES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !1AIA!BLACKHAWK (UH-60) UTTAS !3728!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !N!J!1!001!N!1G!Z!W!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!B!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32819

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $52.7 million to HELLFIRE SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: 200012!2100!003086!AH01 !USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!DAAH0100C0179 !A!*!* !20000929!20020930!941092306!941092306!941092306!N!036W7!HELLFIRE SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABI!5798 S SEMORAN BLVD !ORLANDO !FL!32822!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORA… Key points: 1. The contract for guided missiles was awarded to Hellfire Systems, LLC. 2. The total value of the contract is $94,109,230.60. 3. The contract was not competed, raising questions about price discovery. 4. The sector is primarily Defense, specifically guided missiles and airframes.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $94.1 million for guided missiles appears high given the lack of competition. Benchmarking against similar missile system contracts would be necessary for a definitive assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was not competed, which limits the government's ability to ensure the best possible price. This sole-source or limited competition approach may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a fully competitive process, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense relies on critical missile systems, making oversight of procurement essential. The long duration of the contract (nearly 4 years) amplifies the potential financial impact of non-competitive awards.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for overpayment
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Award to a specific company for a critical defense item
  • Contract supports aviation and missile command needs

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for guided missiles and related airframes. Spending in this area is critical for national security, but competitive procurement is vital to manage costs effectively.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' designation warrants further investigation into the justification for foregoing competition. Oversight should focus on ensuring fair pricing and strategic sourcing for future procurements.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition raises concerns about fair pricing.
  • Potential for taxpayer overpayment due to non-competitive award.
  • Long contract duration increases financial risk.
  • Limited transparency on justification for non-competition.

Tags

department-of-defense, fl, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $52.7 million to HELLFIRE SYSTEMS, LLC. 200012!2100!003086!AH01 !USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!DAAH0100C0179 !A!*!* !20000929!20020930!941092306!941092306!941092306!N!036W7!HELLFIRE SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABI!5798 S SEMORAN BLVD !ORLANDO !FL!32822!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORANGE !FLORIDA !0001!+000012171885!N!N!000000000000!1410!GUIDED MISSILES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !1AIA!BLACKHAWK (UH-60) UTTAS !3728!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !N!J!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HELLFIRE SYSTEMS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $52.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-09-29. End: 2004-09-30.

What was the specific justification for not competing this contract, and were alternative sourcing strategies considered?

The provided data does not detail the justification for not competing this contract. Typically, non-competitive awards are made when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. However, a thorough review would examine if market research was adequately performed to identify potential competitors or if a sole-source justification was properly documented and approved.

How does the per-unit cost of these Hellfire missiles compare to industry benchmarks or previous contracts for similar systems?

Without specific per-unit cost data and access to industry benchmarks or historical pricing for comparable missile systems, it is impossible to definitively assess value. The total contract value of $94.1 million for guided missiles, awarded non-competitively, suggests a potential for inflated pricing that warrants detailed cost analysis against established benchmarks.

What is the long-term strategic impact of awarding such a significant contract non-competitively on the overall missile systems market?

Awarding significant contracts non-competitively can stifle innovation and discourage new entrants in the defense market. It may signal to potential competitors that opportunities are limited, potentially reducing future competition and leading to sustained higher prices. This can impact the DoD's ability to acquire advanced capabilities cost-effectively over the long term.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5798 S SEMORAN BLVD, ORLANDO, FL, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline

Start Date: 2000-09-29

Current End Date: 2004-09-30

Potential End Date: 2004-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-03-27

More Contracts from Hellfire Systems, LLC

View all Hellfire Systems, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending