DoD's $14.2M Chilled Meats Contract with Tyson Foods Raises Questions on Competition and Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,235,694 ($14.2M)

Contractor: Tyson Foods Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-10-01

End Date: 2008-12-31

Contract Duration: 91 days

Daily Burn Rate: $156.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RESALE - CHILLED MEATS

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGDALE, WASHINGTON County, ARKANSAS, 72762

State: Arkansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.2 million to TYSON FOODS INC. for work described as: RESALE - CHILLED MEATS Key points: 1. Significant spending on chilled meats highlights a key area of food procurement. 2. Sole-source nature of the contract limits competitive pricing and potential savings. 3. The contract's duration and fixed-price structure warrant scrutiny for cost-effectiveness. 4. Analysis of per-unit costs is crucial to assess value against market benchmarks.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $14.2M for chilled meats is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if Tyson Foods' pricing is optimal or aligned with market rates for similar wholesale grocery provisions.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competition. This method bypasses the standard competitive bidding process, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition may result in taxpayers paying a premium for chilled meats, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Military families and personnel rely on commissary services for groceries, including fresh meats. The Department of Defense's procurement practices impact the availability and cost of essential goods. Large contracts with major food suppliers can influence market dynamics and competition within the sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The defense sector's food procurement, particularly for commissaries, involves substantial spending on perishable goods like chilled meats. Benchmarks for wholesale grocery distribution are essential for evaluating such contracts.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve small businesses, as it was awarded to a large corporation, Tyson Foods Inc. Analysis should explore if subcontracting opportunities were considered or available.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this contract warrants further oversight to ensure the Department of Defense obtained fair pricing and that the justification for avoiding competition was robust.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

general-line-grocery-merchant-wholesaler, department-of-defense, ar, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.2 million to TYSON FOODS INC.. RESALE - CHILLED MEATS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TYSON FOODS INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-10-01. End: 2008-12-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract as sole-source, and were alternative competitive strategies explored?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' suggesting a sole-source award. A thorough review would require access to the contract's justification documentation to understand why competition was deemed impossible or impractical. Without this, it's difficult to assess if taxpayer funds were used efficiently or if alternative approaches could have yielded better value.

How does the per-unit cost of these chilled meats compare to market rates or similar government contracts awarded competitively?

The data does not provide per-unit cost details, only the total contract value. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of the types and quantities of chilled meats purchased is needed. This information would allow for comparison against industry benchmarks and other government contracts, particularly those awarded through competitive processes, to identify potential overpricing.

What is the potential impact on food quality and supply chain resilience when relying on a single, large supplier for essential items like chilled meats?

Sole-source contracts can create dependencies that may impact food quality if oversight is lax, and supply chain resilience can be compromised if the sole supplier faces disruptions. While Tyson Foods is a major player, relying exclusively on one entity for a critical need like military food supply could pose risks during unforeseen events, potentially affecting service members and their families.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale TradeGrocery and Related Product Merchant WholesalersGeneral Line Grocery Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2210 W OAKLAWN DR, SPRINGDALE, AR, 72762

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,235,694

Exercised Options: $14,235,694

Current Obligation: $14,235,694

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HDEC0105G3222

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-10-01

Current End Date: 2008-12-31

Potential End Date: 2010-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-06-07

More Contracts from Tyson Foods Inc.

View all Tyson Foods Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending