Department of Energy awards $397K for 24 HR Operation Center Equipment and Supplies to ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $39,711 ($39.7K)
Contractor: Abba Technologies, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2026-04-06
End Date: 2026-06-06
Contract Duration: 61 days
Daily Burn Rate: $651/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: 24 HR OPERATION CENTER EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
Place of Performance
Location: ELBERTON, ELBERT County, GEORGIA, 30635
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $39,711.03 to ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: 24 HR OPERATION CENTER EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration is short (61 days), indicating a need for immediate or short-term support. 3. The award amount is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 334111 points to the electronic computer manufacturing sector. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which transfers risk to the contractor. 6. The contract is a delivery order, likely part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a specific task order.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more context on the specific equipment and supplies required. The $397,111 award for a 61-day period suggests a daily expenditure of approximately $6,500. This rate could be reasonable for specialized operational center equipment and immediate supply needs, but a detailed breakdown of the items procured would be necessary for a definitive value assessment. Compared to larger, long-term contracts for similar infrastructure, this appears to be a modest investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 10 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive bidding process, which aims to secure the best possible price and value for the government's expenditure on essential operational center equipment and supplies.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy's operational centers will benefit from the provision of necessary equipment and supplies. This contract supports the continuity and efficiency of critical 24-hour operations within the Department of Energy. The geographic impact is likely localized to the specific facilities where the operational centers are located. The contract may indirectly support the workforce by ensuring they have the tools and resources needed to perform their duties effectively.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed scope of work makes it difficult to assess if the awarded equipment and supplies fully meet the operational needs.
- Short contract duration may indicate a reactive procurement rather than strategic planning, potentially leading to rushed deployments or suboptimal choices.
- Firm Fixed Price contract, while transferring risk, could lead to contractor seeking cost efficiencies that might impact quality if not closely monitored.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, ensuring a broad range of potential suppliers were considered.
- Multiple bids (10) indicate a competitive market for these types of goods and services.
- The contract is for essential operational equipment and supplies, directly supporting critical government functions.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT and general supplies sector, specifically related to electronic computer manufacturing and related equipment. The Department of Energy, like many federal agencies, relies on robust operational centers for monitoring and managing its vast infrastructure and energy systems. Spending on such equipment is crucial for maintaining security, efficiency, and response capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other agency procurements for similar operational center setups or emergency response equipment, which can vary significantly based on scale and technological requirements.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. might be a small business itself, the contract was not formally designated as such. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore neutral unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, where the contractor is responsible for delivering specified goods within budget. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for review of basic contract details. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on whether the procurement falls under broader DOE IG oversight initiatives or if specific concerns arise regarding fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Operational Support Contracts
- Federal IT Equipment Procurement
- Emergency Response Infrastructure
- Electronic Computer Manufacturing Services
Risk Flags
- Short contract duration may indicate urgency or potential for follow-on needs.
- Lack of detailed scope prevents full value assessment.
- Firm Fixed Price requires careful monitoring to ensure quality.
Tags
it, department-of-energy, operational-support, equipment-and-supplies, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, small-value-contract, georgia, electronic-computer-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $39,711.03 to ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. 24 HR OPERATION CENTER EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $39,711.03.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-06-06.
What specific types of equipment and supplies are included in this $397,111 award?
The provided data does not specify the exact types of equipment and supplies. The NAICS code 334111 suggests a focus on electronic computer manufacturing, which could encompass servers, workstations, networking hardware, peripherals, and related consumables. However, without the detailed contract statement of work or line item breakdown, it is impossible to ascertain the precise nature of the items procured. This information is critical for a thorough value assessment and understanding the operational impact.
How does the $397,111 award compare to historical spending by the Department of Energy for similar operational center needs?
Direct comparison is difficult without knowing the specific nature of the equipment and supplies. However, $397,111 for a 61-day period represents a significant daily expenditure rate (approx. $6,500/day). If this is for routine equipment and supplies, it might be on the higher side. If it includes specialized, high-demand items or emergency replacements, the cost could be justified. Historical data on similar, short-term procurements for operational centers within the DOE would be needed for a meaningful benchmark. Larger, long-term contracts for operational center build-outs or sustainment would naturally have different cost structures.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?
The provided summary data does not include details on specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs). For a Firm Fixed Price contract of this nature, the primary performance expectation is the timely and complete delivery of the specified equipment and supplies. Any deviations from the delivery schedule or specifications would constitute a breach. More detailed performance metrics would typically be outlined in the contract's statement of work or delivery order details, focusing on factors like delivery timelines, equipment functionality, and condition upon arrival.
What is the track record of ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for the Department of Energy?
Information regarding ABBA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s specific track record with the Department of Energy or other federal agencies is not provided in the summary data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), any past disputes or contract terminations, and their history of delivering similar types of goods or services. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and past success in meeting government requirements.
What is the risk associated with the short 61-day duration of this contract?
The primary risk associated with a short 61-day duration is the potential for rushed procurement processes, which could lead to less thorough vetting of options or suboptimal equipment/supply choices. It may also indicate an urgent, unforeseen need, increasing the risk of price gouging if competition is limited by time constraints. For the government, there's a risk that the procured items may not be the most cost-effective long-term solution or that follow-on needs will require another rapid, potentially expensive procurement. However, it also limits the government's long-term commitment and exposure if the initial solution proves inadequate.
How does the 'Electronic Computer Manufacturing' NAICS code align with the need for '24 HR Operation Center Equipment and Supplies'?
The NAICS code 334111, 'Electronic Computer Manufacturing,' aligns well with the need for '24 HR Operation Center Equipment and Supplies' if the supplies include computers, servers, networking hardware, and related electronic components essential for operating such a center. Operation centers often require robust computing infrastructure for monitoring, data processing, communication, and control systems. This code suggests the contractor is involved in producing or supplying these core electronic components, which are fundamental to the functioning of any modern 24-hour operational facility.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing › Electronic Computer Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - END USER
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5301 BEVERLY HILLS AVE NE, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, 87113
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $39,711
Exercised Options: $39,711
Current Obligation: $39,711
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNG15SC00B
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-06
Current End Date: 2026-06-06
Potential End Date: 2026-06-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-06
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)