Department of the Army awards $16.1M contract to LJC Defense Contracting Inc. for roofing services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,077,991 ($16.1M)

Contractor: LJC Defense Contracting Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-28

End Date: 2006-06-30

Contract Duration: 245 days

Daily Burn Rate: $65.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Place of Performance

Location: NEW ORLEANS, ORLEANS County, LOUISIANA, 70130

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.1 million to LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract value of $16.1 million is significant for roofing services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 245 days is relatively short for a project of this scale. 4. The award to LJC Defense Contracting Inc. indicates a specific provider was selected.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $16.1 million for roofing services appears high. Without specific details on the scope of work, it's difficult to benchmark against similar projects. However, the award amount suggests a substantial undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and value for the government. The fact that multiple bids were likely considered suggests a competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer money is spent efficiently by fostering a competitive bidding environment.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding processes that aim to secure the best value. The contract supports infrastructure maintenance and repair within the Department of the Army. Local economy in Louisiana may see indirect benefits from this contract award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • High contract value for roofing services warrants scrutiny.
  • Short contract duration for a large award may indicate potential for rushed work or change orders.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Firm fixed price contract type helps control costs.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for specialized services like roofing for government facilities, can see significant contract values. Benchmarks for such projects vary widely based on scope, location, and specific requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed or if the scope inherently favored larger contractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Standard oversight mechanisms for Department of Defense contracts would apply. The firm fixed price nature of the contract provides some cost control, but performance monitoring is crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Roofing Contractors
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • High contract value for roofing services.
  • Short contract duration relative to award value.
  • Lack of detail on specific services provided.
  • No indication of small business participation.

Tags

roofing-contractors, department-of-defense, la, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.1 million to LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LJC DEFENSE CONTRACTING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-28. End: 2006-06-30.

What specific roofing services were included in this $16.1 million contract, and how does this scope compare to typical roofing projects of similar value?

The provided data does not detail the specific roofing services. A comprehensive analysis would require examining the Statement of Work (SOW) to understand the scope, materials, and complexity. Comparing this to industry benchmarks for similar-sized government roofing contracts would reveal if the $16.1 million represents fair value or if it is potentially inflated due to specific project requirements or market conditions.

Given the short duration of 245 days for a $16.1 million contract, what are the potential risks to project quality and timely completion?

A short duration for a large-value contract can increase the risk of compromised quality if contractors rush to meet deadlines. It may also lead to increased costs through overtime or expedited material delivery. Furthermore, it could limit the number of qualified bidders willing to undertake such a demanding schedule, potentially impacting the competitiveness of the bidding process.

How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the best possible price and quality for these roofing services?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, thereby fostering a competitive environment that should drive down prices and improve quality. The success of this process hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the responsiveness of bidders, and the evaluation criteria used. Without access to the bid details and evaluation outcomes, it's difficult to definitively assess the effectiveness beyond the procedural adherence.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionFoundation, Structure, and Building Exterior ContractorsRoofing Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCT OF RESTORATION ACTIVITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 110 N BELL ST, DOTHAN, AL, 01

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912P905D0521

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-10-28

Current End Date: 2006-06-30

Potential End Date: 2006-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-05-14

More Contracts from LJC Defense Contracting Inc

View all LJC Defense Contracting Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending