DoD's $14.6M Grocery Resale Contract with Quaker Oats Raises Questions on Competition and Value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,586,354 ($14.6M)
Contractor: Quaker Oats Company, the
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-02-01
End Date: 2008-03-31
Contract Duration: 59 days
Daily Burn Rate: $247.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: RESALE - ASSORTED GROCERY (SECTION A)
Place of Performance
Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60661
State: Illinois Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $14.6 million to QUAKER OATS COMPANY, THE for work described as: RESALE - ASSORTED GROCERY (SECTION A) Key points: 1. Significant spending on assorted groceries highlights reliance on established suppliers. 2. Lack of competition suggests potential for inflated prices and limited market exploration. 3. The contract's duration and fixed-price nature may not fully adapt to market fluctuations. 4. Analysis needed to determine if alternative sourcing or bulk purchasing could yield savings.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $14.6M for a 2-month period is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price reflects fair market value compared to similar grocery wholesale contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract is listed as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This significantly restricts price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competitive pressure in this large grocery procurement likely results in taxpayers paying a premium for goods.
Public Impact
Commissary shoppers may see a limited selection or higher prices due to non-competitive sourcing. Taxpayer funds are allocated without the benefit of competitive market forces driving down costs. Reliance on a single supplier for essential goods can create supply chain vulnerabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpricing
- Limited supplier options
Positive Signals
- Ensured supply of essential goods
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under wholesale trade, specifically general line grocery merchant wholesaling. Benchmarks for this sector are highly variable, but competitive bidding typically yields prices 10-30% lower than sole-source arrangements.
Small Business Impact
The contract does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses, suggesting that opportunities for smaller grocery suppliers were likely overlooked.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status warrants further investigation by oversight bodies to ensure the government received the best possible value and explored all viable competitive avenues.
Related Government Programs
- General Line Grocery Merchant Wholesalers
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Commissary Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for price gouging
- Limited market analysis
- No small business participation noted
- Short contract duration may indicate urgency or poor planning
Tags
general-line-grocery-merchant-wholesaler, department-of-defense, il, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $14.6 million to QUAKER OATS COMPANY, THE. RESALE - ASSORTED GROCERY (SECTION A)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is QUAKER OATS COMPANY, THE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-02-01. End: 2008-03-31.
What was the justification for limiting competition on this substantial grocery contract?
The justification for limiting competition is not provided in the data. Typically, such limitations are based on factors like urgent need, unique capabilities of a single source, or specific government requirements that only one vendor can meet. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if the limitation was warranted or if it simply served to bypass a more efficient procurement process.
How does the per-unit cost compare to market rates for similar grocery items?
A direct per-unit cost comparison is not possible without itemized pricing data and specific product details. However, given the lack of competition, it is highly probable that the per-unit costs are higher than what could be achieved through competitive bidding. Further analysis would require access to the specific items procured and their market prices at the time of the contract.
What is the potential financial impact on taxpayers due to the lack of competition?
The financial impact on taxpayers is likely negative, manifesting as inflated prices for the groceries purchased. While the exact amount is unknown without a competitive benchmark, sole-source contracts generally result in higher costs compared to open competition. This could range from a moderate increase to significantly higher prices, depending on the specific goods and market dynamics.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Grocery and Related Product Merchant Wholesalers › General Line Grocery Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pepsico, Inc. (UEI: 001287762)
Address: 555 WEST MONROE STREET, CHICAGO, IL, 60661
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,586,354
Exercised Options: $14,586,354
Current Obligation: $14,586,354
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HDEC0104G2954
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-02-01
Current End Date: 2008-03-31
Potential End Date: 2009-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-06-07
More Contracts from Quaker Oats Company, the
- Resale - Miscellaneous Grocery — $19.5M (Department of Defense)
- Resale - Miscellaneous Grocery — $19.3M (Department of Defense)
- Resale - Cereal, Rice, Rice Cakes — $19.1M (Department of Defense)
- Resale - Miscellaneous Grocery — $18.1M (Department of Defense)
- Resale - Miscellaneous Grocery — $17.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)