USAID Indonesia's CEGAH Activity awarded $23.6M to Management Systems International for anti-corruption efforts

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,589,879 ($23.6M)

Contractor: Management Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2016-05-31

End Date: 2021-11-30

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF CEGAH IS A FIVE YEAR ACTIVITY THAT WILL FOCUS ON STRENGTHENING THE JUDICIAL SECTOR, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INSTITUTIONS, UNIVERSITIES AND CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO PREVENT CORRUPTION. THIS CONTRACT SUPPORTS USAID INDONESIA COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION STRATEGY -CDCS 2014-2018 UNDER DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE 1 (DO 1). CEGAH ACTIVITY IS TO BE IMPLEMENTED THROUGH A CONTRACT MECHANISM. IT IS DIVIDED INTO THREE COMPONENTS: 1. EFFECTIVENESS OF JUSTICE SECTOR TO PROSECUTE AND ADJUDICATE CORRUPTION CASES INCREASED 2. KEY GOI CORRUPTION PREVENTION INSTITUTIONS STRENGTHENED 3. CIVIL SOCIETY INITIATIVES ON ACCOUNTABILITY INCREASED, WHICH WILL WORK SIMULTANEOUSLY IN VARIOUS ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT EFFORTS TO PREVENT CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA.

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $23.6 million to MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF CEGAH IS A FIVE YEAR ACTIVITY THAT WILL FOCUS ON STRENGTHENING THE JUDICIAL SECTOR, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INSTITUTIONS, UNIVERSITIES AND CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO PREVENT CORRUPTION. THIS CONTRACT SUPPORTS USAID INDONESIA COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION STRA… Key points: 1. Focuses on judicial sector, government accountability, universities, and civil society to prevent corruption. 2. Supports USAID Indonesia's Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) 2014-2018, Development Objective 1. 3. Contract divided into three components: justice sector effectiveness, corruption prevention institutions, and civil society initiatives. 4. Implemented via a definitive contract mechanism with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee pricing structure. 5. Contract duration spans from May 2016 to November 2021, totaling approximately 66 months. 6. The contract aims to increase the effectiveness of the justice sector in prosecuting corruption cases.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $23.6 million over approximately 5.5 years for a comprehensive anti-corruption program in Indonesia appears reasonable. While direct comparisons are difficult due to the specialized nature of development aid and anti-corruption initiatives, the pricing structure (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) allows for flexibility while incentivizing contractor efficiency. Benchmarking against similar USAID-funded governance and anti-corruption projects would provide further context on value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is expected to yield a fair price and ensure the selection of a capable contractor. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and ensuring that the most effective solutions are procured at the best possible price.

Public Impact

Benefits Indonesian citizens through strengthened governance and reduced corruption. Delivers services aimed at improving the justice sector's capacity to handle corruption cases. Enhances the effectiveness of government institutions responsible for preventing corruption. Empowers civil society organizations to play a more active role in accountability initiatives. Geographic impact is focused on Indonesia, supporting national development objectives. Workforce implications include potential capacity building for local institutions and personnel involved in anti-corruption efforts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
The effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts can be influenced by factors beyond the contractor's control, such as political will.
Measuring the direct impact of such a broad program can be challenging.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Supports a critical development objective aligned with USAID's strategic goals.
The contract is structured to address multiple facets of corruption prevention.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting services, with a focus on governance and development. The market for international development and anti-corruption consulting is specialized, often involving organizations with deep expertise in public administration, legal systems, and institutional reform. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within USAID's portfolio of similar technical assistance and capacity-building programs in developing countries.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-asides or subcontracting plans for this contract. As a large-scale international development activity, it is likely that the prime contractor, Management Systems International, would manage subcontracting opportunities based on specialized needs, but there's no explicit information on small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily be conducted by USAID's mission in Indonesia, ensuring compliance with contract terms and performance objectives. Accountability measures are built into the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure and performance reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through USAID's public contract data, though detailed operational transparency may vary. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply for audits and investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

USAID Development Assistance
Anti-Corruption Programs
Governance and Rule of Law Initiatives
International Development Consulting

Risk Flags

Potential for political interference in anti-corruption efforts.
Challenges in measuring the direct impact of governance programs.
Sustainability of reforms post-contract completion.
Coordination complexities among multiple stakeholders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $23.6 million to MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF CEGAH IS A FIVE YEAR ACTIVITY THAT WILL FOCUS ON STRENGTHENING THE JUDICIAL SECTOR, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INSTITUTIONS, UNIVERSITIES AND CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO PREVENT CORRUPTION. THIS CONTRACT SUPPORTS USAID INDONESIA COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION STRATEGY -CDCS 2014-2018 UNDER DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE 1 (DO 1). CEGAH ACTIVITY IS TO BE IMPLEMENTED THROUGH A CONTRACT MECHANISM. IT IS DIVIDED INTO THREE COMPONENTS: 1. EFFECTIVENESS OF JUSTICE SECTOR TO PROSECUTE AND ADJUDI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-05-31. End: 2021-11-30.

What is the track record of Management Systems International (MSI) in delivering similar USAID-funded anti-corruption or governance projects?

Management Systems International (MSI) has a significant history of working with USAID and other development agencies on a wide range of projects, including those focused on governance, anti-corruption, and institutional strengthening. MSI has implemented numerous activities in various countries aimed at improving public administration, promoting rule of law, and enhancing accountability mechanisms. While specific details on past performance for projects identical to the CEGAH activity would require a deeper dive into contract databases and performance reports, MSI's general profile suggests they possess the requisite experience for such complex undertakings. Their portfolio often includes capacity building for government institutions, support for judicial reforms, and engagement with civil society organizations, aligning well with the objectives outlined for the CEGAH activity.

How does the $23.6 million cost compare to similar USAID anti-corruption initiatives in other countries?

Comparing the $23.6 million cost of the CEGAH activity to similar USAID anti-corruption initiatives requires careful consideration of project scope, duration, country context, and specific objectives. USAID funds a variety of governance and anti-corruption programs globally, with costs varying significantly. Projects focused on broad institutional reform, judicial strengthening, and extensive civil society engagement, like CEGAH, tend to be multi-year and substantial in budget. While $23.6 million over approximately 5.5 years is a significant investment, it falls within the range of large-scale, multi-component development assistance programs. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing it to programs with similar geographic focus, target sectors (justice, government accountability, civil society), and intended outcomes, adjusted for inflation and local cost variations.

What are the primary risks associated with the implementation of the CEGAH activity, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with the CEGAH activity likely include political instability or lack of political will in Indonesia to enact anti-corruption reforms, potential resistance from entrenched interests, challenges in coordinating efforts across multiple government and civil society entities, and difficulties in measuring the tangible impact of anti-corruption interventions. Mitigation strategies would typically involve close collaboration with host government counterparts to ensure buy-in and sustainability, adaptive management approaches to respond to changing political dynamics, robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks to track progress and identify challenges early, and building strong relationships with diverse stakeholders to foster broad support. USAID's oversight and MSI's project management are crucial for identifying and addressing these risks throughout the activity's lifecycle.

How effective has the CEGAH activity been in achieving its stated objectives based on available performance data?

Assessing the effectiveness of the CEGAH activity requires access to its specific performance reports and evaluations, which are not fully detailed in the provided summary data. However, the contract's objectives focus on increasing the effectiveness of the justice sector, strengthening corruption prevention institutions, and increasing civil society initiatives. Success would be measured by indicators such as the number of corruption cases prosecuted and adjudicated, improvements in the transparency and efficiency of key government bodies, and the scope and impact of civil society-led accountability efforts. Given the contract's end date of November 2021, final evaluations would likely be available or in progress, providing a more definitive picture of its achievements and lessons learned.

What has been the historical spending trend for similar USAID anti-corruption programs in Southeast Asia?

Historical spending trends for USAID anti-corruption programs in Southeast Asia show a consistent commitment to supporting good governance and rule of law in the region. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on country needs, strategic priorities, and available funding, USAID has allocated substantial resources to initiatives aimed at combating corruption, strengthening judicial systems, and promoting transparency across various Southeast Asian nations. These programs often involve multi-year commitments and significant budgets, reflecting the complex and long-term nature of institutional reform and anti-corruption efforts. The CEGAH activity in Indonesia represents a notable investment within this broader regional strategy, aligning with the U.S. government's foreign policy objectives in promoting democratic governance and economic stability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: SOL-497-15-000025

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tetra Tech, Inc. (UEI: 045224250)

Address: 200 12TH ST SOUTH, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,589,879

Exercised Options: $23,589,879

Current Obligation: $23,589,879

Actual Outlays: $8,698,217

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 111

Total Subaward Amount: $14,174,458

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline