USAID Spends $221.6M on Overseas Training via Competitive Delivery Order
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $221,601,814 ($221.6M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development
Start Date: 2006-10-02
End Date: 2011-08-31
Contract Duration: 1,794 days
Daily Burn Rate: $123.5K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OVERSEAS CONTRACT
Plain-Language Summary
Agency for International Development obligated $221.6 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: OVERSEAS CONTRACT Key points: 1. Significant investment in professional development training. 2. Competition method is 'Competitive Delivery Order', indicating some market engagement. 3. No small business participation noted. 4. Contract duration is substantial at nearly 5 years.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $221.6M for professional and management development training over nearly 5 years appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training contracts would be necessary to definitively assess value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract was awarded via a 'Competitive Delivery Order', suggesting multiple vendors were considered. However, the specific details of the competition and the number of bids received are not disclosed, impacting the assessment of price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for overseas training. The effectiveness and necessity of this training directly impact the value for money.
Public Impact
Supports professional growth for personnel involved in international development. Potential for improved program delivery and effectiveness through enhanced skills. Transparency regarding awardee and specific training outcomes could enhance public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation.
- Limited transparency on specific awardees and competition details.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process utilized.
- Focus on professional development training.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under professional services, specifically management and development training. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs and global operations. Benchmarks are difficult without more specific service details.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This represents a missed opportunity to support small businesses in the federal contracting space.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would focus on ensuring the training delivered meets the stated objectives and provides value for the significant investment. Tracking the effectiveness of the training on program outcomes is crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Professional and Management Development Training
- Agency for International Development Contracting
- Agency for International Development Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of transparency on awardees.
- No small business participation.
- Limited detail on training content and effectiveness metrics.
- Unclear competition details beyond 'competitive delivery order'.
Tags
professional-and-management-development-, agency-for-international-development, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Agency for International Development awarded $221.6 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). OVERSEAS CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $221.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-10-02. End: 2011-08-31.
What specific professional and management development training was provided, and how was its effectiveness measured?
The specific training content is not detailed in the provided data. Effectiveness would typically be measured through participant feedback, pre- and post-training assessments, and observed changes in performance or skill application in their roles. Without this information, the direct impact and value of the training remain unclear.
What were the key factors that led to the selection of the winning bidder(s) in this competitive delivery order?
Key factors in competitive delivery orders usually include technical approach, past performance, price, and small business participation (if applicable). The specific evaluation criteria and their weighting for this contract are not provided. Understanding these would clarify the basis for the award and the perceived value proposition of the selected vendor(s).
How does the $221.6M expenditure on overseas training compare to similar training initiatives by other agencies or within USAID?
Direct comparison is challenging without detailed service descriptions and contract durations. However, $221.6M over nearly five years for specialized overseas training is a significant sum. Benchmarking against other large-scale professional development contracts, particularly those focused on international operations, would be necessary to determine if this represents a standard or outlier investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,827,199,936
Exercised Options: $1,926,343,795
Current Obligation: $221,601,814
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: AIDDFDI000500250
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-10-02
Current End Date: 2011-08-31
Potential End Date: 2011-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-26
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Agency for International Development Contracts
- - Ghsc Idiq - Hiv/Aids to — $6.7B (Chemonics International, Inc.)
- Covid-19 Vaccines for International Donation — $4.2B (Pfizer Inc)
- This IS a NEW Task Order (# 03) Issued Against the Basic IQC # Gpo-I-00-05-00032-00. the Purpose of This Task Order IS to Facilitate Continuation of the Scms Program in ALL Pepfar Countries — $3.3B (Partnership for Supply Chain Management Inc)
- - Ghsc Idiq - Malaria Task Order — $2.9B (Chemonics International, Inc.)
- NEW Malaria Task Order Under the Deliver IQC; 2 Year Base Base Contract, 1 Option Year — $1.1B (John Snow, Incorporated)