DOE's $2.47M Project Control Management Support Contract Awarded to AttainX Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,473,711 ($2.5M)
Contractor: Attainx Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2018-10-01
End Date: 2023-11-30
Contract Duration: 1,886 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROJECT CNTRL MGMT SUPPORT 2 FTE
Place of Performance
Location: RICHLAND, BENTON County, WASHINGTON, 99354
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $2.5 million to ATTAINX INC. for work described as: PROJECT CNTRL MGMT SUPPORT 2 FTE Key points: 1. Contract provides essential administrative and management consulting services. 2. Awarded through a full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of nearly 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to a focus on management consulting. 6. The contract was awarded as a BPA Call, indicating it leverages an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. 7. The small business set-aside flag is false, meaning it was not specifically reserved for small businesses.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.47 million over approximately five years for two full-time equivalent positions (FTEs) appears reasonable for management consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the duration and the nature of the services, the per-FTE cost is likely within an acceptable range for specialized support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 8 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. The multiple bids received indicate that the government explored various options to secure the best value.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy benefits from enhanced project control and management support. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting. The contract is geographically located in Washington (WA), supporting federal operations in the region. The contract supports federal workforce needs by providing specialized management expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized and difficult to transition.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical project management functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost predictability.
- Full and open competition with multiple bidders suggests a competitive market for these services.
- The contract leverages an existing BPA Call, potentially streamlining procurement and reducing administrative burden.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is characterized by a wide range of firms offering expertise in areas such as operational efficiency, strategic planning, and project management. The market size for management consulting services is substantial, with government contracts forming a significant portion. This specific contract appears to be a moderate-sized engagement within the broader federal consulting landscape.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data does not indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This means that larger businesses were eligible to compete and potentially win the award. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests that the nature of the services or the contracting strategy did not prioritize small business participation for this particular procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of Energy. Performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and quality of services would be key areas of oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Management and Consulting Services
- Project Management Support
- Federal Administrative Services
- Department of Energy Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues
- Reliance on contractor for critical functions
Tags
management-consulting, project-control, department-of-energy, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, administrative-support, washington-dc, professional-services, naics-541611
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $2.5 million to ATTAINX INC.. PROJECT CNTRL MGMT SUPPORT 2 FTE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ATTAINX INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-10-01. End: 2023-11-30.
What is the track record of AttainX Inc. in performing similar federal contracts?
A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess AttainX Inc.'s track record. Key indicators to examine would include past performance evaluations on similar contracts, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the company's experience with the Department of Energy or similar agencies. Understanding their performance on previous projects, particularly those involving project control and management support, would provide insight into their capability to successfully execute this current contract. Without specific past performance data, it is difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and effectiveness.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar management consulting services?
To compare the awarded price to market rates, one would need to benchmark it against similar contracts for administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) awarded by the federal government or state/local governments. Factors such as the number of FTEs, the level of expertise required, the duration of the contract, and the specific services rendered would need to be considered. The contract value of $2.47 million over nearly five years for two FTEs suggests an approximate annual cost per FTE. If this figure is significantly higher or lower than comparable contracts, it would indicate potential overpricing or exceptional value, respectively. Further analysis would involve examining the specific deliverables and the complexity of the project control management support.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
Primary risks could include potential performance issues by the contractor, such as delays or subpar quality of management consulting services, which could impact the Department of Energy's project timelines. Another risk is the potential for cost overruns if the Firm Fixed Price structure is not adequately managed or if unforeseen scope changes occur. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the government, clear performance metrics and deliverables, regular progress reviews, and adherence to the established payment schedule tied to performance. The competitive nature of the award also serves as a mitigation factor, as the government selected a contractor presumably based on a competitive proposal and past performance.
How effective is the project control management support provided by this contract in achieving its objectives?
Assessing the effectiveness of the project control management support requires examining the Department of Energy's project outcomes during the contract period. Key performance indicators (KPIs) related to project timeliness, budget adherence, risk management, and stakeholder satisfaction would need to be evaluated. If projects managed under this support consistently meet their deadlines and budget constraints, and if risks are effectively identified and mitigated, then the support is likely effective. Conversely, consistent project failures or significant deviations from planned objectives would suggest a lack of effectiveness. The government's contract administration and performance monitoring processes are crucial for tracking and ensuring effectiveness.
What are the historical spending patterns for project control management support at the Department of Energy?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for project control management support at the Department of Energy would involve reviewing procurement data over several fiscal years. This would reveal the total amount spent on such services, the number of contracts awarded, the primary contractors utilized, and the average contract values. Understanding these patterns can help identify trends, assess the consistency of spending, and determine if the current contract's value aligns with historical investments in similar support functions. It can also highlight any shifts in strategy or reliance on external consultants for project management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 725 CHURCH STREET, SUITE 505, LYNCHBURG, VA, 24504
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,473,711
Exercised Options: $2,473,711
Current Obligation: $2,473,711
Actual Outlays: $1,877,279
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89303918AEM000003
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-10-01
Current End Date: 2023-11-30
Potential End Date: 2023-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-26
More Contracts from Attainx Inc.
- Usda Farm Loan Program Maintenance and Modernization Flpmm — $52.1M (General Services Administration)
- Pcit Contract (GSA Delivery Order) — $16.9M (Department of Agriculture)
- National Marine Fisheries Service (nmfs) Alaska Regional Office (AKR) Information Technology (IT) Support Services — $10.0M (Department of Commerce)
- Vscadvatm Help Desk — $6.9M (General Services Administration)
- This Call Order Issued Under Blanket Purchase Agreement 1305M224A0009 Defines the A&A Services Requirements to Provide Prompt, Reliable and High-Quality Annual Assessments of ALL NWS Systems (currently [5] High, [17] Moderate and [3] LOW and 3 NO — $5.7M (Department of Commerce)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)