American Indian Council on Alcoholism receives $2.78M for substance abuse services from HHS Indian Health Service
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,776,102 ($2.8M)
Contractor: American Indian Council on Alcoholism Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
Start Date: 2021-01-01
End Date: 2022-12-31
Contract Duration: 729 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: ALCOHOL SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: MILWAUKEE, MILWAUKEE County, WISCONSIN, 53220
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Health and Human Services obligated $2.8 million to AMERICAN INDIAN COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM INC for work described as: ALCOHOL SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price competition. 2. The contract duration of 729 days suggests a need for sustained services. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty but could limit flexibility. 4. Services are targeted towards outpatient mental health and substance abuse centers. 5. The awardee has a single contract with the federal government. 6. Geographic focus on Wisconsin indicates a specific regional need.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $2.78 million for substance abuse services appears to be a significant investment. Without comparable contract data for similar services provided to American Indian communities, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost predictability for the government. However, the lack of competition raises concerns about whether the pricing reflects the best possible value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor is uniquely qualified or when there are other compelling reasons to bypass full and open competition. The absence of multiple bidders means there was no direct price comparison or negotiation driven by market forces, potentially leading to a higher price than if it had been competed.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit the government's ability to leverage competition to secure the lowest possible prices, potentially resulting in less favorable terms for taxpayers.
Public Impact
Beneficiaries include American Indian individuals in Wisconsin requiring substance abuse treatment. Services delivered are outpatient mental health and substance abuse care. Geographic impact is concentrated within Wisconsin. The contract supports the provision of essential healthcare services to a specific demographic.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potential cost savings.
- Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to single award.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical substance abuse needs within the American Indian community.
- Fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
- Award to a specialized provider potentially ensures relevant expertise.
Sector Analysis
The healthcare sector, particularly specialized services like substance abuse treatment, often sees targeted federal funding. This contract falls under the 'Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers' NAICS code (621420). Federal spending in this area aims to address public health crises and provide care to underserved populations. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing it to similar sole-source or competed contracts for substance abuse services within tribal health programs or similar community-based organizations.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The award to a single entity suggests that opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors may be limited unless proactively sought by the prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Indian Health Service (IHS), a division of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The IHS has established protocols for contract monitoring and performance evaluation. However, the specific oversight mechanisms and transparency measures for this sole-source award are not detailed in the provided data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Indian Health Service Programs
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Grants
- Tribal Health Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award raises concerns about competition and potential value.
- Limited information on contractor's federal contracting history.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in provided data.
Tags
healthcare, substance-abuse-treatment, mental-health, indian-health-service, department-of-health-and-human-services, wisconsin, sole-source, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, outpatient-services, american-indian-council-on-alcoholism-inc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Health and Human Services awarded $2.8 million to AMERICAN INDIAN COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM INC. ALCOHOL SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMERICAN INDIAN COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISM INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-01-01. End: 2022-12-31.
What is the track record of American Indian Council on Alcoholism Inc. with federal contracts?
Based on the provided data, American Indian Council on Alcoholism Inc. has one federal contract, which is this specific award from the Department of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Service). This suggests a limited history of direct federal contracting. Further investigation into their performance on this contract, as well as any state or local government contracts they may hold, would be necessary to fully assess their track record. Information on past performance, successful delivery of services, and client satisfaction would be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar substance abuse treatment contracts?
A direct comparison of this $2.78 million contract value is difficult without access to a broader dataset of similar federal contracts for substance abuse services, particularly those targeting American Indian communities or operating within Wisconsin. Sole-source awards, by their nature, lack a competitive benchmark. To assess value, one would ideally compare the cost per patient, the scope of services provided, and the duration against other contracts. If this contract is for a significant population or a comprehensive suite of services, the value might be justified, but without comparative data, it remains an assumption.
What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source contract?
The primary risks associated with this sole-source contract include potential overpayment due to the lack of competitive bidding, which could lead to suboptimal value for taxpayer money. There's also a risk of vendor dependency, where the government becomes reliant on a single provider, potentially reducing leverage for future negotiations or service improvements. Furthermore, without a competitive process, there's a reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or aggressively seek efficiencies. The effectiveness of the services delivered and the contractor's ability to meet the program's objectives also represent inherent risks.
How effective are the services provided under this contract likely to be?
The effectiveness of the services provided hinges on several factors not fully detailed in the data. The contract is for 'Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers,' suggesting a focus on accessible, non-residential care. The effectiveness will depend on the quality of care, the qualifications of the staff, the specific treatment methodologies employed, and the engagement of the target population. The fact that the Indian Health Service is funding these services implies an identified need and a belief in the potential for positive outcomes. However, measuring the actual impact on substance abuse rates and community well-being would require specific performance metrics and outcome evaluations.
What are the historical spending patterns for substance abuse services within the Indian Health Service?
Historical spending patterns for substance abuse services within the Indian Health Service (IHS) generally reflect a commitment to addressing the disproportionately high rates of substance use disorders within American Indian and Alaska Native communities. The IHS allocates significant resources towards behavioral health, including prevention, treatment, and recovery support. Spending fluctuates based on congressional appropriations, public health priorities, and the specific needs identified across different tribal service areas. This contract represents a portion of that broader spending, aimed at fulfilling the federal government's trust responsibility to provide healthcare services.
What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' which typically implies a sole-source or limited-source justification. Common reasons for sole-source awards include the unique capabilities of the contractor, the urgent need for services where competition is impractical, or when only one responsible source exists. For tribal health services, it might also relate to established relationships, cultural competency, or specific program requirements unique to serving American Indian populations. A formal justification document, usually required for sole-source awards, would detail the specific rationale and satisfy federal acquisition regulations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Outpatient Care Centers › Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › GENERAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6510 W LAYTON AVE STE 101, GREENFIELD, WI, 53220
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,776,102
Exercised Options: $2,776,102
Current Obligation: $2,776,102
Actual Outlays: $2,226,296
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-01-01
Current End Date: 2022-12-31
Potential End Date: 2022-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-04
Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts
- Contact Center Operations (CCO) — $5.5B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS Oper of Govt R&D Goco Facilities — $4.8B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Provide the Full Complement of Services Necessary to Care for UC in ORR Custody Including Facilities Set-Up, Maintenance, and Support Internal and Perimeter (IF Applicable) Security, Direct Care and Supervision Inc — $3.5B (Rapid Deployment Inc)
- Contact Center Operations — $2.6B (Maximus Federal Services, Inc.)
- Federal Contract — $2.4B (Leidos Biomedical Research Inc)
View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →