HHS Awards $24.5M Contract for Medical Case Reviewer Services to Carolyn Reiman

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,500 ($24.5K)

Contractor: Carolyn Reimann

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2027-02-28

Contract Duration: 333 days

Daily Burn Rate: $74/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 143

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: HSB114 C 7172. MEDICAL CASE REVIEWER VICP

Place of Performance

Location: CABIN JOHN, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20818

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $24,500 to CAROLYN REIMANN for work described as: HSB114 C 7172. MEDICAL CASE REVIEWER VICP Key points: 1. Contract value of $24.5 million over approximately 333 days. 2. Competition method is 'COMPETED UNDER SAP', indicating a competitive process within simplified acquisition procedures. 3. Risk appears moderate given the fixed-price contract type and established agency. 4. Sector is primarily administrative and management consulting services within healthcare.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.5 million for a 333-day period suggests a daily rate of approximately $73,574. This appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized administrative and management consulting services, especially those requiring specific expertise like medical case review.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting a competitive bidding process was utilized. This method aims to ensure fair pricing and access for qualified vendors, though the specific number of bids received is not detailed.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award under SAP suggests that taxpayers are likely receiving fair value for the services rendered, as multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid.

Public Impact

Ensures continued support for medical case reviews, crucial for program integrity and beneficiary services within HHS. Supports administrative functions within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The contract's duration and value indicate a significant operational need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 74 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Contract duration is relatively short (333 days), potentially leading to future re-competition and transition costs.
  • Specific details on the number of bids received under SAP are not provided, limiting full assessment of competition intensity.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under a competitive process (SAP).
  • Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
  • Long-term agency relationship (implied by BPA Call) may indicate reliable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector, specifically supporting healthcare operations. Benchmarks for this sector can vary widely based on specialization, but the value suggests a significant scope of work.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was competed under SAP and awarded via a BPA Call. There is no explicit information on whether small businesses were involved or benefited from this specific award, nor if it was set aside for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Oversight would involve monitoring performance against the firm fixed price contract terms and ensuring adherence to program requirements.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
  • Health Resources and Services Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Contract duration is less than one year.
  • Specific number of bids not detailed.
  • No explicit mention of small business participation.
  • Potential for scope creep or underestimation in fixed-price contracts.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-health-and-human-services, md, bpa-call, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $24,500 to CAROLYN REIMANN. HSB114 C 7172. MEDICAL CASE REVIEWER VICP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CAROLYN REIMANN.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Health Resources and Services Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24,500.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2027-02-28.

What is the specific expertise required for the Medical Case Reviewer role, and how does Carolyn Reiman's background align with these needs?

The specific expertise for a Medical Case Reviewer typically involves clinical knowledge, understanding of healthcare regulations, and strong analytical skills to assess medical documentation. This role is critical for programs like VICP (Veterans' Injury Compensation Program) to determine eligibility and process claims accurately. Carolyn Reiman's alignment would depend on her qualifications, certifications, and prior experience in similar medical review or claims processing roles within government or private healthcare settings.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for medical case review services, especially concerning quality and timeliness?

A firm fixed-price contract can incentivize efficiency but may pose risks if the scope is not perfectly defined or if unforeseen complexities arise. For medical case review, risks include potential compromises in review quality to meet cost targets, or delays if the contractor underestimates the workload or faces staffing challenges. Ensuring robust performance metrics and clear communication channels is vital to mitigate these risks and maintain service standards.

How effective is the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' approach in ensuring optimal value and performance for specialized healthcare administrative services like medical case review?

Competing under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) is generally effective for acquiring goods and services below certain thresholds, promoting efficiency and quicker awards. For specialized services like medical case review, its effectiveness hinges on whether SAP allows sufficient competition among qualified niche providers. While it can ensure fair pricing, the depth of competition might be less than under full and open procedures, potentially impacting the range of innovative solutions or the absolute best value achievable.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 143

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6425 83RD PLACE, CABIN JOHN, MD, 20818

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,500

Exercised Options: $24,500

Current Obligation: $24,500

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 75R60223A00016

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-01

Current End Date: 2027-02-28

Potential End Date: 2027-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-01

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending