Department of Education Awards $2.5M Contract for OSEP Program Logistical Support to Lux Consulting Group
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,489,963 ($2.5M)
Contractor: LUX Consulting Group, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Education
Start Date: 2022-06-08
End Date: 2027-02-28
Contract Duration: 1,726 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROCUREMENT IS TO OBTAIN LOGISTICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR PEER REVIEWS OF OSEP PROGRAMS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA) AMENDMENTS OF 2004. THE PURPOSE OF THESE REVIEWS IS TO PROV
Place of Performance
Location: SILVER SPRING, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20910
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Education obligated $2.5 million to LUX CONSULTING GROUP, INC. for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROCUREMENT IS TO OBTAIN LOGISTICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR PEER REVIEWS OF OSEP PROGRAMS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA) AMENDMENTS OF 2004. THE PURPOSE OF THESE REVIEWS IS TO PROV Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Lux Consulting Group, Inc. for administrative and logistical support for OSEP program peer reviews. 2. The contract is for a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) definitive contract with a duration of 1726 days. 3. Procurement was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). 4. The contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611).
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2,489,962.60 over approximately 4.7 years suggests a reasonable annual spend for specialized administrative and logistical support services. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for management consulting and administrative support would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a competitive process for awards below certain thresholds. This method generally allows for broad competition, contributing to price discovery and potentially favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the procurement under SAP aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential program support services.
Public Impact
Ensures continued support for peer reviews of OSEP programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Supports the Department of Education's oversight and evaluation functions for critical disability education programs. Provides continuity in administrative and logistical services, minimizing disruption to program review processes.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration extends beyond typical SAP award periods, raising questions about initial competition scope.
- Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs in the provided data makes assessing value and effectiveness challenging.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
- Competition under SAP suggests an effort to obtain fair market value.
- Contract supports a critical function related to special education programs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs, but consistent support for program oversight and review is a common requirement.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was solicited or achieved through subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Education is responsible for overseeing this contract. The use of a definitive contract and competition under SAP suggests established procurement processes are being followed. However, ongoing performance monitoring is crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Education Contracting
- Department of Education Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration may be long for SAP.
- No small business award.
- Performance metrics not detailed.
- Potential for price changes over contract life.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-education, md, definitive-contract, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Education awarded $2.5 million to LUX CONSULTING GROUP, INC.. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROCUREMENT IS TO OBTAIN LOGISTICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR PEER REVIEWS OF OSEP PROGRAMS AS REQUIRED UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA) AMENDMENTS OF 2004. THE PURPOSE OF THESE REVIEWS IS TO PROV
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LUX CONSULTING GROUP, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Education (Department of Education).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-06-08. End: 2027-02-28.
What specific deliverables are expected from Lux Consulting Group, and how will their performance be measured against these to ensure effective program support?
The contract's purpose is to obtain logistical and administrative support for OSEP program peer reviews. Specific deliverables likely include scheduling, documentation management, travel arrangements, and communication facilitation for review teams. Performance measurement would typically involve adherence to timelines, accuracy of administrative tasks, and feedback from program managers and review participants. Detailed metrics are usually outlined in the contract's statement of work.
Given the contract's duration and SAP competition, what is the risk of potential cost overruns or suboptimal service quality compared to a larger, more extensively competed contract?
While SAP aims for efficiency, longer-duration contracts awarded under it can carry a risk of cost escalation if market conditions change significantly or if the initial pricing was not sufficiently robust. Suboptimal service quality is a risk in any contract; however, a firm fixed price structure incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently. Regular performance reviews and clear communication channels are key to mitigating these risks.
How does the administrative and logistical support provided by this contract directly contribute to the effectiveness of OSEP program peer reviews and the overall goals of IDEA?
Effective logistical and administrative support is crucial for the smooth execution of peer reviews, allowing subject matter experts to focus on the substantive evaluation of OSEP programs. By ensuring timely scheduling, accurate record-keeping, and efficient communication, this contract helps guarantee that reviews are comprehensive and conducted without unnecessary delays. This, in turn, supports the Department of Education's ability to identify program strengths and areas for improvement, ultimately benefiting students with disabilities as intended by IDEA.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 91990022Q0037
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 8403 COLESVILLE RD STE 1100, SILVER SPRING, MD, 20910
Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,489,963
Exercised Options: $2,489,963
Current Obligation: $2,489,963
Actual Outlays: $2,117,652
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-06-08
Current End Date: 2027-02-28
Potential End Date: 2027-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-26
More Contracts from LUX Consulting Group, Inc.
- Acyf and OHS Review Support Contract — $26.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Logistical Support for the Competition — $44.2K (Department of Education)
Other Department of Education Contracts
- Administrative Action — $2.2B (Conduent Education Solutions, LLC)
- - Tivod Supports the Origination, Disbursement, and Reporting of Title IV Federal Student AID Programs, Including - BUT NOT Limited to - Direct Loans, Pell Grants, and the Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants. the Title IV Solution Shall Also Provide Ongoing Support for the Discontinued Title IV Federal Student AID Programs, Including - BUT NOT Limited to - Academic Competitiveness Grants and National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grants — $1.5B (Accenture Federal Services LLC)
- Federal Student AID Common Origination and Disbursement Services — $1.1B (Accenture LLP)
- Provide Direct Loan Services Such AS Call Center and Financial Reporting - Nelnet From 12/15/2019 Through 12/14/2020 — $983.7M (Nelnet Servicing LLC)
- Debt Management and Collections System (dmcs) Igf::ct::igf — $906.9M (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)