HHS awards $3.48M contract for diagnostic safety, with ATW Health Solutions Inc. leading
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,483,517 ($3.5M)
Contractor: ATW Health Solutions Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2024-02-05
End Date: 2027-02-04
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: DIAGNOSTIC SAFETY COORDINATING CENTER
Place of Performance
Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20857
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $3.5 million to ATW HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC. for work described as: DIAGNOSTIC SAFETY COORDINATING CENTER Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.48 million over 3 years for diagnostic safety coordination. 2. ATW Health Solutions Inc. secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541990 suggests broad professional, scientific, and technical services. 5. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 6. The award was made by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $3.48 million over three years for diagnostic safety coordination appears moderate for a federal contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for professional, scientific, and technical services within healthcare research and safety initiatives would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, while flexible, warrants close monitoring to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and do not escalate beyond initial expectations. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data does not specify the number of bidders, which is crucial for understanding the intensity of competition. A robust competition typically leads to better pricing and innovation. The fact that it was competed openly is a positive sign for price discovery and ensuring taxpayer value.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely healthcare providers and patients, through improved diagnostic safety protocols. The services delivered will focus on coordinating efforts to enhance the safety of diagnostic processes within healthcare. The geographic impact is likely national, given the scope of federal healthcare research and safety initiatives. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized expertise in healthcare safety, quality improvement, and data analysis.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed.
- Lack of specific number of bidders in the data limits assessment of competition intensity.
- The broad NAICS code (541990) could encompass a wide range of services, making precise value assessment difficult without further detail.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent procurement process.
- Contract supports a critical area of healthcare: diagnostic safety.
- The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is a reputable agency focused on improving healthcare quality and safety.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically related to healthcare research and safety. This sector is characterized by a demand for specialized expertise and often involves complex analytical and advisory services. Federal spending in this area supports evidence-based improvements in healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within contracts awarded by agencies like AHRQ, CDC, or NIH for similar research, analysis, and coordination services.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. Furthermore, there is no information regarding subcontracting plans or goals related to small businesses. Without this data, it is difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem or whether opportunities for small business participation were prioritized.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the awarding agency. As a delivery order under a potential IDIQ, oversight may also be influenced by the terms of the parent contract. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance work statement and deliverables outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG, where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Initiatives
- Healthcare Research and Development
- Diagnostic Error Reduction Programs
- Health Information Technology Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
- Scope creep risk without stringent oversight.
- Dependence on contractor's expertise for effective coordination and analysis.
Tags
healthcare, hhs, ahrq, professional-scientific-technical-services, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, diagnostic-safety, patient-safety, maryland, moderate-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $3.5 million to ATW HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.. DIAGNOSTIC SAFETY COORDINATING CENTER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ATW HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-02-05. End: 2027-02-04.
What is the track record of ATW Health Solutions Inc. with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Health and Human Services?
A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess ATW Health Solutions Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of contract modifications or disputes. Understanding their experience with similar types of services, such as healthcare safety, research coordination, and technical consulting, would be particularly relevant. A strong history of successful contract performance with HHS or other federal agencies would indicate a lower performance risk for this new award. Conversely, a history of issues could raise concerns about the contractor's ability to meet the requirements of this diagnostic safety coordinating center contract.
How does the $3.48 million contract value compare to similar diagnostic safety coordination efforts funded by the federal government?
To benchmark the $3.48 million contract value, one would need to identify comparable federal contracts awarded for diagnostic safety coordination, patient safety initiatives, or related healthcare research and technical services. This comparison should consider the duration of the contract (3 years), the scope of work, and the specific deliverables. For instance, contracts awarded by agencies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for patient safety programs could serve as benchmarks. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure also needs to be considered, as T&M contracts can vary significantly in total cost depending on the hours worked. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is moderate, but a detailed comparative analysis is required for a definitive conclusion on value for money.
What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for diagnostic safety coordination?
The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for diagnostic safety coordination is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts pay the contractor for the actual labor hours and materials used. If not carefully managed and monitored, this can lead to costs exceeding initial estimates or budgets. For diagnostic safety coordination, risks include scope creep where tasks expand beyond the original intent, inefficient labor utilization, or the use of higher-than-necessary labor categories. Effective oversight, clear task definitions, and robust reporting mechanisms are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value. The agency must actively manage the contractor's effort to prevent unnecessary expenditures.
What is the expected effectiveness of the services provided under this contract in improving diagnostic safety?
The effectiveness of the services provided under this contract will depend heavily on the specific tasks outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW) and the contractor's ability to execute them. As a 'Diagnostic Safety Coordinating Center,' the contractor is expected to facilitate communication, share best practices, analyze data, and potentially develop guidelines or tools to reduce errors in diagnostic processes. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is well-positioned to oversee such an initiative, given its mission. Success will be measured by tangible improvements in diagnostic accuracy, reductions in diagnostic-related patient harm, and the successful dissemination and adoption of safety protocols across healthcare settings. Key performance indicators (KPIs) within the contract will be critical for assessing effectiveness.
How has federal spending on diagnostic safety and related patient safety initiatives evolved over the past five years?
Federal spending on diagnostic safety and broader patient safety initiatives has generally seen an upward trend, driven by recognition of the significant impact of medical errors on patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Agencies like AHRQ, CDC, and NIH consistently fund research and programs aimed at improving healthcare quality and safety. While specific figures for 'diagnostic safety coordination' might be embedded within larger patient safety or healthcare quality improvement budgets, the overall investment reflects a commitment to evidence-based interventions. Analyzing historical spending patterns within AHRQ's portfolio, particularly for contracts related to safety, quality improvement, and research coordination, would reveal the trajectory and scale of federal investment in this critical area.
What is the significance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) awarding this contract?
The significance of AHRQ awarding this contract lies in its alignment with the agency's core mission. AHRQ is dedicated to producing evidence to make healthcare safer, higher quality, and more accessible, affordable, and equitable. By funding a 'Diagnostic Safety Coordinating Center,' AHRQ is directly investing in efforts to reduce diagnostic errors, which are a major source of patient harm. This contract signifies AHRQ's commitment to tackling a complex and critical aspect of healthcare delivery. The agency's expertise in health services research and its role in disseminating findings make it an appropriate steward for such an initiative, aiming to translate research into practice and improve patient safety nationwide.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 625 W ADAMS ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60661
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $5,717,466
Exercised Options: $3,483,517
Current Obligation: $3,483,517
Actual Outlays: $2,372,869
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA22D006G
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-02-05
Current End Date: 2027-02-04
Potential End Date: 2029-02-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-04
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →