Energy Department awards $2.25M for administrative security support services to Advantage Sci LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,246,690 ($2.2M)
Contractor: Advantage SCI LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2023-02-01
End Date: 2027-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,460 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE SECURITY SUPPORT SRVCS
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20406
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $2.2 million to ADVANTAGE SCI LLC for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE SECURITY SUPPORT SRVCS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of administrative security support. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of nearly four years indicates a need for sustained support. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 5. The award is a single delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 6. Geographic concentration in Washington D.C. may limit broader applicability.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $2.25 million over four years for administrative security support services seems within a reasonable range for federal contracts of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support services (NAICS 561210) would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is generally favorable for the government, as it caps costs and incentivizes contractor efficiency. Without specific details on the service level agreements and deliverables, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the overall price point does not immediately raise significant concerns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of five bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive environment is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage the selection of the most capable and cost-effective offeror. The specific details of the evaluation criteria and the number of proposals received would further illuminate the effectiveness of the competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to better pricing and ensures that government funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive marketplace.
Public Impact
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) personnel and facilities benefit from enhanced security and administrative support. Services delivered include administrative support crucial for the smooth operation of security functions. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, supporting operations at FERC's primary location. Workforce implications are primarily for the contractor, Advantage Sci LLC, who will provide the necessary personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if administrative tasks extend beyond defined security support.
- Reliance on a single delivery order may indicate a lack of broader strategic sourcing for these services.
- Limited visibility into the specific performance metrics and quality control measures.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract aligns incentives for cost control.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- Contract duration provides stability for essential support services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector (NAICS 561210), which encompasses a broad range of services aimed at maintaining and operating buildings and grounds. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, encompassing everything from janitorial and maintenance to security and administrative support. Spending in this sector is often driven by the need to maintain secure and functional workspaces for federal employees across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader government-wide contracts for facilities management or specific agency solicitations for similar support services.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses indicated in the provided data. The award to Advantage Sci LLC, without further information on its size status, means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear. However, the absence of set-aside provisions suggests that larger businesses or those not specifically focused on small business participation were eligible and potentially awarded the prime contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officer and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) program officials responsible for the administrative security support services. As a delivery order under a potentially larger contract vehicle, oversight might also be influenced by the terms of the parent contract. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed performance reviews and specific oversight mechanisms are typically internal to the agency. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Facilities Management Services
- Administrative Support Services
- Security Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for contractor performance issues.
- Limited visibility into specific performance metrics.
- Reliance on a single delivery order may not reflect optimal strategic sourcing.
Tags
administrative-support, security-services, department-of-energy, federal-energy-regulatory-commission, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, facilities-support-services, district-of-columbia, advantage-sci-llc, naics-561210
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $2.2 million to ADVANTAGE SCI LLC. ADMINISTRATIVE SECURITY SUPPORT SRVCS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ADVANTAGE SCI LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-02-01. End: 2027-01-31.
What is the track record of Advantage Sci LLC in performing similar administrative security support services for federal agencies?
Information regarding Advantage Sci LLC's specific track record in performing administrative security support services for federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract histories, and any reported issues or commendations from previous government engagements. Understanding their experience with similar scopes of work, particularly within the Department of Energy or related entities, is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this contract. Without this historical data, it is difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and expertise in this specialized area.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar administrative security support services?
The provided data does not include specific cost breakdowns or unit pricing that would allow for a direct comparison to market rates. The total contract value of approximately $2.25 million over four years for administrative security support services needs to be benchmarked against industry standards for similar services, considering factors like geographic location (District of Columbia), scope of work, and required security clearances. A detailed analysis would involve comparing the estimated labor hours, overhead, and profit margins to industry benchmarks for facilities support and administrative services. The firm fixed-price nature suggests the contractor believes this price is sufficient to cover costs and provide a reasonable profit.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, such as failure to deliver services as specified, or issues related to personnel security and reliability. Another risk could be cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen circumstances, although this risk is primarily borne by the contractor. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight, clear performance standards, regular progress reviews, and defined remedies for non-performance. The competitive bidding process itself serves as a mitigation factor by selecting a contractor deemed capable and offering a fair price. Specific mitigation plans would be detailed within the contract's performance work statement and associated clauses.
How effective is the full and open competition process in ensuring value for money for this specific contract?
The full and open competition process is designed to maximize value for money by encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best prices and technical solutions. With five bidders participating, there was a reasonable level of competition, which should have driven competitive pricing. The effectiveness is further determined by the agency's evaluation criteria and the rigor with which proposals were assessed. If the agency selected the offer that represented the best value (considering both price and non-price factors), then the competition was effective. However, without insight into the evaluation process and the specific proposals, it's challenging to definitively state the degree of value achieved beyond the inherent benefits of competition.
What is the historical spending pattern for administrative security support services at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission?
The provided data focuses on a single, recent contract award and does not offer historical spending patterns for administrative security support services at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). To understand historical spending, one would need to analyze contract databases for previous awards related to similar services (NAICS 561210, security services, administrative support) issued by FERC over several fiscal years. This analysis would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, number of bidders, and the contractors frequently awarded these types of services. Such a review would help contextualize the current $2.25 million award within FERC's broader procurement history for these functions.
What are the implications of the contract being a single delivery order?
A single delivery order typically signifies that this specific task or set of services is being procured under a pre-existing indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar contract vehicle. This approach allows agencies to procure services incrementally as needed, rather than awarding a large, upfront contract. For taxpayers, this can be beneficial as it avoids obligating funds for services that may not ultimately be required. However, it also means that the competition and pricing associated with this specific order might be influenced by the terms already established in the parent contract vehicle. The overall value and competition of the broader vehicle would be a more significant factor than this single order.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1725 DUKE ST, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,273,535
Exercised Options: $2,246,690
Current Obligation: $2,246,690
Actual Outlays: $1,483,703
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS07F5900R
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-02-01
Current End Date: 2027-01-31
Potential End Date: 2028-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-07
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)