DoD Awards $16.4M for Miscellaneous Items to Wolf Coach Inc., Raising Questions on Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,400,128 ($16.4M)

Contractor: Wolf Coach Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-04-30

End Date: 2010-12-22

Contract Duration: 2,793 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200309!000576!2100!AD13 !USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD1303C0037 !A!N! !N! !20030430!20040430!043469873!043469873!043469873!N!WOLF COACH INC !7 B STREET !AUBURN !MA!01501!02795!027!25!AUBURN !WORCESTER !MASS !+000009161460!N!N!000009161460!9999!MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS !A4B!NON-COMBAT VEHICLES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336112!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!A!A!U!J!2!002!N!2A!Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: AYER, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01432

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.4 million to WOLF COACH INC for work described as: 200309!000576!2100!AD13 !USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD1303C0037 !A!N! !N! !20030430!20040430!043469873!043469873!043469873!N!WOLF COACH INC !7 B STREET !AUBURN !MA!01501!02795!027!25!AUBURN !WORCE… Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Wolf Coach Inc. for miscellaneous items, specifically non-combat vehicles, totals $16.4 million. 2. Competition was listed as 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which warrants further investigation into the exclusion process. 3. The contract duration of 2793 days (over 7 years) suggests a long-term commitment, potentially locking in prices. 4. The sector is Defense, with the specific product being light truck and utility vehicle manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $16.4 million for miscellaneous items and non-combat vehicles over nearly 8 years is substantial. Without specific item details or benchmarks for similar contracts, assessing the value for money is difficult. The 'not discernible or classified' nature of the specific items complicates a direct cost comparison.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is unusual and suggests that potential bidders were excluded. This raises concerns about whether the best possible pricing and solutions were obtained, as the exclusion may have limited the competitive pool.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition and potentially prolonged contract duration could lead to suboptimal pricing, meaning taxpayers may not be receiving the best value for their investment.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to limited competition and a long-term contract. The exclusion of sources in the bidding process raises concerns about fairness and optimal resource allocation. The broad category of 'Miscellaneous Items' makes it difficult for the public to understand the specific goods or services procured.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition due to source exclusion
Long contract duration (nearly 8 years)
Vague description of procured items ('Miscellaneous Items')
Lack of clear per-unit cost benchmark

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a specific company (Wolf Coach Inc.)
Contract is for non-combat vehicles, potentially supporting essential functions

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically related to the manufacturing of light trucks and utility vehicles. Spending benchmarks in this area can vary widely based on vehicle specifications, quantities, and technological advancements. The significant value and long duration suggest a substantial requirement.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method requires robust oversight to ensure the exclusion was justified and that the process was fair. Accountability for the pricing and performance over the long contract term is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Long contract duration
Vague item description
Unclear justification for source exclusion
Potential for overpayment due to limited competition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.4 million to WOLF COACH INC. 200309!000576!2100!AD13 !USA MATERIEL COMMAND ACQUISITION!DAAD1303C0037 !A!N! !N! !20030430!20040430!043469873!043469873!043469873!N!WOLF COACH INC !7 B STREET !AUBURN !MA!01501!02795!027!25!AUBURN !WORCESTER !MASS !+000009161460!N!N!000009161460!9999!MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS !A4B!NON-COMBAT VEHICLES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !336112!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WOLF COACH INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-04-30. End: 2010-12-22.

What specific items were procured under this $16.4 million contract, and how were they classified as 'miscellaneous'?

The contract description lists 'MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS' and 'NON-COMBAT VEHICLES' with a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of 336112 for Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing. However, the specific details of the vehicles or other miscellaneous items are not discernible or classified in the provided data. This lack of specificity hinders a thorough understanding of the procurement's purpose and value.

What was the justification for excluding certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process?

The justification for excluding sources is not provided in the data. This procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, specific potential bidders were deliberately excluded. Understanding the rationale behind these exclusions is critical to assessing whether the competition was truly fair and if the government secured the best possible terms and pricing.

How does the $16.4 million contract value, spread over nearly 8 years, compare to market rates for similar non-combat vehicles and miscellaneous items?

Without detailed specifications of the non-combat vehicles and miscellaneous items, a direct comparison to market rates is challenging. The contract's long duration (2793 days) and firm fixed-price nature suggest that pricing was determined at the outset. A comprehensive analysis would require comparing the unit costs of specific vehicle types and quantities against industry benchmarks and other government contracts awarded during a similar period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 7 B STREET, AUBURN, MA, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline