General Dynamics IT contract for IT services valued at over $32.4 million by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,400,619 ($32.4M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2003-09-15

End Date: 2009-09-02

Contract Duration: 2,179 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: IT

Place of Performance

Location: EL SEGUNDO, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90245

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $32.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a large, established federal contractor, indicating a focus on established capabilities. 2. The contract duration of nearly 6 years suggests a need for sustained IT support. 3. Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) pricing structure can offer cost certainty while allowing for market fluctuations. 4. The contract was a competitive delivery order, implying a degree of market vetting. 5. Performance context is limited without specific task orders or performance metrics. 6. Sector positioning is within IT services, a broad and critical area for federal operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of over $32.4 million over its nearly 6-year term suggests a significant investment in IT services. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale IT support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The FP-EPA pricing model aims to balance cost control with flexibility for economic changes, which is a common approach for long-term IT services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that it was competed under a broader indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar vehicle that allowed for multiple bidders. The fact that it was a delivery order suggests that the initial IDIQ was competed, and then this specific order was also subject to competition among awardees of that IDIQ. The level of competition for the underlying IDIQ is not specified but delivery orders typically benefit from a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by leveraging market forces to drive down costs and improve service offerings.

Public Impact

Federal agencies utilizing General Dynamics Information Technology Inc. for IT services benefit from potentially enhanced operational efficiency and technological capabilities. The services delivered likely encompass a range of IT support, including infrastructure management, software development, or cybersecurity, depending on the specific task orders. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting federal operations across various locations. Workforce implications could include the direct employment of IT professionals by General Dynamics and potential indirect impacts on federal IT staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services provided.
The FP-EPA pricing structure, while offering flexibility, could lead to cost increases if economic adjustments are significant.
The broad nature of IT services means the specific impact and quality can vary greatly without detailed task order analysis.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting a degree of market validation.
Long contract duration implies a stable and reliable IT support solution for the government.
Contracting with a large, experienced provider like General Dynamics often means access to established processes and expertise.

Sector Analysis

The Information Technology sector is a cornerstone of modern government operations, encompassing a vast array of services from cloud computing and cybersecurity to software development and data management. Federal spending in IT is consistently high, driven by the need to modernize legacy systems, enhance digital services for citizens, and maintain national security. This contract fits within the broader landscape of federal IT procurement, where agencies rely on large contractors to provide comprehensive solutions. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large IT service contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, or other civilian agencies through GSA.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology Inc., a major federal contractor, it is unlikely that small businesses would be direct prime contractors. However, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the scope of this contract, depending on the specific requirements and the prime contractor's subcontracting plan. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests a focus on large-scale, comprehensive IT solutions rather than specific niche capabilities often addressed by smaller firms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA) and the specific agency that utilized the delivery order. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is responsible for managing many of the vehicles under which such delivery orders are placed. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and potential remedies for non-performance. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS-NG (now SAM.gov), which provides public access to contract award data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules
IT Professional Services
Information Technology Support Services
Federal Civilian IT Spending
Large-Scale IT Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Pricing Structure Flexibility
Lack of Specific Performance Metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $32.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-09-15. End: 2009-09-02.

What specific IT services were delivered under this contract, and how did they align with the agency's mission objectives?

The provided data does not specify the exact IT services rendered under this contract. As a broad IT services contract awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology Inc. (GDIT), the scope could have encompassed a wide range of support, such as network management, system integration, software development, help desk support, cybersecurity services, or cloud migration. To understand the alignment with agency mission objectives, one would need to examine the specific task orders issued against this contract and the strategic goals of the procuring agency at the time. Without this granular detail, it's challenging to assess the direct impact on mission accomplishment. GDIT is a major provider of IT solutions across various federal agencies, suggesting the services were likely substantial and critical to the agency's operations.

How does the awarded value of over $32.4 million compare to similar IT services contracts awarded by GSA during the same period?

The awarded value of over $32.4 million for this contract, spanning from 2003 to 2009, places it as a significant IT services procurement. To benchmark this effectively, a comparative analysis with other IT services contracts awarded by GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) during that timeframe is necessary. Factors to consider include the contract type (e.g., fixed-price, cost-plus), the specific services procured (e.g., infrastructure, software development, cybersecurity), and the duration. Contracts of similar scope and duration awarded to large system integrators often fall within the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Without access to a detailed database query of comparable GSA contracts from that era, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value suggests a substantial, long-term commitment to IT support.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract, and how was performance measured?

The provided summary data does not include details on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, for IT services contracts, especially those with a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) structure, performance is measured against defined metrics within individual task orders. These could include system uptime, response times for help desk tickets, project completion rates, security compliance adherence, and user satisfaction. The effectiveness of performance measurement relies heavily on the clarity and measurability of these KPIs/SLAs outlined in the contract and its subsequent task orders. Without access to the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or task order details, assessing performance measurement is not possible.

What is General Dynamics Information Technology Inc.'s track record with GSA and other federal agencies for similar IT services contracts?

General Dynamics Information Technology Inc. (GDIT), now part of General Dynamics, has a long and extensive track record as a major federal contractor, including significant work with the General Services Administration (GSA) and numerous other civilian and defense agencies. They are known for providing a wide range of IT services, from enterprise IT infrastructure and cloud solutions to mission-critical systems engineering and cybersecurity. Their history includes numerous large-scale contracts for IT modernization, support, and transformation across the federal government. GDIT's consistent presence and substantial contract awards indicate a strong capability and established relationships within the federal IT landscape. Reviewing their past performance on similar contracts would generally show a pattern of delivering complex IT solutions, though specific performance details would vary by contract.

Were there any significant challenges or disputes encountered during the performance of this contract?

The provided summary data does not contain information regarding challenges or disputes related to this specific contract. Contract performance can encounter various issues, such as scope creep, technical difficulties, funding limitations, or disagreements over contract terms. Federal contract databases and official records sometimes document major disputes, protests, or contract modifications that indicate challenges. However, without access to the full contract file, litigation records, or agency performance reviews, it is impossible to determine if significant challenges or disputes occurred during the life of this particular delivery order. Many contracts are performed without major public disputes.

How did the economic price adjustment (EPA) clause impact the total cost of the contract over its duration?

The economic price adjustment (EPA) clause in a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) contract is designed to allow for modifications to the contract price based on fluctuations in specified economic factors, such as labor costs, material costs, or inflation indices. The impact of the EPA on the total cost of this contract would depend on the specific indices used, the frequency of adjustments, and the actual economic conditions during the contract period (2003-2009). If inflation or relevant cost indices rose significantly during this period, the EPA could have led to a notable increase in the contract's total value beyond the initial fixed price. Conversely, if economic conditions were stable or deflationary, the impact might have been minimal. Without the specific EPA formula and historical economic data relevant to the contract's scope, quantifying the exact impact is not possible.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DR, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,840,548

Exercised Options: $33,947,008

Current Obligation: $32,400,619

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS09K99BHD0003

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline