Department of the Army awards $19.2M roofing contract to SIMON ROOFING AND SHEET METAL CORP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,225,616 ($19.2M)

Contractor: Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-19

End Date: 2006-06-30

Contract Duration: 254 days

Daily Burn Rate: $75.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Place of Performance

Location: NEW ORLEANS, ORLEANS County, LOUISIANA, 70130

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.2 million to SIMON ROOFING AND SHEET METAL CORP. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $19.2M for roofing services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 254 days. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type. 5. Primarily focused on Louisiana. 6. No small business set-aside indicated.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $19.2 million for roofing services over a 254-day period appears substantial. Without specific details on the scope of work, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, but the overall value warrants scrutiny to ensure it aligns with market rates for the services rendered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 5 bids suggests a reasonable level of competition, which typically helps in achieving fair market prices. However, the specific number of bidders doesn't guarantee the most competitive outcome without further analysis of the bids received.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive bidding process, which aims to secure the best possible price for the roofing services required by the Department of the Army.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and its facilities in Louisiana, ensuring the integrity of their infrastructure. Services delivered include roofing repairs and maintenance, crucial for facility upkeep. Geographic impact is concentrated in Louisiana, where the Army facilities are located. Workforce implications would involve skilled tradespeople for roofing installation and repair.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed price does not adequately account for unforeseen complexities in roofing projects.
Dependence on a single contractor for a significant value award could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Limited transparency on the specific scope of work and detailed cost breakdown makes independent value assessment challenging.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a broad search for qualified contractors.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract has a defined duration, allowing for clear performance expectations.

Sector Analysis

The construction and maintenance sector, particularly specialized services like roofing, is a consistent area of government spending. Federal agencies require ongoing maintenance and repair of their vast infrastructure. This contract fits within the broader category of facilities maintenance and repair, a market segment that sees significant annual investment across various government departments.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the contractor is not listed as a small business. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could represent a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem in fulfilling this contract's requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army oversight bodies. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed budget. Transparency is dependent on the public availability of contract details and performance reports.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
Federal Building and Fire Safety Program
General Services Administration (GSA) Building Operations

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Contractor performance risk on large-value projects.
Limited public data on specific work scope and detailed pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.2 million to SIMON ROOFING AND SHEET METAL CORP.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIMON ROOFING AND SHEET METAL CORP..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-19. End: 2006-06-30.

What was the specific scope of work for this $19.2 million roofing contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for this contract. It is identified under NAICS code 238160 for Roofing Contractors. Typically, such contracts would encompass a range of services including the repair, replacement, and maintenance of roofing systems on various Department of the Army facilities. The exact nature of the work, such as the type of roofing systems involved, the extent of repairs (e.g., minor patching versus full roof replacement), and any associated structural work, would be detailed in the contract's statement of work (SOW). Without the SOW, a precise understanding of the services rendered and their associated value is limited.

How does the contract value of $19.2 million compare to typical roofing projects for the Department of the Army?

Benchmarking this $19.2 million contract against typical roofing projects for the Department of the Army is challenging without more specific data. The value suggests a large-scale project, potentially involving multiple facilities or extensive repairs/replacements across a significant installation. Smaller, routine maintenance contracts might range from tens of thousands to a few million dollars. Larger, comprehensive re-roofing or new construction projects could easily reach multi-million dollar figures. The duration of 254 days also indicates a substantial undertaking. To provide a precise comparison, one would need access to historical data on similar large-scale roofing projects awarded by the Army, considering factors like geographic location, building types, and material specifications.

What are the potential risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price contract of this magnitude?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, while offering cost certainty, carries specific risks, especially for a $19.2 million roofing project. The primary risk is that the contractor may underestimate the costs or encounter unforeseen issues (e.g., hidden structural damage, material price fluctuations, difficult site conditions) that erode their profit margin or lead to quality compromises if they attempt to cut corners to maintain profitability. Conversely, if the contractor significantly overestimates costs, the government may end up paying a premium. For the government, the risk lies in ensuring the SOW is comprehensive and accurate to avoid scope creep or disputes. The contractor's financial stability and technical capability to execute such a large project are also critical risk factors.

What does the 'LA' contract status code signify for this award?

The contract status code 'LA' typically signifies 'Award' in federal procurement databases. This indicates that the contract has been officially awarded to the contractor, SIMON ROOFING AND SHEET METAL CORP., by the Department of the Army. It signifies the completion of the solicitation and evaluation process and the commencement of the contractual agreement. Other status codes might indicate actions like solicitation, modification, or termination, but 'LA' specifically denotes a finalized award.

How many bids were received, and what does this imply about competition for this roofing contract?

The data indicates that 5 bids were received for this contract. Having 5 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition. In federal contracting, a higher number of bids generally correlates with more robust competition, which can lead to better pricing and terms for the government. While 5 bids are certainly better than a sole-source award or only one or two offers, the quality and competitiveness of those bids are crucial. Without knowing the details of each bid (e.g., price, technical approach, past performance), it's difficult to definitively say if this level of competition resulted in the best possible value for the taxpayer, but it provides a reasonable foundation for price discovery.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors › Roofing Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT OF RESTORATION ACTIVITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 70 KARAGO AVE, YOUNGSTOWN, OH, 06

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912P905D0522

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline