DoD Awards $13.4M Contract for Land Mine Engineering Services to Alliant Techsystems Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,599,965 ($11.6M)
Contractor: Alliant Techsystems Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-09-26
End Date: 2014-07-31
Contract Duration: 3,961 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200312!001326!2100!AE30 !TACOM - PICATINNY !DAAE3003C1169 !A!N! !N! !20030926!20051125!133851175!133851175!618705925!N!ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC !4700 NATHAN LANE !PLYMOUTH !MN!55442!51730!053!27!PLYMOUTH !HENNEPIN !MINNESOTA !+000002800000!N!N!000000000000!1345!LAND MINES !A6 !AMMUNITION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !A!N!V!2!002!B! !A!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN County, MINNESOTA, 55442
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.6 million to ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC for work described as: 200312!001326!2100!AE30 !TACOM - PICATINNY !DAAE3003C1169 !A!N! !N! !20030926!20051125!133851175!133851175!618705925!N!ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC !4700 NATHAN LANE !PLYMOUTH !MN!55442!51730!053!27!PLYMOUTH !HENNE… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $13,385,117.50, was awarded to Alliant Techsystems Inc. for engineering services related to land mines. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process for this requirement. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. The sector is Defense, with the specific North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 for Engineering Services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13,385,117.50 appears to be a significant investment for engineering services. Benchmarking against similar defense engineering contracts would be necessary to definitively assess its value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price, though the Cost Plus Incentive Fee structure warrants monitoring for cost efficiency.
Public Impact
This contract supports the Department of Defense's procurement of specialized engineering services. The focus on land mine technology highlights a specific area of defense research and development. The duration of the contract (from 2003 to 2014) indicates a long-term need for these services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract type can incentivize higher costs.
- Long contract duration may increase risk of scope creep or evolving requirements.
- Specific details on the engineering services are limited, making full assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
- Award to a known defense contractor, Alliant Techsystems Inc.
- Contract supports critical defense capabilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for engineering services related to ordnance. Spending benchmarks for specialized defense engineering services can vary widely based on complexity and technology.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration and CPIF structure necessitate ongoing vigilance to ensure accountability and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract type can lead to higher costs.
- Long contract duration (over 10 years) increases risk of cost escalation and requirement changes.
- Lack of specific technical details on services provided hinders full value assessment.
- Potential for contractor to prioritize profit over efficiency due to incentive structure.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, mn, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.6 million to ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC. 200312!001326!2100!AE30 !TACOM - PICATINNY !DAAE3003C1169 !A!N! !N! !20030926!20051125!133851175!133851175!618705925!N!ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC !4700 NATHAN LANE !PLYMOUTH !MN!55442!51730!053!27!PLYMOUTH !HENNEPIN !MINNESOTA !+000002800000!N!N!000000000000!1345!LAND MINES !A6 !AMMUNITION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-26. End: 2014-07-31.
What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the DoD's mission?
The provided data identifies the contract as being for 'LAND MINES' and 'AMMUNITION' with NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services). While specific technical details are not available, these services likely involved design, development, testing, or sustainment of land mine systems and related ordnance, contributing to the Department of Defense's capabilities in this area.
What were the key performance indicators and incentive structures within the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) arrangement?
The data indicates a 'COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE' (CPIF) contract type. CPIF contracts aim to share cost savings and overruns between the government and contractor based on achieving target costs and performance objectives. Specific details on the target cost, incentive sharing formula, and performance metrics are not provided in this dataset.
How did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was achieved for these specialized engineering services?
Full and open competition theoretically allows any responsible source to submit an offer, fostering a competitive environment. This process is intended to drive down prices and encourage innovation. However, the effectiveness in achieving 'best value' depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the number and quality of bids received.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Contractor Details
Address: 4700 NATHAN LANE, PLYMOUTH, MN, 55442
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $462,475
Exercised Options: $462,475
Current Obligation: $11,599,965
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-26
Current End Date: 2014-07-31
Potential End Date: 2014-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-09-25
More Contracts from Alliant Techsystems Inc
- 200510!500526!2100!w15qkn!tacom - Picatinny !w15qkn05c1171 !A!N! !N! ! !20041201!20081201!133851175!133851175!618705925!n!alliant Integrated Defense COM!4700 Nathan LN N !minneapolis !mn!55442!51730!053!27!plymouth !hennepin !minnesota !+000032000000!n!n!000063394088!ad13!rdte/Ammunition-Adv Tech DEV !A6 !ammunition !000 !* !332993!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!u!v!2!002!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!y! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $139.0M (Department of Defense)
- UCA Executed — $116.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200607!600629!2100!w15qkn!tacom - Picatinny !w15qkn06c0139 !A!N! !N! ! !20060329!20061130!133851175!133851175!618705925!n!alliant Techsystems Inc !4700 Nathan LN N !plymouth !mn!55442!51730!053!27!plymouth !hennepin !minnesota !+000010529310!n!n!000010529310!1315!ammunition, 75 MM Through 125 MM !A6 !ammunition !000 !NOT Discernable !332993!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !c!u!j!2!001!n!3a!z!y!a! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!y! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- 199910!1700!2497!bw10a!naval Surface Warfare Center, Da!n0017899c1003 !A!*!* !19990730!20030930!825057656!825057656!618705925!n!18356!alliant Techsystems Inc !340 N Franklin ST !janesville !wi!53545!37825!105!55!janesville !rock !wisconsin !0001!+000021806473!n!n!000000000000!1310!ammunition, Over 30 MM UP to 75 MM !A6 !ammunition !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !3483!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !n!l!1!001!n!1a!a!y!z!* !* !n!c!*!a!a!a!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!c!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $27.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $27.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)